the glyco-SBLs, Fig. 1(b), the presence of a homochiral
auxiliary at position 166 with correct stereochemical disposition
of its C-6 hydroxymethyl group and ring oxygen creates a
hydrogen bond acceptor and donor motif which allows binding
of the NHZ group in the S
operate either by binding mode (a) or (b). However, in these
glyco-SBLs, neither -amino acids with the (a) mode nor -
1
pocket. Thus, glyco-SBLs may
L
D
amino acids with the (b) mode represent optimally matched
diastereomeric pairs. This is consistent with their broadened
specificity. By introducing a carbohydrate moiety at position
Fig. 1 Summarized representation of molecular mechanics analysis which
showed different binding modes of (a) -amino acids in SBL-WT or glyco-
SBLs and (b) -amino acids only in glyco-SBLs
1
66 we have therefore tailored an enzyme with previously
exclusive -stereospecificity and excellent efficiency (matched
pair) into an enzyme that has broadened - and -ster-
L
L
D
L
D
to excellent yields of 9, (91–95%), 10, (77–92%)
,
and fair yields
eospecificity and reduced, but still good, efficiency due to
mismatched pairing. This modified enzyme clearly has greater
synthetic utility. This molecular mechanics analysis therefore
raises the interesting possibility that the stereochemistry of the
sidechain at 166 may influence stereospecificity through a
double diastereoselective process. Further studies, including the
synthesis of diastereomeric protein glycosylating reagents, to
explore whether this is correct or whether location of just polar
achiral groups at this position will have the same effect are now
in progress. In addition, we are probing the precise effects of
of 11, (54–67%) compared well, or were superior to, those for
SBL-WT.
Our next goal was to investigate any secondary effects of S
A specificity using the a-branched
-alaninamide (8) as a challenging acyl acceptor probe. The
restricted S A specificity of the unglycosylated SBL-WT
enzyme is demonstrated by its ability to catalyze only the
coupling of 8 with the preferred -phenylalaninate acyl donor 1.
Remarkably, in spite of the small S
SBLs S166C-S-a–d were catalysts for the coupling of
1
pocket glycosylation upon P
1
L
1
L
8
1
A pocket all of the glyco-
-amino
L
these modifications upon kinetic parameters kcat and K
M
using
acids 1–3 with 8. In the synthesis of 13, low absolute yields
were observed yet these represent a significant breakthrough in
comparison with the absence of coupling activity prior to
glycosylation. Excitingly, the yields of the coupling of 3 with 8
were similar to those obtained using unhindered 7 (48–55%).
L
- and -amino acid substrates as both acceptors and donors in
D
order to correlate the observed yield enhancements with true
kinetic specificity.
In conclusion, glyco-SBLs S166C-S-a–d accept a wide range
of substrates including -amino acids as acyl donors and an a-
D
These results represent a dramatic improvement of the S
1
A
branched acyl acceptor to give a variety of dipeptides, many in
very high yields, that cannot be synthesized with SBL-WT.
Furthermore, these dramatic improvements have been achieved
specificity of SBL. Interestingly, chemically-modified mutant
enzymes bearing non-polar modifications at position 166 do not
9
catalyze this ligation. Possibly by exploiting polar interactions,
without the loss of the natural ability of SBL to handle -amino
L
we have obtained our goal of broadening substrate specificity,
acids. It therefore represents a true broadening of synthetic
utility and demonstrates that this site-selective glycosylation
technology is a powerful tool for enhancing the application of
enzymes in organic synthesis.
here of P
1
A towards -Ala to allow the synthesis of 12–14,
L
without diminishing the natural breadth of SBL. Indeed,
previous molecular mechanics analysis of similarly internally
glycosylated enzymes have indicated that such internally-bound
carbohydrates may act as hydrogen-bonding motifs that give
We acknowledge NSERC (Canada) and Genencor Inter-
national, Inc for generous funding. We are also grateful to
Genencor International, Inc., for providing WT- and S166C-
SBL enzymes, and to Drs Rick Bott and Kanjai Khumtaveeporn
for helpful discussions. We also thank the EPSRC (UK) for
access to the Mass Spectrometry Service at Swansea and the
Chemical Database Service at Daresbury.
2
rise to enhanced kinetic parameters.
Finally, we examined these powerful glyco-SBLs in the
coupling of -amino acids (4)–(6) as acyl donors with acyl
D
acceptor 1. The number of examples of enzyme catalyzed
coupling of -amino acids at the C-terminus of peptides by
using
D
D
-amino acid acyl donors is vanishingly small and even
1
0
then proceed with typically low efficiencies. For example, to
the best of our knowledge, yields above 10% for the
References and notes
†
Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: detailed experi-
9
incorporation of
with this, SBL-WT did not accept
D
-Glu have never been achieved. Consistent
mental procedures of peptide couplings and selected chemical data of the
products. See http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/cc/b0/b010021m/
D
-amino acids as acyl donors
and starting materials 4–6 were recovered. In dramatic contrast,
all of the glyco-SBLs S166C-S-a–d were able to catalyze the
1
C.-H. Wong and G. M. Whitesides, Enzymes in Synthetic Organic
Chemistry, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1994, pp 41–130; K. Faber,
Biotransformations in Organic Chemistry, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag,
Heidelberg, 1995, pp. 298–305 and references cited therein.
coupling of all three of these -amino acid esters with acyl
D
acceptor 1. The reactions of 4 in all cases were slow and gave 15
in low yields, the best being 8% using S166C-S-b,d, and
starting material 4 was recovered after 48 h in all cases. Peptide
couplings of 5, 6 with 7 proceeded more rapidly, and the yields
2 R. C. Lloyd, B. G. Davis and J. B. Jones, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2000, 8,
1
537.
3
4
H. Kunz and K. Ruck, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1993, 32, 336.
S. Masamune, W. Choy, J. S. Peterson and L. R. Sita, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl., 1985, 24, 1.
were dramatically improved. In fact, the good yields of the
dipeptide 17 (62–64%) were, surprisingly, superior to those
found for coupling of -Glu. Indeed, S166C-S-c showed a 1.2+1
stereochemical preference for -glutamate 6 over -glutamate 3.
-Ala dipeptide (16) were also
D
-
L
5
6
Nomenclature according to I. Schechter and A. Berger, Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun., 1967, 27, 152.
D
L
Very high yields (up to 80%) of
observed.
D
B. G. Davis, R. C. Lloyd and J. B. Jones, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 9614;
B. G. Davis and J. B. Jones, Synlett, 1999, 1495; B. G. Davis, M. A. T.
Maughan, M. P. Green, A. Ullman and J. B. Jones, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 2000, 11, 245; B. G. Davis, R. C. Lloyd and J. B. Jones,
Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2000, 8, 1527; B. G. Davis, Chem. Commun.,
Such is the remarkable nature of these broadened P
stereospecificities that we speculated that these glyco-SBLs
may bind -amino acids in a different mode from -amino acids.
1
D
L
2
001, 351.
Molecular mechanics analyses of SBL-WT and S166C-a–d
with substrates 1–6 resulted in the models summarized in Fig. 1.
In SBL-WT the normal binding mode for the acyl-enzyme
intermediate, which is shown in Fig. 1(a), operates. The amino
7
8
9
Determined by titration with PMSF: C. Y. Hsia, G. Granshaw, C. Paech
and C. J. Murray, Anal. Biochem., 1996, 242, 221.
For 3D-structure of SBL-WT see M. Knapp, J. Daubermann and R. R.
Bott, RCSB-PDB entry 1jea.
K. Khumtaveeporn, G. DeSantis and J. B. Jones, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 1999, 10, 2563.
acid side chain (R) binds in the S
group covalently linked to O of the side chain of Ser221. This
binding mode is not available to -amino acids. In contrast, in
1
pocket with the reacting acyl
g
D
10 Y. Asano and T. L. Lübbehüsen, J. Biosci. Bioeng., 2000, 89, 295.
904
Chem. Commun., 2001, 903–904