C. Wang et al. / Catalysis Communications 11 (2010) 758–762
761
Table 5
The comparison of different allylic oxidation in the presence of NHPI.
Entry
Substance
Time (h)
Conversion (%)
Selectivity (%)
Ketone
Alcohol
Epoxy
Other
1
a
b-IP
Cyclohexene
Cyclohexenone
-IP
10
10
5
15.4
45.6
64.8
4.4
77.2
91.1
55.4
46.4
4.5
1.4
9.7
6.8
2.6
Trace
3.6
15.7
1.0
31.3
41.4
2a
3
4b
10
5.4
Reaction conditions: 100 mmol substrate, NHPI 5.0 mmol, 60 °C.
a
Pyridine (40 ml) was used as solvent.
BPO (0.3 mmol) was added as co-catalyst.
b
amount of NHPI increases up to 7 mol%. Therefore, 5 mol% is con-
sidered as a preferable amount of NHPI.
gated with carbonyl group, which is the reason why the selectivity
of KIP (3) in the oxidation of
of the time [37].
a-IP (1) decreased with the increasing
The separation of NHPI and KIP (3) is very easy because NHPI is
immiscible with a-IP (1) and KIP (3) at low temperature. When the
oxidation finished, after cooling down the reaction mixture to 0 °C,
NHPI was separated from the organic phase by centrifuging, which
could be used in the subsequent reaction. The structure of recycled
NHPI was confirmed using IR spectra, 1H NMR, and ESI-MS, which
was shown in Fig. 1. It was clear that there was not obvious differ-
ence between the recycled NHPI and the fresh NHPI. In order to ac-
cess the influence of the recycled NHPI on the oxidation, five
recycling runs were carried out under the same condition. It was
seen in Table 4 that the NHPI could be recycled with a slight loss
of its activity. It seemed that the NHPI could have the potential
to be used more than five times.
4. Conclusion
In summary,
a-IP (1) can be directly oxidized to KIP (3) with
atmospheric oxygen by NHPI. The effect of co-catalyst on the oxi-
dation was investigated and the results showed that the co-cata-
lyst was not necessary in the aerobic oxidation of
catalyzed by NHPI. Especially, the oxidation of -IP (1) catalyzed
by NHPI was carried out well under 60 °C for 10 h, while the tradi-
tional oxidation of -IP (1) was usually at high temperature. Fur-
a-IP (1)
a
a
thermore, the separation and recycling of NHPI were easy with a
slight loss on its activity. Possible reaction pathways for the oxida-
Based on previous reports and the observed reaction products,
tion of
a-IP (1) were presented, which indicated that the byprod-
the possible oxidation pathways of
a-IP catalyzed by NHPI could
ucts such as dimer and polymers produced easily when the
double bond is conjugated with carbonyl group. Considering the
advantage such as aerobic oxidation, metal and solvent-free pro-
cess, this oxidation catalyzed by NHPI provided a potentially new
way for the synthesis of KIP (3) in industry.
be postulated, which was shown in Scheme 3. Firstly, NHPI can
be converted to phthalimide N-oxylradical (PINO). The hydrogen
atom of
(8), which further led to the formation of
and the corresponding -IP hydroperoxide (4). Then
a
-IP (1) was abstracted by PINO to produce
-IP peroxy radical (9)
-IP hydro-
a-IP radical
a
a
a
peroxide (4) was directly decomposed to KIP (3) and HIP (5). It is
well known that alkyl hydroperoxide (4) is the initial intermediate
Acknowledgement
in the oxidation of hydrocarbon [33–35]. In the oxidation of
KIP catalyzed by NHPI, it was confirmed by the addition of tri-
phenyl phosphate (TPP) because -IP hydroperoxide (4) could be
quantitatively reduced to the HIP (5) by TPP at room temperature
[34,35]. On the other hand, -IP peroxy radical (9) can add to the
double bond in -IP to produce the more stable b-peroxy radical
(10) [36]. The b-peroxy radical (10) reacted with O2 to give the
new peroxy radical (11) and further converted to the dimer hydro-
peroxide (7) and polymer, which was detected by ESI-MS. It is re-
ported that the greater the stability of b-peroxy alkyl radical, the
more likely it is to react with oxygen rather than to undergo uni-
molecular decomposition to produce OIP (6) [37]. Thus the dimer
hydroperoxide (7) and polymer are main products, and OIP (6) is
a-IP to
This work was supported by National Natural Science Founda-
tion of China (Nos. 20990221, 20704035).
a
References
a
a
[1] E.F. Murphy, T. Mallat, A. Baiker, Catal. Today 57 (2000) 115.
[2] H. Ernst, Pure Appl. Chem. 74 (2002) 2213.
[3] J.Y. Mao, N. Li, H.R. Li, X.B. Hu, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 258 (2006) 178.
[4] S.B. Halligudi, N.K.K. Raj, S.S. Deshpande, S. Gopinathan, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
157 (2000) 9.
[5] N. Ito, T. Etoh, H. Hagiwara, M. Kato, Synthesis (1997) 153.
[6] M. Beyrhouty, A.B. Sorokin, S. Daniele, L.G. Hubert-Pfalzgraf, New J. Chem. 29
(2005) 1245.
[7] M. Costantini, A. Dromard, M. Jouffret, B. Brossard, J. Varagnat, J. Mol. Catal. 7
(1980) 89.
[8] J.Y. Mao, X.B. Hu, H. Li, Y. Sun, C.M. Wang, Z.R. Chen, Green Chem. 10 (2008)
827.
trace in the oxidation of a-IP (1).
For further verifying of the mechanism of catalytic oxidation,
the oxidation of b-IP (2), cyclohexene, and cyclohexenone cata-
lyzed by NHPI was also carried out, which was given in Table 5.
It was clear that the selectivity of KIP (3) was more than 90%,
and the other byproducts such as polymer were only about 1%
when b-IP (2) was oxidized in the same condition, while the selec-
tivity of KIP (3) was only 77.2%, and the other byproducts such as
[9] X.B. Hu, J.Y. Mao, Y. Sun, H. Chen, H.R. Li, Catal. Commun. 10 (2009) 1908.
[10] C. Beck, T. Mallat, A. Baiker, J. Catal. 195 (2000) 79.
[11] E.F. Murphy, A. Baiker, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 179 (2002) 233.
[12] E.F. Murphy, M. Schneider, T. Mallat, A. Baiker, Synthesis (2001) 547.
[13] T. Joseph, S.B. Halligudi, C. Satyanarayan, D.P. Sawant, S. Gopinathan, J. Mol.
Catal. A: Chem. 168 (2001) 87.
[14] E.F. Murphy, T. Mallat, A. Baiker, M. Schneider, Appl. Catal., A 197 (2000) 295.
[15] A. Hanyu, Y. Sakurai, S. Fujibayashi, S. Sakaguchi, Y. Ishii, Tetrahedron Lett. 38
(1997) 5659.
[16] D. Kishore, A.E. Rodrigues, Catal. Commun. 8 (2007) 1156.
[17] D. Kishore, A.E. Rodrigues, Appl. Catal., A 345 (2008) 104.
[18] F. Recupero, C. Punta, Chem. Rev. 107 (2007) 3800.
[19] F. Rajabi, B. Karimi, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 232 (2005) 95.
[20] B. Karimi, J. Rajabi, Synthesis (2003) 2373.
[21] Y. Ishii, S. Sakaguchi, T. Iwahama, Adv. Synth. Catal. 343 (2001) 393.
[22] Y. Ishii, T. Iwahama, S. Sakaguchi, K. Nakayama, Y. Nishiyama, J. Org. Chem. 61
(1996) 4520.
polymer were more than 15% for
a-IP (1). The difference between
a-IP (1) and b-IP (2) is the position of carbon–carbon double bond.
The former is conjugated with carbonyl group, but the latter is not.
Similarly, the higher selectivity of ketone and the lower other
byproducts were obtained for cyclohexene, compared with that
of cyclohexenone. Therefore, the results showed that the addition
which resulted in the dimer and polymer is favored over the
abstraction of an allylic hydrogen when the double bond is conju-
[23] R.A. Sheldon, I. Arends, Adv. Synth. Catal. 346 (2004) 1051.
[24] R.A. Sheldon, I. Arends, A. Dijksman, Catal. Today 57 (2000) 157.