2H), 4.60 (s, 2H), 1.03 (s, 9H). ESI-MS C23H25BrOSi [M-81Br]+,
[M-79Br]+, calcd 347.2, 345.2 found 347.2, 345.2.
The response of HPQF to fluoride ions was investigated.
Since HPQ is insoluble in aqueous media, HPQF exhibited quite
poor solubility due to its hydrophobic TBDPS group. Therefore,
we attempted to use organic solvents to make HPQF dissolved.
Enlightened by Tan and his co-workers21, tetrahydrofuran (THF)
was chosen to be the solvent to conduct the consequent reaction.
The Si-O bond of the HPQF can be easily cleaved by fluoride
ions to give the fluorescent product HPQ via spontaneously 1, 6-
elimination (Fig. 2). Once the phenolic hydroxyl group was
uncaged, the fluorescence can be excited by UV light. To
confirm the desilylation mechanism, LC-MS method was used to
give convinced evidence. HPQ was also synthesized to be a
reference compound. As shown in the liquid choromatography
(Fig. S4), the retention time of HPQ and HPQF are 3.36 min and
5.76 min, respectively. After the reaction conducted, the peak of
HPQF decreased significantly and the peak of HPQ arose
consequently, even though the baselines of the chromatograms
were not smooth enough. Obviously, the mass spectra results of
the corresponding time are consistent with the molecular weight
of HPQ and HPQF (Fig. S5 & S6).
2-hydroxybenzaldehyde (273.0 mg, 2.2 mmol)was dissolved
in acetonitrile (4 mL), then potassium carbonate (655.2 mg, 4.7
mmol) was added and stirred at room temperature for 10 min.
Compound 3 (850.6 mg, 2.0 mmol) was added and stirred
overnight. The solvent was removed, washed with water and
extracted with ethyl acetate. After filtering, the volatiles removed
and the residue was purified on a silica chromatography to give
1
the title compound as yellowish solid (625.2 mg, 67.1 %). H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) : 10.48 (s, 1H), 7.84 ~ 7.82 (m,
1H), 7.71 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 4H), 7.53 ~ 7.35 (m, 7H), 7.16 (d, J =
8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.05 ~ 7.00 (m, 2H), 6.78 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 5.03
(s, 2H), 1.10 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) :
189.75, 135.73, 135.47, 129.91, 128.70, 128.31, 127.75, 120.85,
119.89, 113.12, 70.40, 26.47ESI-MS C30H30O3Si [M+Na]+ calcd
489.2 found 489.2.
Compound 4 (550.6 mg, 1.18 mmol) and 2-aminobenzamide
(177.3 mg, 1.3 mmol) were dissolved in ethanol (40 mL) and
stirred at 0 ℃ for 10 min to form precipitation. The resulting
mixture was refluxed for 30 min. p-TSA (20 mg) was added and
the mixture was refluxed for 1 h. After cooled to room
temperature, 2, 3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (270.8
mg, 1.2 mmol) was added and stirred overnight with exposed to
the air. The precipitation was filtered out, washed with cold
ethanol and dried to give the HPQF (300.2 mg, 43.7 %). 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) : 10.96 (s, 1H), 8.53 (d, J = 6.99 Hz,
1H), 8.29 (d, J = 7.86 Hz, 1H), 7.77 ~ 7.70 (m, 6H), 7.48 ~ 7.35
(m, 8H), 7.20 ~ 7.13 (m, 3H), 7.07 (d, J = 8.31 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d,
J = 8.37 Hz, 2H), 5.19 (s, 2H), 1.11 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (75 MHz,
CDCl3) δ (ppm) : 161.69, 157.05, 156.05, 150.88, 149.43,
135.60, 134.45, 133.08, 132.73, 131.58, 130.03, 128.92, 127.90,
127.65, 126.48, 126.47, 122.14, 121.36, 120.54, 120.34, 113.91,
71.55, 26.57. ESI-HRMS C37H34N2O3Si [M+Na]+ calcd
605.22309 found 605.22552.
Fig. 3 (A) Fluorescence spectra of 200 μM HPQF response to different
concentration (0 – 2000 μM) TBAF, inset was the reaction mixture (left) and
HPQF solution (right); (B) Selectivity experiments of HPQF against a cast of
anions. TBAF was dissolved in THF and the reaction was conducted in THF
after adding HPQF. Other reactions were all carried on in aqueous media; (C)
Kinetic curve of HPQF with TBAF in THF solution. Excitation wavelength
350 nm.
Immediately prior to the imaging experiments, the cells were
washed with phosphate-buffered solution (PBS), incubated with
HPQF stock solution (final concentration 20 μM) for 60 min at
37 °C, then washed with PBS for three times. After incubated
with 100 μM TBAF for another 0.5 h at 37 °C, the HepG2 cells
were washed with PBS three times and imaging. Confocal
fluorescence imaging were observed under an LSM700 confocal
microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Excitation
wavelength of the laser was 405 nm. Emissions were set at 470–
530 nm.
Since the mechanism of sensing fluoride had been elucidated,
we put our attention on investigating the response of HPQF to
fluoride. TBAF was dissolved in THF and diluted into different
concentration (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000 and 2000 μM).
HPQF was dissolved in DMSO to give 20 mM stock solution. All
the reaction was conducted at room temperature for 30 min and
measured using Shimadzu RF5301 spectrometer.
Over the past decades, the strategy that desilylation of Si-O
bond was utilized frequently due to the high sensitivity and
selectivity. Si-O bond can be attacked by nucleophilic fluoride
ions easily, then the HPQ can be released through 1, 6-
elimination. As shown in Fig. 1 and Scheme 1, HPQF was
As shown in Fig. 3A
& B, HPQF exhibited good
concentration-dependent fluorescent properties and excellent
selectivity towards fluoride ions. Fluoride can be detected very
quickly by HPQF in a few seconds (Fig. 3C). Interestingly, the
reaction conducted in THF resulted in blue fluorescence which
was emitted by the keto form of HPQ molecule. We calculate the
limit of detection out as 140 nM.
1
designed, synthesized and fully characterized by H, 13C NMR
and HRMS (Detailed spectra can be found in Supplementary
Materials).
Since fluoride ions have multiple functions in physical and
pathological conditions, image fluoride ions in living cells could
provide clinicians more information for clinical diagnosis.
HepG2 cells were incubated with HPQF stock solution (final
concentration 20 μM) for 60 min and then exited under laser
confocal microscopy to detect fluoride in living cells (Fig. 4).
The cells was incubated with fluorides ions for 4 hours before the
HPQF was added. And from the left picture below we could see
Fig. 2 Proposed mechanism of the turn-on detection of fluoride by HPQF.