Na2PdCl4 in the water core. This is followed by bubbling
hydrogen through the system. The system was stirred at 30 °C
and samples were taken every minute to monitor the amounts of
the reactant and the product using TLC and NMR spectroscopy.
The amount of the olefin added to the solution was about two
orders of magnitude greater than that of the total palladium
present in the system. The hydrogen gas serves a dual purpose
of reducing Pd ions as well as the starting material for the
hydrogenation process as shown in Scheme 1.
less than 45% after 1 hour of reaction under the same reaction
condition. In the case of the palladium nanoparticles dispersed
by the water-in-oil microemulsion, however, the product,
10-propylanthracene,8 was detected with more than 50% by
NMR after 9 minutes of reaction.
The formation of palladium nanoparticles in the AOT
microemulsion was also studied using different solvents
including ethyl acetate, dimethyl formamide, toluene, chloro-
form and dichloromethane. Chloroform and dichloromethane
are not able to form a stable water-in-oil microemulsion with
AOT and a Na2PdCl4 solution. Ethyl acetate, dimethyl
formamide and toluene are able to form water-in-oil micro-
emulsion with AOT and a solution of Na2PdCl4. Other factors
such as the W value,9 temperature,10 amount and nature of
surfactant11 can also affect the stability of the microemulsion
and consequently the catalytic efficiency of the metal nano-
particles. Extensive studies of these parameters are currently in
progress.
The Pd nanoparticles formed in the water/AOT/n-hexane
microemulsion at W = 15 was stable for about 15–20 minutes.
After that aggregation of nanoparticles would occur and black
Pd particles became visible in the solution. The Pd particles
could be separated from the hexane solution by filtration. We
could also recover AOT by adding an acid solution (e.g. 6 M
HCl) to hexane and AOT would partition favorably in the acid
solution.12
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that palladium nano-
particles dispersed by a water-in-oil microemulsion are very
efficient catalysts for hydrogenation of olefins in an organic
solvent. This approach can be applied to other metal catalyst
systems including platinum, rhodium, nickel, etc. The concept
of homogenation of heterogeneous catalysis by dispersing
nanoparticles in solutions described in this paper may have a
wide range of applications in organic synthesis and in industrial
manufacturing processes.
The results of hydrogenation of the three olefins catalyzed by
the Pd nanoparticles dispersed in the hexane solution by the
microemulsion are summarized in Table 1. In the case of
1-phenyl-1-cyclohexene, the reactant was not detectable by
NMR after 5 minutes of reaction. Only the product 1-phenyl-
1-cyclohexane shown in Scheme 1 was detected. From the
detection limit of the NMR peak of the reactant, we estimated
the conversion yield to be > 97%. A control experiment was
also done without Na2PdCl4 in the water core of the micro-
emulsion. In this case, only the reactant 1-phenyl-1-cyclohex-
ene was detected under the specified experimental conditions
indicating Pd nanoparticles were responsible for the catalytic
hydrogenation. The hydrogenation reaction was also carried out
using commercial Pd/C catalyst under the same conditions
except in the absence of the microemulsion. About 1.7 mg of the
Pd/C (0.17 mg, 1.6 mmol of Pd) was used in this experiment.
The total amount of Pd in this case was the same equivalent for
the microemulsion experiment. The system was stirred and
samples were taken at different times and analyzed by the
procedure described above. The conversion was about 50%
after 20 minutes of reaction, After 40 minutes of reaction, the
conversion was more than 97%. The palladium nanoparticles
dispersed by the microemulsion in the organic solvent is
obviously more efficient than the conventional Pd/C catalyst.
This work was supported by a DEPSCoR grant (DAAD19-
01-0458) and by the Idaho NSF-EPSCoR Program (EPS-
0132626)
Scheme 1 Hydrogenation of 1-phenyl-1-cyclohexene
The results of hydrogenation of the other two olefins, methyl
trans-cinnamate and trans-stilbene, catalyzed by microemul-
sion dispersed palladium nanoparticles (Table 1) are similar to
that of 1-phenyl-1-cyclohexene described above. Virtually all of
the starting olefins were converted to the saturated hydro-
carbons in 6–7 minutes. Using the conventional Pd/C catalyst,
the conversion was 60% after 20 min for methyl trans-
cinnamate and 68% after 40 min for trans-stilbene. Quantitative
comparison of hydrogenation activity of the Pd nanoparticles in
microemulsion versus conventional Pd/C catalysts requires
detail knowledge about mass transport processes from the bulk
solvent to the particle surface and the effective surface area that
is not available at the present time. Research along this direction
is currently in progress.
Notes and references
1 R. Vitali, G. Caccia and R. Gardi, J Org. Chem, 1972, 37, 3745; L. E.
Overman and G. H. Jessup, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1978, 100, 5179; G. A.
Olah and G. K. Surya Prakash, S, 1978, 397.
2 H. Ohde, C. M. Wai, H. Kim, J. Kim and M. Ohde, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2002, 124, 4540.
3 H. Sato, T. Ohtsu and I. Komasawa, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 2002, 35,
255.
4 D. M. de Jesus and M. Spiro, Langmuir, 2000, 16, 4896.
5 A. Henglein, J. Phys. Chem. B., 2000, 104, 6683; T. Teranish and M.
Miyake, Chem. Mater., 1998, 10, 594.
6 W. Baik, C. H. Yoon, K. C. Lee, H. J. Lee, S. Koo, J. Kim, B. Yoon and
H. Kim, J. Chem. Res. (S)., 1998, 358.
7 B. Yoon, Master’s thesis, Department of Chemistry, Kyung Hee
University, Seoul, Korea, 1998.
Another challenging test was the catalytic hydrogenation of
monoalkylated anthracene, 10-(3-propenyl)anthracene as
shown in Scheme 2. This molecule was synthesized from a
monoalkylated anthrone derivative.6 The monoalkylated an-
thracene derivative, 10-(3-propenyl)anthracene,7 showed rela-
tively poor hydrogenation in Pd/C catalyst. The conversion was
8 TLC (Rf: 0.59, EA+Hex = 1+20) and NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.32(s,
1H), d 8.27(d, J = 5.25, 2H), d 7.97(d, J = 8.04, 2H), d 7.39–7.46(m,
4H), d 3.53(t, J = 8.05, 2H), 1.82(m, 2H), d 1.09(t, J = 7.35, 3H).
9 A. Maitra, J. Phys. Chem., 1984, 88, 5122; A. Hanmouda, Th. Gulik and
M. P. Pileni, Langmuir, 1995, 11, 3635; J. Yano, H. Furedi-Milhofer, E.
Wachtel and N. Garti, Langmuir, 2000, 16, 9996.
10 Q. Li, T. Li and J. Wu, J. Phys. Chem. B., 2000, 104, 9011; S. Burauer,
T. Sottmann and R. Strey, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 1999, 1, 4299.
11 S. Ahuja and J. Cohen, Anal. Profiles Drug Subst., 1983, 12, 713; K. N.
Bakeer, S. A. Chugunov, I. Teraoka, W. J. Macknight, A. B. Zezin and
V. A. Kabanov, Macromolecules., 1994, 27, 3926; M. Bujan, M. Sikiric,
N. Filipovic-Vincekovic, N. Vdovic, N. Garti and H. Furedi-Milhofer,
Langmuir, 2001, 17, 646.
12 I. Casero, D. Sicilia, S. Rubio and D. Perez-Bendito, Anal. Chem, 1999,
71, 4519.
Scheme 2 Hydrogenation of 10-(3-propenyl)anthracene
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 1040–1041
1041