Please do not adjust margins
Green Chemistry
Page 4 of 6
DOI: 10.1039/C7GC01603D
COMMUNICATION
Journal Name
General procedure for the one-pot reductive amination: A 8 mL
glass vial containing a stirring bar was sequentially charged with the
substrates functionalized with nitriles, esters or olefines. To our
delight, these moieties were well tolerated, thus furnishing the
expected amines in 82-85% isolated yields (Table 2, entries 7 and 8;
Table 3, entry 8). In addition, a nitro-substituted heteroarene was
tested and the corresponding N-heterocyclic amine was isolated in
81% yield (Table 2, entry 9).
molybdenum
catalyst
(4.4
mg,
0.005
mmol
of
[Mo3S4Cl3(dmen)3](BF4)), nitrobenzene (10 µL, 0.097 mmol),
benzaldehyde (12 µL, 0.12 mmol), n-hexadecane (15 µL; added as
an internal standard) and 2 mL of THF. Afterwards, the reaction vial
was capped with a septum equipped with a needle and set in the
alloy plate, which was then placed into a 300 mL autoclave. Once
sealed, the autoclave was purged three times with 30 bar of
hydrogen, then pressurized to 20 bar and placed into an aluminum
block, which was preheated at 70 °C. After 18 h, the autoclave was
cooled to room temperature and the hydrogen was released. Ethyl
acetate (2 mL) was then added, and a sample was taken to be
analyzed by GC. To determine the isolated yields of the anilines, the
general procedure was scaled up by the factor of 2.5, and no
internal standard was added. After completion of the reaction, the
mixture was purified by silica column chromatography (n-
heptane/ethyl acetate mixtures) to give the corresponding anilines.
In the case of the nitroalkane, 2,4,6-trimehtylphenol was added as
internal standard and the yield was calculated based on 1H NMR.
Nowadays, the reductive amination of aldehydes with aliphatic
nitrocompounds remains as an important challenge. Interestingly,
in the presence of our Mo3S4-based catalyst reaction between 2b
and 1-nitrohexane leads to the formation of the secondary amine in
61% yield (Table 2, entry 10). Moreover, our catalytic system also
works with cyclic aliphatic aldehydes. Reductive amination of
cyclohexanecarboxaldehyde with 1b affords a moderate yield (60%)
of the desired amine (Table 3, entry 9).
Finally, the preparative value of this protocol was further
demonstrated upscaling the model reaction of nitrobenzene (1a)
with benzaldehyde (2a) by a factor of 40 and using a considerable
higher concentration of reactants. As shown Scheme 1, N-
benzylaniline (3a) was obtained in 90 % yield after purification by
column chromatography.
Acknowledgements
The financial support of the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y
Competitividad (Grant CTQ2015-65207-P) and Generalitat
Valenciana (PrometeoII/2014/022) is gratefully acknowledged. The
authors also thank the Serveis Centrals d’Instrumentació Cientifica
(SCIC) of the Universitat Jaume I for providing us with mass
spectrometry and NMR techniques. E. Pedrajas thanks the
University Jaume I for a predoctoral fellowship.
Scheme 1. Up-scaled preparation of N-benzylaniline (3a)
References
Conclusions
1
2
3
4
5
6
S. D. Roughley and A. M. Jordan, J. Med. Chem., 2011, 54,
3451–3479.
In conclusion, we have developed an atom-efficient catalytic
protocol for the synthesis of secondary amines through a one-pot
reductive amination reaction from easily available nitroarenes and
aldehydes using hydrogen as reducing agent. The use of a well-
defined diamino molecular Mo3S4 cluster as catalyst allows for
successful reductive amination of aldehydes with the in situ
generated primary amines selectively affording a variety of
secondary amines in good to excellent yields. Remarkably, this
procedure applies for aromatic as well as for aliphatic nitro
compounds or aldehydes. Spectrometric and spectroscopic
techniques show no changes in cluster composition or evidences of
cluster fragmentation during the catalytic reaction. Mechanistic
investigations on the catalytic process which combine theory with
experiment are in progress.
G. Guillena, D. J. Ramón and M. Yus, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110,
1611–1641.
E. W. Baxter and A. B. Reitz, in Organic Reactions, John
Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002, pp. 1–714.
R. Kawahara, K. Fujita and R. Yamaguchi, Adv. Synth. Catal.,
2011, 353, 1161–1168.
S. Fleischer, S. Zhou, K. Junge and M. Beller, Chem. - An
Asian J., 2011, 6, 2240–2245.
E. Pedrajas, I. Sorribes, A. L. Gushchin, Y. A. Laricheva, K.
Junge, M. Beller and R. Llusar, ChemCatChem, 2017, 9,
1128–1134.
7
E. Pedrajas, I. Sorribes, K. Junge, M. Beller and R. Llusar,
ChemCatChem, 2015, 7, 2675–2681.
8
I. Sorribes, G. Wienhöfer, C. Vicent, K. Junge, R. Llusar and
M. Beller, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 7794–7798.
B. Sreedhar, P. S. Reddy and D. K. Devi, J. Org. Chem., 2009,
74, 8806–8809.
Experimental section
9
Synthesis of the catalyst: The catalyst [Mo3S4Cl3(dmen)3](BF4) was
prepared starting from the [Mo3S4(tu)8(H2O)]Cl4·4H2O thiourea
precursor according to the literature.6
10
L. Li, Z. Niu, S. Cai, Y. Zhi, H. Li, H. Rong, L. Liu, L. Liu, W. He
and Y. Li, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 6843.
4 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins