we optimized conditions for substituting palladium acetate
for Pd(PPh , and the palladium content could be increased
We tested the catalytic activity of 1 in epoxide hydro-
genolysis to give alcohols. This reductive cleavage reaction
8
3
)
4
up to 10 wt % without losing activity per mol of Pd.
Furthermore, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles
were able to be readily mixed with the suspension of
palladium nanoparticles before gelation. Palladium nano-
particles were produced from a solution of palladium acetate,
has traditionally been carried out by using stoichiometric
metal hydrides, in which the problem of waste salts is
unavoidable. Therefore, much attention has been paid to
9
the catalytic hydrogenolysis of epoxides with molecular
1
0
hydrogen or ammonium formate. However, the previous
catalyst systems are not suitable to industrial applications
because of low yield, low selectivity, low catalyst durability,
and/or harsh and complex reaction conditions. For example,
the reaction with [Cp*RuCl(cod)] requires the addition of
an amine ligand and a strong base under 10 atm of hydrogen
3
Al(O-sec-Bu) , 2-butanol, and THF. Iron oxide nanoparticles
dispersed in ethanol were added to the resulting black
5
suspension. Then, water was added to form black gel. The
gel was isolated by filtration, washed with acetone, and dried
at 120 °C for 5 h to give 1 as dark brown powder (Scheme
10d
1).
pressure. The use of Pd/C-ethylenediamine complex shows
a good selectivity for terminal epoxides, but it suffers from
1
0e
solvolysis and requires 5 atm H
2
.
Recently, Yu and co-
workers reported that the polyurea-microencapsulated pal-
ladium catalyst (PdEnCat) is a recyclable catalyst in epoxide
Scheme 1. Preparation of Catalyst
hydrogenolysis, which needs 40 atm H
oxides. Herein, we report a highly efficient and selective
2
for aliphatic ep-
1
1
epoxide hydrogenolysis under 1 atm H
2
at room temperature
by using 1.
The catalyst 1 was characterized by transmission electron
microscopy (TEM). In the TEM images, iron oxide nano-
particles of 60∼90 nm in diameter and palladium nanopar-
ticles of 2∼3 nm entrapped in fibrous aluminum oxyhy-
Table 1. Catalytic Activity Comparisona
6
droxide are observed (Figure 1). The specific surface area
product yield (%)b
time conversion
(h)
entry
catalyst
(%)b
2
3
1
2
3
4
1
4
>99
0
0
99.8
0
0
83
0.2
0
0
c
iron oxide
AlO(OH)
5% Pd/C
20
20
4
d
e
89
6
(
4
(
4
(
4
(
20)
(>99)
70.9
(>99)
65.1
(91.3)
14.9
(70)
0
(91)
70
(9)
0.9
(1.7)
0.6
(2.2)
0.4
(1.3)
0
5
6
7
5% Pd/Al2O3e
5% Pd/CaCO3e
5% Pd/BaCO3e
20)
(98.3)
64.5
(89.1)
14.5
(68.7)
0
Figure 1. TEM images of 1: (a) iron oxide nanoparticles (60∼90
nm) and Pd nanoparticles (2∼3 nm) entrapped in AlO(OH); (b)
iron oxide nanoparticle, (c) Pd nanoparticles.
20)
20)
8
4.3% PdEnCate 20
2
-1
of 1 was determined to be 579 m g by the N
2
BET method
a
The reaction was performed on 1.0 mmol of epichlorohydrin dissolved
at 77 K. The magnetic property of 1 was studied by using a
superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID). No
hysteresis was observed at room temperature in the magne-
tization curve, which is a typical superparamagnetic behav-
in 2.0 mL of EtOAc with 2.0 mol % Pd at 23 °C under hydrogen balloon.
b
Determined by GC. c Reaction run using 20 mg. d Reaction run using 50
mg. e Commercial catalysts.
7
ior. The saturation magnetization value at room temperature
The catalytic activity of 1 was compared with the activities
of various palladium catalysts in the hydrogenolysis of
-
1
is 4.7 emu g , which is sufficient for magnetic separation.
(
4) (a) Kim, N.; Kwon, M. S.; Park, C. M.; Park, J. Tetrahedron Lett.
(8) Larock, R. C. In ComprehensiVe Organic Transformations, 2nd ed.;
Wiley-VCH: New York, 1999; pp 1019-1027.
2
004, 45, 7057. (b) Kwon, M. S.; Kim, N.; Park, C. M.; Lee, J. S.; Kang,
K. Y.; Park, J. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1077. (c) Kwon, M. S.; Kim, N.; Seo, S.
H.; Park, I. S.; Cheedrala, R. K.; Park, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
(9) Flaherty, T. M.; Gervay, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 961.
(10) (a) Cavallo, A. S.; Lupattelli, P.; Bonini, C.; Ostuni, V.; Blasio, N.
D. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 9891. (b) Kirm, I.; Medina, F.; Rodr ´ı guez, X.;
Cesteros, Y.; Salagre, P.; Sueiras, J. E. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2005,
239, 1381. (c) Bergad, O.; Salagre, P.; Cesteros, Y.; Medina, F.; Sueiras,
J. E. Appl. Catal., A 2004, 272, 125. (d) Rode, C. V.; Telkar, M. M.;
Jaganathan, R.; Chaudhari, R. V. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2003, 200, 279.
(d) Ito, M.; Hirakawa, M.; Osaku, A.; Ikariya, T. Organometallics 2003,
22, 4190. (e) Sajiki, H.; Hattori, K.; Hitota, K. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1041.
(f) Dragovich, P. S.; Prins, T. J.; Zhou, R. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 4922.
(11) Ley, S. V.; Mitchell, C.; Pears, D.; Ramarao, C.; Yu, J.-Q.; Zhou,
W. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4665.
6
913. (d) Kim, M.-J.; Kim, W.-H.; Han, K.; Choi, Y. K.; Park, J. Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 1157.
5) Deng, H.; Li, X.; Peng, Q.; Wang, X.; Chen, J.; Li, Y. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2782.
6) (a) Kim, H. J.; Lee, H. C.; Lee, J. S. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111,
579. (b) Kuiry, S. C.; Megen, E.; Patil, S. D.; Deshpande, S. A.; Seal, S.
(
(
1
J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 3868. (c) Hicks, R. W.; Pinnavaia, T. J. Chem.
Mater. 2003, 15, 78. (d) Lee, H. C.; Kim, J. J.; Chung, S. H.; Lee, K. H.;
Lee, H. C.; Lee, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2882.
(7) See Supporting Information for the characterization of 1.
3418
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 17, 2007