Ph
Me
30
[NiI]
STol
(a)
Me
S
[NiI]
Ph
S
•
TolS
20
10
(b)
[NiI]
(CH2)nPh
S
Me
•
Ph
•
TolS
SPh
10
20
S-Tol
t / h
n = 1,3
(c)
Fig. 1 The time course of the formationn of disulfides (5) 3 and (8) 4
(d)
Fig. 2 Possible reaction modes of the sulfuranyl radical
gas of the reaction vessel showed the evident formation of
methane, although the yield could not be determined due to the
solubility of methane in MeCN. Irradiation of the same mixture
containing an equivalent amount of compound 7 gave com-
pound 8‡ in 12% yield. The formation of 8 and ditolyl disulfide
4 shows the intervention of the toluenethiyl radical (Scheme
4).
phenylalkane. Thus the transition state (c) of the nickel attack
must be more hindered than the transition state (a) in which the
least bulky methyl group is the reaction centre, and the present
reaction seems to be under severe steric control. On the other
hand, steric control is less important for mode (b) because the
reaction centre is a sulfuranyl radical.
Finally, we detected a trace amount of methyl tolyl sulfide 6
from the present model reaction, and the methyl group on the
sulfuranyl radical (a) seems to swing to some extent through a
transition state (d). We are studying the effect of this methyl
migration on the present intramolecular methyl transfer of
biomimetic type.
Me
Me
Bz-O
N
O•
Me
Me
We thank Waseda University and the Ministry of Education,
Sports, and Culture of Japan for their financial support through
the Annual Project Program (95A-252) and a 1997 Grant-in-aid
(09640649) respectively.
hn
Me
Me
Me
S(O)Tol
Me
+
Bz-O
N
(TolS)2
Footnotes and References
* E-mail: mtada@mn.waseda.ac.jp
† An MeCN solution (10 cm3) of the reaction mixture was irradiated by a
Rayonett Photoreactor equipped with 350 nm lamps for the specified
periods. The products were identified by comparison with authentic
material. The time course of the product yields was determined by gas
chromatography using internal standards.
‡ We prefer the sulfinylamide structure 8 formed by the rearrangement of
the direct radical coupling product because the base peak in the mass
spectrum is seen at m/z 139, showing the existence of TolS(O), but only a
weak peak corresponding to (TolS) was seen.
§ Addition of piperidine to those neutral complexes did not produce a major
spectral change, but the UV absorption maxima of complex A (385.0 and
409.5 nm in EtOH) were replaced by maxima at 340.0, 454.5 and 578
(broad) nm or by a broad absorption band at ca. 560 nm upon addition of
piperidine or toluenethiolate ion.
Scheme 4
Other nickel(ii) complexes B–D showed some catalytic
activity, although with less efficiency, and the yields of 3 after
6 h irradiation are shown in parentheses beneath their structures.
Neutral complexes such as bis(dimethylglyoximato)nickel(ii)
and tetraphenylporphyrin–nickel(ii) showed no activity.§ For-
mation of the mixed disulfide was not observed when either the
nickel(ii) complex or irradiation was absent. This reaction
catalysed by the nickel(ii) complex A is summarized by Scheme
5 and the net reaction is written as eqn. (2).
TolS2 + MeSPh + H+ ? TolSSPh + CH4
(2)
1 W. E. Balch, G. E. Fox, L. J. Woose and R. S. Wolfe, Microbiol. Rev.,
1979, 43, 260; R. H. Crabtree, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 987.
2 C. R. Wooser and G. E. Fox, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1977, 74,
5088.
3 A. A. DiMarco, T. A. Bobik and R. S. Wolfe, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 1990,
59, 355; R. S. Wolfe, Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 1991, 45, 1; B. Jaun, Metal
ions in biological systems, ed. H. Siegel and A. Siegel, Marcel Dekker,
New York, 1993, vol. 29, ch. 9, p. 287.
There are two possible action modes of the nickel complex as
shown in Fig. 2; (a) an SH2 type substitution on the methyl
group or (b) a ligand coupling on the hypervalent state sulfur.7
We prefer mode (a) because the use of w-phenylalkyl
phenylsulfide instead of thioanisole yields no mixed sulfide and
4 R. P. Gunsalus and R. S. Wolfe, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 1978, 3, 191;
A. Pfaltz, D. A. Livingston, B. Jaun, D. Diekert, R. K. Thauer and
A. Eschenmoser, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1985, 68, 133.
Me
MeSPh
TolS• + [NiI]
Tol SS Ph
•
5 (a) B. Jaun, Helv., 1990, 73, 2209; (b) A. Berkessel, Bioorg. Chem., 1991,
19, 101.
hn
6 B. Jaun and A. Pfaltz, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1988, 293;
S. P. J. Albracht, D. Ankel-Fuchs, R. Bocher, J. Ellermann, J. Moll,
J. W. Van Der Zwaan and R. K. Thauer, Biochem. Biophys. Acta, 1988,
955, 86.
TolS-[Ni]
TolS–
+ [Ni]-Me
H+
TolSSPh
7 S. Oae, Rev. Heteroatom Chem., Myu, Tokyo, 1988, vol. 1, p. 304; 1991,
vol. 4, p. 195.
[NiII] + CH4
Scheme 5
Received in Cambridge, UK, 21st July 1997; 7/05187E
2162
Chem. Commun., 1997