(Table S1 in SD).9 In contrast to this result, the kf value of 1f
together with that of 1e were less than those of 1a-d, suggesting
that a structural change in the C=N bonds of 1e and 1f in the S1
states decelerates the radiative process. In fact, the LUMOs of e
1e and 1f have nodal planes at the C=N bonds (Figure S3 in SD).
In
conclusion,
we
prepared
the
push-pull
2-
phenylbenzothiazoles 1a-f, and clarified the spectroscopic
properties. Phenyl derivative 1a shows solvatochromic
fluorescence with good Φf values in various solvents. The
introduced electron withdrawing groups in 1b-f lead to red-shifts
of the λf values compared to 1a. In particular, 1c and 1d show
near-infrared fluorescence in chloroform, and have ON/OFF
fluorescence functionality by switching polar and less polar
solvents. The Φf values of imine 1e and hydrazone 1f are less
than those of aldehyde 1b. Imine 1e shows efficient fluorescence
in the solid state, because the crystal packing inhibits a structural
change of 1e in the S1 state and the twisted phenyl group of the
imine moiety interferes intermolecular interactions for quenching.
Further fine tuning of the push-pull structure is in progress for
designing luminescent materials of soft crystals.
Table 3. Calculation data of 1 in vacuum with DFT and TD-
DFT using B3LYP/6-31G(d).
a
Compd.
HOMO
/eV
LUMO
/eV
ΔEH−L
/eV
λtr/nm (f) b
configurationc
1a
1b
1c
1d
1e
1f
−4.99
−1.25
3.74
359 (0.61) H → L (0.70)
428 (0.59) H → L (0.70)
537 (0.66) H → L (0.71)
531 (0.76) H → L (0.71)
433 (0.97) H → L (0.70)
423 (1.45) H → L (0.70)
−5.22
−5.40
−5.16
−5.06
−4.82
−2.10
−2.92
−2.62
−1.93
−1.64
3.12
2.48
2.54
3.13
3.18
Acknowledgments
a Energy difference between HOMO and LUMO. b Wavelength estimated
from the energy of the S0 → S1 transition. Oscillator strengths are in the
parentheses. c Configuration of excitation. Coefficients are in the parentheses.
H and L denote HOMO and LUMO, respectively.
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant
(JP17H06371). We thank the Information Technology Center of
UEC for technical assistance in computing DFT calculations.
References and notes
It was found that only imine 1e showed solid state
fluorescence with the λf value at 600 nm (Fig. 3) with a moderate
Φf value (0.49). The crystal structure of 1e indicated that dimeric
units (A/A’ pairs) with a head-to-tail orientation make stair-like
stacked structures (Fig. 4). Imine 1e has an elongated shape, and
the long axes of the two molecules in the unit are nearly parallel.
Because the phenyl ring of the imine moiety is twisted at 30° in
the molecular structure of 1e, electronic interactions for
quenching the fluorescence state may be inhibited in the dimers.10
Concerning to 1e, the packing in the crystals would inhibit a
structural change in the C=N bond in the S1 state, resulting in
efficient solid-state fluorescence.
1.
2.
Shimomura, O. In Bioluminescence: Chemical Principles and
Methods, Rev. Ed., World Scientific Publishing: Singapore, 2012,
pp. 1−30.
(a) Branchini, B. R.; Murtiashaw, M. H.; Magrar, R. A.; Portier,
N. C.; Ruggiero, M. C.; Stroh, J. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
2112−2113; (b) Branchini, B. R.; Southworth, T. L.; Murtiashaw,
M. H.; Magrar, R. A.; Gonzalez, S. A.; Ruggiero, M. C.; Stroh, J.
G. Biochemistry 2004, 43, 7255−7262.
3.
4.
Hirano, T.; Hasumi, Y.; Ohtsuka, K.; Maki, S.; Niwa, H.; Yamaji,
M.; Hashizume, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 2385−2396.
(a) Hirano, T.; Nagai, H.; Matsuhashi, T.; Hasumi, Y.; Iwano, S.;
Ito, K.; Maki, S.; Niwa, H.; Viviani, V. R. Photochem. Photobiol.
Sci. 2012, 11, 1281−1284; (b) Kakiuchi, M.; Ito, S.; Yamaji, M.;
Viviani, V. R.; Maki, S.; Hirano, T. Photochem. Photobiol. 2017,
93, 486−494.
5.
(a) Etaiw, S. E.-D. H.; Fayed, T. A.; Saleh, N. Z. J. Photochem.
Photobiol. A 2006, 177, 238−247; (b) Ono, M.; Hayashi, S.;
Kimura, H.; Kawashima, H.; Nakayama, M.; Saji, H. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 7002−7007; (c) Hrobarik, P.; Hrobarikova,
V.; Sigmundova, I.; Zahradnik, P.; Fakis, M.; Polyzos, I.;
Persephonis, P. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 8726−8736; (d) Ji, S.-H.;
Shigeta, M.; Niko, Y.; Watanabe, J.; Konishi, G. Tetrahedron Lett.
2013, 54, 7103−7106; (e) Watanabe, H.; Ono, M.; Ariyoshi, T.;
Katayanagi, R.; Saji, H. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2017, 8,
1656−1662; (f) Safir Filho, M.; Fiorucci, S.; Martin, A. R.;
Benhida, R. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 13760−13772.
Figure 3. Fluorescence spectra of 1e in the solid state at 298 K.
6.
Valeur, B.; Berberan-Santos, M. N. In Molecular Fluorescence:
Principles and Applications, 2nd ed., Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
2013; pp 109−140.
side view
7.
8.
Hansch, C.; Leo, A.; Taft, R. W. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 165−195.
(a) Lee, C. T.; Yang, W. T.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37,
785−789; (b) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648−5652.
(c) Stephens, P. J.; Devlin, F. J.; Chabalowski, C. F.; Frisch, M. J.
J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 11623−11627.
(a)
(b)
A
A
A'
A'
A
9.
Strickler, S. J.; Berg, R. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1962, 37, 814−822.
A
10. Examples of fluorophores with a bulky substituent showing solid-
state fluorescence: (a) Shirai, K.; Matsuoka, M.; Fukunishi, K.
Dyes Pigm. 1999, 42, 95−101. (b) Ooyama, Y.; Okamoto, T.;
Yamaguchi, T.; Suzuki, T.; Hayashi, A.; Yoshida, K. Chem. Eur. J.
2006, 12, 7827−7838. (c) Zhang, D.; Wen, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Yu, G.;
Liu, Y.; Qian, X. Chem. Commun. 2008, 4777−4779. (d) Ozdemir,
T.; Atilgan, S.; Kutuk, I.; Yildirim, L. T.; Tulek, A.; Bayindir, M.;
Akkaya, E. U. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2105−2107. (e) Kubota, Y.;
Uehara, J.; Funabiki, K.; Ebihara, M.; Matsui, M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2010, 51, 6195−6198. (f) Hachiya, S.; Hashizume, D.; Ikeda,
H.; Yamaji, M.; Maki, S.; Niwa, H.; Hirano, T. J. Photochem.
Photobiol. A 2016, 331, 206−214.
A'
A'
top view
(c)
A'
A
Figure 4. The crystal structures of 1e; the side views (a) and (b),
and the top view (c) of the stair-like stacked structure. A and A’
designate molecules making the A/A’ dimeric units.