136
A. Alm aꢀ ssy et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 805 (2016) 130e138
Table 4
p p
Experimental data for (R,S )-3 and [Cu(R,S -3)Br].
Empirical formula
CCDC No.
C
43
H
39FeNP
2
((R,S
p
)-3)
43 2 p
C H39BrCuFeNP ([Cu(R,S -3)Br])
951497
687.58
1003402
830.99
M
r
Crystal system, space group
Orthorombic, P212121
determined from 23972 reflections
10.7370(2), 90
15.1527(3), 90
21.5290(4), 90
Orthorombic, P212121
determined from 11739 reflections
10.2549(4), 90
16.7919(7), 90
Unit cell dimensions
ꢁ
a [Å],
b [Å],
c [Å],
a
b
g
[ ]
ꢁ
[ ]
ꢁ
[ ]
21.9178(9), 90
V [Å3]
3502.64(12)
4, 1
0.554, 1.304
3774.2(3)
4, 1
2.123, 1.462
0
Z, Z
[mm 1],
ꢀ
r
(calcd.) [g cm
ꢀ3
]
m
F(000)
1440
1696
Absorption correction, Tmin, Tmax
Crystal size [mm]
Analytical, 0.574, 0.893
1.38 ꢂ 0.37 ꢂ 0.31
Prism, yellow
Gaussian integration with beam profile correction, 0.498, 0.686
0.48 ꢂ 0.36 ꢂ 0.24
Crystal habit, color
Block, orange
ꢁ
q
range for data collection [ ]
2.998e26.371
2.506e26.372
Limiting indices
h ¼ ꢀ13 / 13
h ¼ ꢀ12 / 11
k ¼ ꢀ18 / 18
k ¼ ꢀ17 / 20
l ¼ ꢀ26 / 26
l ¼ ꢀ27 / 26
Reflections collected/unique/observed
68302/7149/6750
[Rint ¼ 0.035, Friedel opposites not merged]
19545/7671/6038
[Rint ¼ 0.061, Friedel opposites not merged]
[
I > 2
s(I)]
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
Completeness to
q
[ ]
99.8%e26.371
99.8%e26.372
Data/restraints/parameters
Final weighting scheme
7149/2160/425
7671/544/444
2
2
2
2
2
2
w ¼ 1/[
s
(F
o
) þ (0.04P) þ 0.99P]
w ¼ 1/[
s
(F
o
) þ (0.0571P) þ 0.2505P]
2
2
2
2
where P ¼ [max(F
o
, 0) þ 2F
c
]/3
where P ¼ (F
o
þ 2F
c
)/3
Absolute structure determination
From anomalous dispersion effects
453 Friedel pairs using 2161 difference restraints
From anomalous dispersion effects
3370 Friedel pairs using 2258 quotients
Flack x factor ꢀ0.008(7)
1.030/1.033 (restrained)
R ¼ 4.36%, wR ¼ 9.98%
3
Flack x factor ꢀ0.0036(18)
S (goodness-of-fit)
1.0134
Final R indices [I > 2
s(I)]
R ¼ 2.96%, wR ¼ 7.37%
R ¼ 3.22%, wR ¼ 7.61%
0.53/e0.36
Final R indices (all data)
R ¼ 6.28%, wR ¼ 10.91%
0.598/e0.445
Largest difference peak/hole [e Åꢀ3]
7
6
4
1
.46e7.57 (m, 4H, H-CPh), 7.29e7.46 (m, 11 H, H-CPh), 7.16e7.28 (m,
131.4, 130.8 (JC,P ¼ 15.4 Hz), 130.4, 130.0, 129.8 (JC,P ¼ 9.2 Hz), 129.0
(JC,P ¼ 9.4 Hz), 128.9 (JC,P ¼ 5.2 Hz), 128.8 (JC,P ¼ 8.8 Hz), 128.4
(JC,P ¼ 6.9 Hz), 128.4 (JC,P ¼ 6.0 Hz), 127.3 (JC,P ¼ 5.0 Hz), 98.7
Ph
a
H, H-C ), 5.39e5.47 (dd, JH,P ¼ 7.4 Hz, JH,P ¼ 4.7 Hz, 1H, H-C ),
Fc
Fc
.62e4.72 (m, 1H, H-C ), 4.36e4.41 (m, 1H, H-C ), 4.08e4.11 (m,
Fc
13
H, H-C ), 3.36 (s, 5H, Cp), 1.53 (s, 6H, NMe
2
) ppm. C NMR (CDCl
3
,
(JC,P ¼ 20.3 Hz), 71.3, 71.2, 70.7 (JC,P ¼ 4.0 Hz), 70.3 (C
5
H
5
), 63.8, 44.8
ꢁ
31
ꢁ
150.8 MHz, 20 C, TMS):
d
¼ 149.8 (JC,P ¼ 24.8 Hz), 140.5
(N-(CH
J
3
)
2
) ppm. P NMR (CDCl
3
, 242.8 MHz, 20 C):
d
¼ ꢀ12.2 (d,
(J
C,P ¼ 10.6 Hz), 139.7 (JC,P ¼ 12.0 Hz), 137.7 (JC,P ¼ 14.4 Hz), 136.6
C,P ¼ 16.9 Hz), 135.3 (JC,P ¼ 22.0 Hz), 134.7 (JC,P ¼ 20.0 Hz), 134.2,
P,P ¼ 150 Hz); ꢀ18.8 (d, JP,P ¼ 150 Hz) ppm.
(J
1
34.1 (JC,P ¼ 19.1 Hz), 132.9 (JC,P ¼ 18.9 Hz), 128.7, 127.1
p 4
4.4. Synthesis of complex [Rh(R,S -3)cod.BF ]
(J
C,P ¼ 64.7 Hz), 132.6 (JC,P ¼ 18.0 Hz), 128.7, 128.5 (JC,P ¼ 6.5 Hz),
1
28.4 (JC,P ¼ 39.6 Hz), 128.3 (JC,P ¼ 14.0 Hz), 127.8 (JC,P ¼ 7.9 Hz),
To the solution of ligand (R,S
p
-3) (12.3 mg, 0.18 mmol) in dry
].BF (7.3 mg, 0.18 mmol). The
127.6 (JC,P ¼ 5.9 Hz), 127.4 (JC,P ¼ 64.6 Hz), 70.6 (br s), 70.1, 69.9, 69.5
CH
2
Cl (1.5 mL) was added [Rh(cod)
2
2
4
31
ꢁ
(
br s), 64.7 (br s), 44.0 ppm. P NMR (CDCl , 242.8 MHz, 20 C):
3
mixture was stirred for 2 h at RT. Product was precipitated by
addition of hexane. Orange crystals were filtered off and washed
d
6
¼ ꢀ18.1 (d, JP,P ¼ 39.6 Hz), ꢀ27.0 (d, JP,P ¼ 39.6 Hz) ppm. MS (m/z):
þ
43.3 [M - NMe
2
] .
with hexane. Product was recrystallized from CH
2
Cl
¼ 8.19e8.27 (m, 1H),
.90e8.02 (m, 2H), 7.64e7.77 (m, 4H), 6.88e7.49 (m, 17H),
2
/hexane.
1
ꢁ
3
H NMR (CDCl , 600 MHz, 20 C, TMS): d
7
4.3. Synthesis of complex [Cu(R,Sp-3)Br]
6.26e6.41 (m, 2H), 5.82e5.92 (m, 1H), 5.23e5.29 (m, 1H),
3
NMe
.82e3.69 (m, 2H), 3.45 (s, 5H, Cp), 1.90e2.90 (m, 8H), 2.63 (s, 6H,
A mixture of ligand (R,S
2.0 mg, 0.01 mmol) and dry CH
through the short basic alumina pad), was stirred for 1 h at RT until
the white cuprous salt dissolved. The solvent was evaporated under
vacuum, and the yellow precipitate was recrystallized from CH
p
)-3 (6.7 mg, 0.01 mmol), CuBr.Me
2
S
13
ꢁ
2
) ppm. C NMR (CDCl
3
, 150.8 MHz, 20 C, TMS):
d
¼ 155.6,
(
2
2
Cl (1.5 mL, neutralized by passing
1
1
1
55.4, 138.0, 137.2, 136.6, 133.9, 133.5, 133.3, 132.4, 132.1, 131.2,
30.8, 130.0, 129.9, 129.5, 129.3, 129.1, 128.9, 128.9, 128.7, 128.2,
28.1, 127.4, 127.3, 126.8, 126.7, 105.1, 104.9, 74.4, 73.8, 73.3, 71.9,
2 2
Cl /
31
71.3, 70.8, 70.6, 70.3, 70.2, 69.1, 69.0, 46.6, 31.9, 30.4 ppm. P NMR
hexane to yield 6.2 mg (81%) of yellow crystals. The crystallographic
sample was obtained by recrystallization from CHCl
ꢁ
(CDCl
3
, 242.8 MHz, 20 C):
d
¼ 13.0 (dd, JRh,P ¼ 136.9 Hz,
3
/hexane.
1
ꢁ
JP,P ¼ 18.6 Hz), 10.6 (dd, JRh,P ¼ 138.8 Hz, JP,P ¼ 18.6 Hz) ppm.
H NMR (CDCl
3
, 600 MHz, 20 C, TMS):
d
¼ 8.03e7.88 (m, 3H, H-
CPh); 8.01e7.97 (m, 1H, H-C ); 7.95e7.89 (m, 2H, H-C ); 7.86e7.81
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
(
C
(
4
1
d
1
m, 2H, H-C ); 7.81e7.76 (m, 2H, H-C ); 7.58e7.52 (m, 10H, H-
4.5. X-ray structure determination
Ph
Ph
Ph
); 7.42e7.37 (m, 1H, H-C ); 7.37e7.31 (m, 5H, H-C ); 7.14e7.09
Ph
Fc
m, 1H, H-C ); 5.27e5.21 (m, 1H, HCN); 4.83e4.77 (m, 1H, H-C );
.47e4.44 (m, 1H, H-C ); 4.04e4.00 (m, 1H, H-C ); 3.51 (s, 5H, Cp);
The intensity data for (R,S
on a Kuma KM-4 CCD -axis diffractometer using graphite-
monochromated MoK radiation (0.71073 Å) at room tempera-
ture (293 K). The diffraction intensities were corrected for Lorentz,
polarization and absorption effects. Data collection, cell refinement,
p p
)-3 and [Cu(R,S -3)Br] were collected
Fc
Fc
k
13
ꢁ
.28 (s, 6H, NMe
2
) ppm. C NMR (CDCl
¼ 151.1 (JC,P ¼ 14.8 Hz), 135.6 (JC,P ¼ 15.3 Hz), 135.3 (JC,P ¼ 15.6 Hz),
34.0 (JC,P ¼ 14.0 Hz), 133.8, 133.6 (JC,P ¼ 14.7 Hz), 131.8, 131.6, 131.5,
3
, 150.8 MHz, 20 C, TMS):
a