Table 3 Hydrodeoxygenation of 4-propylcyclohexanol (3) in watera
4 (a) E. Furimsky, Appl. Catal., A, 2000, 199, 147; (b) M. J. Girgis
and B. C. Gates, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1991, 30, 2021.
5 (a) E. Furimsky and F. E. Massoth, Catal. Today, 1999, 52, 381;
(b) A. Centeno, E. Laurent and B. Delmon, J. Catal., 1995,
154, 288; (c) E. Laurent and B. Delmon, J. Catal., 1994,
146, 281; (d) E. Laurent and B. Delmon, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,
1993, 32, 2516; (e) A. Vuori, A. Helenius and J. B.-S. Bredenberg,
Appl. Catal., 1989, 52, 41.
6 (a) W. Wang, Y. Yang, H. Luo, T. Hu and W. Liu, React. Kinet.,
Mech. Catal., 2011, 102, 207; (b) N. Yan, Y. Yuan, R. Dykeman,
Y. Kou and P. J. Dyson, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 5549;
(c) S. Echeandia, P. L. Arias, V. L. Barrio, B. Pawelec and J. L.
G. Fierro, Appl. Catal., B, 2010, 101, 1; (d) D.-Y. Hong,
S. J. Miller, P. K. Agrawal and C. W. Jones, Chem. Commun.,
2010, 46, 1038; (e) V. A. Yakovlev, S. A. Khromova,
O. V. Sherstyuk, V. O. Dundich, D. Y. Ermakov, V. M.
Novopashina, M. Y. Lebedev, O. Bulavchenko and V. N. Parmon,
Catal. Today, 2009, 144, 362; (f) A. Gutierrez, R. K. Kaila,
M. L. Honkela, R. Slioor and A. O. I. Krause, Catal. Today, 2009,
147, 239; (g) S. Ramanathan and S. T. Oyama, J. Phys. Chem., 1995,
99, 16365.
Yield (%)
11
2
Entry
Catalyst
Conversion (%)
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
No catalyst
No catalystb
Pt/AC(N)
Pt/CMK-3
Pt/MWCNT
Pt/AC(W)
Pt/BP2000
Pt/AC(N)b
15
2
100
99
97
64
100
66
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
95
82
87
55
84
58
7 (a) C. Zhao, Y. Kou, A. A. Lemonidou, X. Li and J. A. Lercher,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 3987; (b) C. Zhao, J. He, A. A.
Lemonidou, X. Li and J. A. Lercher, J. Catal., 2011, 280, 8.
8 C. Zhao, Y. Kou, A. A. Lemonidou, X. Li and J. A. Lercher,
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 412.
a
Reaction conditions: 4-propylcyclohexanol (2.0 mmol), Pt catalyst
(2 wt% Pt, 98 mg, S/C = 200), water (40 ml), initial H2 pressure at RT =
b
4 MPa, 280 1C, 1 h, stirred at 600 rpm. CaCO3 (4.0 mmol), pH = 10.
9 S. Jun, S. H. Joo, R. Ryoo, M. Kruk, M. Jaroniec, Z. Liu,
T. Ohsuna and O. Terasaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122,
10712.
10 In the case of Rh/AC(N) (Table 1, entry 10), propylcyclopentane
(o1%) was formed, but no other products were observed on
GC of the liquid and gas phases. In the reaction of Ru/AC(N)
(entry 11), propylcyclopentane (11%), 2-methylpropylcyclopentane
(8%), and some unidentified products were detected in the liquid
phase, where the total carbon yield in the liquid phase was 86%.
Methane (3%) was observed in the gas phase.
11 In this reaction, 1 (1%), 3 (o1%), 5 (o1%), 2-methoxy-4-
propylcyclohexanol (o1%), 2-methylpropylcyclo-pentane (1%),
methane (3%), and minor unidentified products were observed.
12 (a) T. Nimmanwudipong, R. C. Runnebaum, D. E. Block and
B. C. Gates, Catal. Lett., 2011, 141, 779; (b) X. Zhu, L. L. Lobban,
R. G. Mallinson and D. E. Resasco, J. Catal., 2011, 281, 21.
13 When the reaction of 3 was performed with Pt/AC(N) under 1 atm
of He atmosphere, the dehydrogenation of 3 gave a mixture of
4-propylphenol 1 (15%) and 4-propylcyclohexanone 4 (10%)
together with propylcyclohexane 2 (2%), 3 (57%), and propyl-
benzene 5 (1%). Thus, the reaction of 3 was carried out under
pressurized H2 to evaluate the hydrogenolysis ability of the Pt/
carbon catalysts.
14 (a) N. Akiya and P. E. Savage, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102, 2725;
(b) P. E. Savage, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 603; (c) W. L. Marshall and
E. U. Franck, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1981, 10, 295.
15 (a) N. Akiya and P. E. Savage, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2001,
40, 1822; (b) B. Kuhlmann, E. M. Arnett and M. Siskin, J. Org.
Chem., 1994, 59, 3098.
the conversion of 3 to 2, and among the tested catalysts,
Pt/AC(N) afforded the highest yield of 2 (entry 23, 95%). Even
in the presence of a base, the reaction by Pt/AC(N) gave 2 in
good yield (entry 28). The promotional effect is probably due to
the enhancement of C–O bond hydrogenolysis by Pt/carbon.17
In summary, we have developed a highly efficient carbon-
supported Pt catalyst for the hydrodeoxygenation of phenols
under acid-free conditions. The Pt/AC(N) catalyst is prepared
from the readily available AC(N) support and is reusable
without loss of catalytic activity. The detailed mechanism
and the practical application to lignin are now under study.
This work was financially supported by JSPS KAKENHI
(20226016).
Notes and references
1 (a) M. Stocker, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 9200;
¨
(b) D. C. Elliott, Energy Fuels, 2007, 21, 1792; (c) G. W. Huber,
S. Iborra and A. Corma, Chem. Rev., 2006, 106, 4044; (d) D. Mohan,
C. U. Pittman, Jr. and P. H. Steele, Energy Fuels, 2006, 20, 848;
(e) S. Czernik and A. V. Bridgwater, Energy Fuels, 2004, 18, 590;
(f) A. V. Bridgwater and G. V. C. Peacocke, Renewable Sustainable
Energy Rev., 2000, 4, 1; (g) D. S. Scott, P. Majerski, J. Piskorz and
D. Radlein, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 1999, 51, 23.
2 J. Zakzeski, P. C. A. Bruijnincx, A. L. Jongerius and B. M. Weckhuysen,
Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 3552, and references cited therein.
16 (a) M. J. Antal, Jr., M. Carlsson and X. Xu, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,
1998, 37, 3820; (b) X. Xu and M. J. Antal, Jr., Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res., 1997, 36, 23; (c) X. Xu and M. J. Antal, Jr., AIChE J., 1994,
40, 1524.
17 NH3-TPD profiles of Pt/AC(N) and AC(N) showed no peak,
suggesting that Pt/AC(N) and AC(N) had no acidity (Fig. S7 in
ESIw). Therefore, acid-catalysis of Pt/AC(N) in the reaction of 3
can be excluded.
3 (a) D. J. Nowakowski, A. V. Bridgwater, D. C. Elliott, D. Meier
and P. de Wild, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 2010, 88, 53; (b) C. Amen-
Chen, H. Pakdel and C. Roy, Bioresour. Technol., 2001, 79, 277;
(c) P. F. Britt, A. C. Buchanan, III, M. J. Cooney and D. R.
Martineau, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 1376; (d) D. Meier, R. Ante
and O. Faix, Bioresour. Technol., 1992, 40, 171; (e) P. Zuman and
E. B. Rupp, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun., 2001, 66, 1125.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 12209–12211 12211