Chemistry Letters 2000
567
which resulted in low to moderate yields of the products after a
long reaction time. When the reactions were carried out with
10% CBr4 the cleavage requires longer reaction times and
anhydrous conditions to achieve comparable yields with 20%
CBr4. Neither expensive reagents nor overly acidic conditions
are employed. Further, no precautions need to be taken to
exclude moisture or oxygen from the reaction mixture. The
method is compatible with other functional groups like nitro,
cyano, olefinic, ester and cyclopropyl moieties in the molecule.
If an oxirane ring is present in the substrate, a competitive reac-
tion of nucleophilic ring opening of epoxide was observed
along with the cleavage of PMB group. Further, the carbohy-
drate derivative entry(s) which contains an isopropylidine
group, benzyl ether and glycosidic bond are unaffected under
the present reaction conditions. However the deprotection is
slow by CBr4 in refluxing acetonitrile, various functional
groups like acetates, THP ethers, epoxides and primary iso-
propylidine groups are unaffected.
The procedure for deprotection of PMB group is very sim-
ple. A mixture of ether (5 mmol) and CBr4 (1 mmol) in distilled
methanol (15 mL) was refluxed for an appropriate time as
required to complete the reaction. After complete conversion as
indicated by TLC, the reaction mass was cooled to room tem-
perature and diluted with water and extracted twice with ether
(2 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with
brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo
to yield crude product, which was purified by column chro-
matography on silica gel (Aldrich, 100–200 mesh, ethyl acetate:
hexane, 1:9) to afford pure alcohol.
makes it a useful addition to the existing methods.
BVS thanks CSIR, New Delhi for the award of fellowship.
References and Notes
1
a) T. W. Greene and P. G. M. Wuts, "Protective Groups in
Organic Synthesis", 3rd ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York
(1999). b) P. J. Kocienski, "Protecting Groups". Georg,
Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, New York (1994).
2
3
4
T. Akiyama, H. Shima, and S. Ozaki, Synlett, 1992, 415.
A. Bouzide and G. Sauve, Synlett, 1997, 1153.
N. Hebert, A. Beck, R. B. Lennox, and G. Just, J. Org.
Chem., 57, 1777 (1992).
5
6
7
8
A. Srikrishna, R. Viswajanani, J.A. Sattigeri, and D.
Vijaykumar, J. Org. Chem., 60, 5961 (1995).
T. Onoda, R. Shirai, and S. Iwasaki, Tetrahdron Lett., 38,
1443 (1997).
A. Cappa, E. Marcantoni, and E. Torregiani, J. Org.
Chem., 64, 5696 (1999).
a) K. Horita, T. Yoshioka, T. Tanaka, Y. Oikawa, and O.
Yonemitsu, Tetrahedron, 42, 3021 (1986). b) S.
Chandrasekhar, G. Sumithra, and J. S. Yadav, Tetrahedron
Lett., 37, 1645 (1996). c) R. Johansson and B. Saumelsson,
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 1, 1984, 2371. d) A. R. Vaino
and W. A. Szarek, Synlett, 1995, 1157.
9
L. Yan, and D. Kahne, Synlett, 1995, 523.
10 a) E. J. Corey and P. L. Fuchs, Tetrahedron Lett., 1972,
3769. b) A. Wagner, M. P. Heitz, and C. Mioskowski,
Tetrahedron Lett., 31, 3141 (1990). c) A.-S. -Y. Lee, F.-Y.
Su, and Y.-C. Liao, Tetrahedron Lett., 40, 1323 (1999). d)
C. Johnstone, W. J. Kerr, and J. S. Scott, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1996, 341.
In conclusion, the letter describes a mild and efficient pro-
cedure for the selective removal of PMB ether group in the
presence of benzyl ether using CBr4 in refluxing methanol. The
adopted procedure is simple, inexpensive, high yielding which
IICT Communication No. 4471.