10.1002/anie.202014169
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
Keywords: Acyl transfer • Acyltransferase • Biocatalysis • Fam-
ily VIII carboxylesterase • Transesterification
to the formation of the hydrophobic cavity in family VIII.1 and VIII.2
carboxylesterases and thereby facilitates the binding and posi-
tioning of organic nucleophiles, as shown for EstCE1 and 4IVI
(Fig. 3B,E). In 3ZYT, a member of the subclass VIII.3 (H-x-x motif),
HDG is found in place of the WGG of EstCE1, causing a dramatic
decrease in active site hydrophobicity (Fig. 3D). This may explain
why 3ZYT is the only one of the investigated family VIII carboxy-
lesterases that does not exhibit any transacetylase activity.
Therefore, we had a closer look at the role of this motif in promis-
cuous acyltransferase activity. By mutation of the HDG of 3ZYT
to HGG or WGG (Fig. 3C), we rationally transformed a ‘hydrolase’
into an ‘acyltransferase’ comparable to MsAcT, the current bench-
mark for promiscuous acyltransferase activity.[5,6]
[1]
a) S. D. Copley, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2017, 47, 167-175; b) U. T.
Bornscheuer, R. J. Kazlauskas, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6032-
6040; Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 6156-6165; c) K. Hult, P. Berglund,
Trends Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 231-238.
[2]
[3]
U. Bergthorsson, D. I. Andersson, J. R. Roth, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.
S. A. 2007, 104, 17004-17009
a) S. Wu, R. Snajdrova, J. C. Moore, K. Baldenius, U. T. Bornscheuer,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, DOI: 10.1002/anie.202006648; Angew.
Chem. 2020, DOI: 10.1002/ange.202006648; b) B. Hauer, ACS Catal.
2020, 10, 8418-8427.
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
H. Land, P. Hendil-Forssell, M. Martinelle, P. Berglund, Catal. Sci. Tech-
nol. 2016, 6, 2897-2900.
I. Mathews, M. Soltis, M. Saldajeno, G. Ganshaw, R. Sala, W. Weyler,
M. A. Cervin, G. Whited, R. Bott, Biochemistry 2007, 46, 8969-8979.
S. P. Godehard, C. P. S. Badenhorst, H. Müller, U. T. Bornscheuer,
ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 7552-7562.
E. Jost, M. Kazemi, V. Mrkonjić, F. Himo, C. K. Winkler, W. Kroutil, ACS
Catal. 2020, 10, 10500-10507.
H. Müller, A.-K. Becker, G. J. Palm, L. Berndt, C. P. S. Badenhorst, S.
P. Godehard, L. Reisky, M. Lammers, U. T. Bornscheuer, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 11607-11612; Angew. Chem. 2020, 132,
11704-11709.
To further improve our understanding of this motif on both hy-
drolase and acyltransferase activities, we constructed several
EstCE1 variants which were investigated using the pNPA-AcT as-
say (Fig. 3F). Strikingly, the W339F variant shows significantly re-
duced hydrolase activity while the acyltransferase activity remains
comparable to that of wild-type EstCE1. The AT:H ratio exceeds
200, clearly putting this variant above EstM2. However, the high-
est transfer efficiency was measured for the W339Y variant,
reaching a remarkable AT:H ratio of 330. This variant is a roughly
50-fold more efficient acyltransferase than MsAcT and acyl donor
hydrolysis can almost be considered to be a negligible side reac-
tion. Analogous to the HDG motif of 3ZYT, we introduced an as-
partate residue into the second position of the motif in EstCE1
(giving WDG). As expected, this led to a drastically decreased
AT:H ratio. These data underline the significance of this motif for
promiscuous acyltransferase activity and acyl acceptor specificity
in family VIII carboxylesterases.
The purpose of the current study was to identify novel biocat-
alysts for overcoming the synthetic limitations of available acyl-
transferases and to improve our understanding of promiscuous
acyltransferase activity. We demonstrated that many family VIII
carboxylesterases exceed the limits of what was previously
thought possible by showing unprecedentedly high efficiency in
the formation of esters, carbonates, carbamates, and amides like
the antidepressant drug moclobemide. The identified three amino
acid motif adjacent to the catalytic triad could be considered as
an activity and specificity switch in this enzyme family. Most re-
markably, it took only one rationally introduced mutation to trans-
form 3ZYT, an esterase without promiscuous acetyltransferase
activity, into an acetyltransferase. To the best of our knowledge,
such a feat is unprecedented in the literature.
[9]
L. Reisky, V. S. T. Srinivasamurthy, C. P. S. Badenhorst, S. P. Gode-
hard, U. T. Bornscheuer, Catalysts 2019, 9, 64.
[10] L. Mestrom, J. G. R. Claessen, U. Hanefeld, ChemCatChem 2019, 11,
2004-2010.
[11] C. Elend, C. Schmeisser, C. Leggewie, P. Babiak, J. D. Carballeira, H.
L. Steele, J.-L. Reymond, K.-E. Jaeger, W. R. Streit, Appl. Environ.
Microbiol. 2006, 72, 3637-3645.
[12] M. Litwinowicz, J. Kijeński, Sustainable Chem. Processes 2015, 3.
[13] M. Baumann, B. H. Hauer, U. T. Bornscheuer, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2000, 11, 4781-4790.
[14] a) J. Selvin, J. Kennedy, D. P. H. Lejon, G. S. Kiran, A. D. W. Dobson,
Microb. Cell Fact. 2012, 11, 72; b) L.-M. Ouyang, J.-Y. Liu, M. Qiao, J.-
H. Xu, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013, 169, 15-28; c) H. W. Lee, W. K.
Jung, Y. H. Kim, B. H. Ryu, T. D. Kim, J. Kim, H. Kim, J. Microbiol. Bio-
technol. 2016, 26, 315-325; d) K. Rashamuse, V. Magomani, T.
Ronneburg, D. Brady, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 83, 491-500.
[15] J. Sarkar, A. Dutta, P. Pal Chowdhury, J. Chakraborty, T. K. Dutta, Mi-
crob. Cell Fact. 2020, 19, 77.
[16] a) M. Schütte, S. Fetzner, Curr. Microbiol. 2007, 54, 230-236; b) U. G.
Wagner, F. DiMaio, S. Kolkenbrock, S. Fetzner, FEBS Lett. 2014, 588,
1154-1160.
[17] J. H. Jeon, S.-J. Kim, H. S. Lee, S.-S. Cha, J. H. Lee, S.-H. Yoon, B.-S.
Koo, C.-M. Lee, S. H. Choi, S. H. Lee et al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
2011, 77, 7830-7836.
[18] S.-S. Cha, Y. J. An, C.-S. Jeong, M.-K. Kim, J. H. Jeon, C.-M. Lee, H. S.
Lee, S. G. Kang, J.-H. Lee, Proteins 2013, 81, 2045-2051.
[19] a) S.-S. Cha, Y. J. An, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 478,
818-824; b) J. H. Jeon, H. S. Lee, J. H. Lee, B.-S. Koo, C.-M. Lee, S. H.
Lee, S. G. Kang, J.-H. Lee, SpringerPlus 2016, 5, 525.
[20] a) M. Golczak, A. E. Sears, P. D. Kiser, K. Palczewski, Nat. Chem. Biol.
2015, 11, 26-32; b) M. Kazemi, X. Sheng, W. Kroutil, F. Himo, ACS
Catal. 2018, 8, 10698-10706.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
(DFG, German Research Foundation) 231396381/GRK1947 and
the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Grant No.
031B0354B). We thank the B.R.A.I.N. AG (Zwingenberg, Ger-
many) for providing the expression plasmid for EstCE1. We also
thank Prof. Wolfgang Streit (Univ. Hamburg) and Dr. Klaus
Liebeton (B.R.A.I.N. AG) for useful discussions. We thank Schrö-
dinger Maestro for providing a trial license of their software. We
acknowledge access to beamline BL14.2 of the BESSY II storage
ring (Berlin, Germany) via the Joint Berlin MX-Laboratory spon-
sored by the Helmholtz Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Ener-
gie, the Freie Universität Berlin, the Humboldt-Universität zu Ber-
lin, the Max-Delbrück Centrum, and the Leibniz-Institut für Mole-
kulare Pharmakologie.
[21] a) T. D. Ngo, C. Oh, P. Mizar, M. Baek, K.-s. Park, L. Nguyen, H.
Byeon, S. Yoon, Y. Ryu, B. H. Ryu et al., ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 755-767;
b) S. Yoon, S. Kim, Y. Ryu, T. D. Kim, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2007, 41,
1-7.
[22] U. G. Wagner, E. I. Petersen, H. Schwab, C. Kratky, Protein Sci. 2002,
11, 467-478.
4
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.