Kirsten Zeitler and Ina Mager
COMMUNICATIONS
Experimental Section
Supporting Information
General experimental conditions, preparation of catalysts
and characterization of compounds.
General Procedure for the Immobilization via Cu-
Catalyzed [3+2]-Cycloaddition
A round-bottom flask was charged with MeOPEG-azide
[
26]
3
(0.20 mmol) and 6 mL of a degassed 1:1 mixture of H O
2
and t-BuOH. To this solution was added the propargylated Acknowledgements
heterazolium salt 2 (1.2 equivs.). After the subsequent addi-
tion of ascorbic acid (0.2 equivs.) and CuBr (6 mol%) the
solution was allowed to stir at ambient temperature for 24 h
We thank the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie for a Liebig
fellowship (K. Zeitler), the Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt
(DBU) for a graduate scholarship (I. Mager) and Prof.
Oliver Reiser for his encouragement and support.
(
typically). The mixture was extracted three times with
CH Cl ; the combined organic phases were washed with
2
2
water, brine and dried over MgSO . Concentration under
4
vacuum, followed by precipitation with Et O and subse-
2
quent filtration afforded the immobilized catalyst as a color-
References
less solid in analytical purity. Catalyst loading was deter-
1
mined by H NMR using the MeOPEG-OCH signal as ref-
3
[
1] a) A. Berkessel, H. Grçger, Asymmetric Organocataly-
sis, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 2005; b) special issue: Acc.
Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 487–631; c) special issue: Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1007–1249; d) P. I. Dalko, L.
Moisan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3726–3748;
e) P. I. Dalko, L. Moisan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004,
erence.
General Procedure for the Intramolecular Stetter
Reaction with MeOPEG-Thiazolium Precatalysts
To an oven-dried screw-capped, N -filled test tube was
2
4
3, 5138–5175; f) J. Seayad, B. List, Org. Biomol.
added thiazolium precatalyst 5 (0.020 mmol, 10 mol%) and
Chem. 2005, 3, 719–724.
0
.6 mL dry CHCl . To this solution was added DIPEA
3
[
2] a) N. Marion, S. Díez-Gonzµlez, S. P. Nolan, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 2988–3000; b) D. Enders, T.
Balensiefer, Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 534–541.
3] K. Zeitler, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7506–7510.
4] a) M. He, G. J. Uc, J. W. Bode, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
(
0.20 mmol, 1 equiv.) and the mixture was stirred at ambient
temperature for 10 min. Subsequently, substrate aldehyde
0.20 mmol, 1 equiv.) was added and the resulting solution
(
[
[
was allowed to stir at room temperature for 18 h (TLC con-
trol).
Work-up procedure A: After addition of some silica the
mixture was stirred for 15 min, followed by filtration to
yield the chromanone product.
1
28, 15088–15089; b) M. He, J. R. Struble, J. W. Bode,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8418–8420; c) for a relat-
ed intramolecular Michael reaction, see: E. M. Phillips,
M. Wadamoto, A. Chan, K. A. Scheidt, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3107–3110.
Work-up procedure B (catalyst recycling): After cooling
to 08C the reaction mixture was treated with Et O to pre-
2
[
[
5] P.-C. Chiang, J. Kaeobamrung, J. W. Bode, J. Am.
cipitate the catalyst and filtered. After washing with Et O
2
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3520–3521.
and drying under vacuum the separated catalyst could be
reused. The resulting filtrate was washed with small amounts
of H O, dried over MgSO and concentrated under reduced
6] This is especially attractive to avoid elaborate separa-
tion techniques as, e.g., provided in continous-flow sys-
tems: a) G. Jas, A. Kirschning, Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9,
2
4
pressure to afford pure product.
5
708–5723; b) A. M. Hafez, A. E. Taggi, T. Dudding,
T. Lectka, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10853–10859.
7] For a detailed discussion on this topic, see: a) F. Cozzi,
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 1367–1390; b) M. Bena-
glia, New J. Chem. 2006, 30, 1525–1533.
[8] a) A. Kirschning, H. Monenschein, R. Wittenberg,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 650–679; b) S. V. Ley,
I. R. Baxendale, R. N. Bream, P. S. Jackson, A. G.
Leach, D. A. Longbottom, M. Nesi, J. S. Scott, R. I.
Storer, S. J. Taylor, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000,
3815–4195; c) S. Kobayashi, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
2000, 4, 338–345.
[9] In addition, several approaches for the immobilization
of NHC ligands, mainly for Pd or Ru complexes, have
been reported; a) W. J. Sommer, M. Weck, Coord.
Chem. Rev. 2007, 251, 860–873; b) B. Karimi, D.
Enders, Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1237–1240; c) D. Enders, H.
Gielen, J. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 617–618, 70–80.
[10] Z.-Z. Zhou, F.-Q. Ji, M. Cao, G.-F. Yang, Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2006, 348, 1826–1830.
[
General Procedure for the Redox Esterification with
MeOPEG-Imidazolium Precatalysts
To an oven-dried screw-capped, N -filled test tube was
2
added imidazolium precatalyst 8 (0.020 mmol, 5 mol%), and
suspended in 0.6 mL dry toluene. To this mixture was added
sequentially alkynal aldehyde (0.40 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) in
0.3 mL in dry toluene, alcohol (1.2 mmol, 3 equivs.) and fi-
nally DMAP (0.020 mmol, 5 mol%). After exchange of the
septum with a screw cap, the sealed tube was stirred at 608C
for 2 to 12 h (TLC control). The mixture was then cooled to
0
8C, the catalyst was precipitated upon addition of Et O
2
and filtered off (the so obtained catalyst can be reused in
further reaction cycles without need of purification). The re-
sulting solution was washed with 1.1M KHSO solution and
4
brine and dried over MgSO . Concentration under reduced
4
pressure afforded the pure unsaturated ester.
Alternatively, addition of small amounts of silica and sub-
sequent filtration yielded the product in similar purity, al-
though without the possibility to recycle the catalyst.
[11] A. G. M. Barrett, A. C. Love, L. Tedeschi, Org. Lett.
2004, 6, 3377–3380, and references cited therein.
1856
ꢁ 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 1851 – 1857