Communication
Ir complexes stabilized by bi-dentate P^N-ligands, which are
very efficient in borrowing hydrogen (or hydrogen auto-trans-
[
a]
Table 4. Substrate scope (4a–f) quinoxaline synthesis.
[
29]
[b]
fer) reaction, failed as catalysts (Table 1, entries 9 and 10).
However, Ir complexes stabilized by tri-dentate P^N^P-li-
gands gave significantly better conversions (Table 1, entries 1–
Entry
1
Product
Diol
Yield [%]
89
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
8). Variation of ligand substituents revealed 1a as the best cat-
alyst for the benzimidazole synthesis discussed here. The re-
leased gas was identified as hydrogen. After optimization of
the reaction conditions and finding the best catalyst, we
became interested in exploring the substrate scope of the re-
action (Table 2). Various functionalized benzyl alcohols and ali-
phatic alcohols were used. Olefinic groups at the aliphatic alco-
hol can be tolerated (Table 2, entry 8). With chloro-substituted
benzyl alcohol a decrease of the yield is observed due to
minor dehalogenation. Particularly good to very good isolated
yields were observed using aliphatic alcohols. Furthermore, we
were able to access methyl and methoxy-substituted diamines
2
3
4
87
83
81
61
[
c,d]
e]
5
6
[
4 f
77
(
Table 2, entries 9 and 10). The use of mono N-alkylated di-
1
[a] Reaction conditions: benzene-1,2-diamine (8.0 mmol), 1,2-diol
amines leads to N -alkylated benzimidazoles in isolated
yields> 90% (Table 2, entries 11 and 12). Based on the condi-
tions we optimized, 1,2-diols were reacted with benzene-1,2-
diamine. Instead of 2-hydroxyalkyl functionalized benzimida-
(8.8 mmol), 1a (0.06 mol%), KOtBu (16.0 mmol), THF (26 mL), 908C, 24 h.
[b] Isolated yields. [c] 1,2-diol (12.8 mmol). [d] 1a (0.3 mol%); [e] 1a
(0.1 mol%).
[
22e–g,r,30]
zoles, quinoxalines
were formed. The catalyst system ef-
ficiently oxidized both OH-groups of the diol, which condense
much faster than benzimidazole formation is observed. In con-
trast to earlier described transition metal-catalyzed synthetic
sired products can be obtained in good to very good yields.
Higher catalyst loadings were needed for disubstituted 1,2-
diols (Table 4, entry 5) and monosubstituted 1,2-diols carrying
a bulky substituent (Table 4, entry 6).
[
31]
routes starting from o-phenylenediamines and diols or a-hy-
[
32]
droxy ketones which only work in the presence of a hydro-
gen acceptor, we present a protocol with liberation of molecu-
lar hydrogen to give quinoxalines. This new reaction was again
optimized regarding the reaction parameters. The performance
of selected catalysts is shown in Table 3.
In conclusion, we developed a novel benzimidazole synthe-
sis. Aromatic diamines and alcohols are connected by a con-
densation step and by the liberation of two equivalents of H2.
Iridium complexes stabilized by tridentate P^N^P-ligands are
the best catalysts for this reaction. If 1,2-diols are used, the oxi-
dation of both alcohol functions and subsequent condensation
forming quinoxalines is significantly faster than benzimidazole
formation.
The following parameters resulted from the optimization:
a benzene-1,2-diamine to butane-1,2-diol ratio of 1.0 to 1.1,
THF as solvent and 2.0 equivalents of KOtBu. Interestingly,
a very low catalyst loading (0.06 mol% of 1a) is needed. The
catalysis runs nicely at 908C for 24 h in a reaction tube con-
[
19a]
nected with a semi permeable membrane.
The semi perme-
Acknowledgements
able membrane selectively liberates H and allows working in
2
THF above the boiling point of the solvent. This synthesis
route permits the use of a variety of 1,2-diols (Table 4). The de-
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemein-
schaft (KE 756/23-1).
Keywords: acceptorless dehydrogenation
benzimidazoles · iridium · quinoxalines
·
alcohols
·
Table 3. Catalyst screening for the quinoxaline synthesis.
[
1] T. Lçscher, G. D. Burchard, Tropenmedizin in Klinik und Praxis, 4. Auflage,
Georg Thieme Verlag KG, Stuttgart, 2010, p. 1055–1056.
[
b]
[2] M. Wehling, Klinische Pharmakologie, 2. Auflage, Georg Thieme Verlag
KG, Stuttgart, 2011, p. 264.
Entry
Cat. Complex
Yield [%]
1
2
3
4
5
1a
1b
1c
2a
2b
90
49
34
1
[
[
[
[
[
3] C. Lamberth, J. Dinges, Bioactive Heterocyclic Compound Classes, Wiley-
VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2012, p. 105–118.
4] P. Fritsch, Dermatologie Venerologie, 2. Auflage, Springer Verlag, Berlin,
2
004, p. 171.
0.5
5] H. M. Smith, High Performance Pigments, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.
KGaA, Weinheim, 2002, p. 135–158.
6] B. Meuthen, A. S. Jandel, Coil Coating, 2. Auflage, Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn
Verlag, Wiesbaden, 2008, p. 65.
[
(
a] Reaction conditions: benzene-1,2-diamine (8.0 mmol), butane-1,2-diol
8.8 mmol), KOtBu (17.6 mmol), THF ( 26 mL), catalyst loading 0.04 mol%,
908C, 24 h. [b] Determined by GC analysis.
7] G. G. Scherer, Fuell Cells II, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2008, p. 65–120.
Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 1 – 5
3
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
&
&
These are not the final page numbers! ÞÞ