V. Marinko6ic et al. / Il Farmaco 55 (2000) 128–133
131
In order to determine a lower content of the nitroso
analogue in the presence of nisoldipine, transformation
to the second-order derivative spectra was accom-
plished. In the second-order derivative spectrum of the
2
nitroso analogue, the amplitude D291 is entirely inde-
pendent of any nisoldipine present, confirming that this
derivative order is sufficient to deconvolute the overlap-
ping spectra of these compounds (Fig. 3). In the wave-
length range 275–320 nm the second-order derivative
spectrum of nisoldipine, at a higher concentration (20
mg/ml) than the one used for the first-derivative assay,
is actually zero. This was established by analyzing the
Fig. 3. Second-order derivative UV spectra of: nisoldipine (20 mg/ml;
curve 2); nitroso analogue (20 mg/ml; curve 1) and their binary
mixture of the same concentrations (curve 3).
2
1
amplitude D291 of the binary mixture with the corre-
dipine using the amplitude D386, in comparison with
2
sponding amplitude D291 of the standard nitroso ana-
the literature data [12] concerning first-order derivative
UV spectrophotometry for nifedipine determination us-
ing 214 nm as detection wavelength, offers a more
suitable wavelength for determination, as well as a
lower concentration range compared with the obtained
range for nifedipine of 5–45 mg/ml.
The least-squares regression equations for the first-
order derivative spectra obtained for nisoldipine and its
nitroso derivative in the concentration ranges 1–10 and
0.2–5 mg/ml, respectively, with the corresponding val-
ues for correlation coefficients are:
logue solution, since the same value is obtained (Fig. 3,
2
curves 3 and 1, respectively). The amplitude D291 cor-
responds to the peak of the long-wavelength satellite
with respect to the derivative baseline zero. Since satel-
lites in second- and also in fourth-derivative spectra are
rather smaller than the actual derivative peak itself,
some sensitivity may be lost, but the greater displace-
ment of a satellite away from the centroid peak may
fortuitously place it in a spectral zone clear of overlap-
ping interferences.
The amplitude of the centroid peak at 274 nm could
not be used, since as can be seen from Fig. 3 (curves 1
and 3), this amplitude is in a spectral zone of nisoldip-
ine overlapping interference.
for nisoldipine y=0.021× −0.0013; r=0.9993
for nitroso analogue y=0.1399× +0.0009; r=0.9999
Using a nitroso analogue concentration of 0.2 mg/ml,
the experimentally obtained value for the limit of detec-
tion was 0.05 mg/ml, defined as the concentration giving
an amplitude signal that is three times higher than the
noise signal, while a quantification limit of 0.15 mg/ml
was considered as the concentration that is three times
the limit of detection.
The least-squares regression equation for nitroso
analogue determination, in the second-order derivative
assay at 291 nm, in the concentration range 0.4–20
mg/ml, with the corresponding value for the correlation
coefficient is y=0.016× +0.0004; r=0.9998. The re-
2
peatability of the proposed method using D291 was
evaluated at a nitroso analogue concentration of 20
mg/ml, and the obtained RSD was 0.65% (n=6).
Using a nitroso analogue concentration of 0.4 mg/ml,
the experimentally obtained value for the limit of detec-
tion was 0.1 mg/ml, defined as the concentration giving
an amplitude signal that is three times higher than the
noise signal, while a quantification limit of 0.3 mg/ml
was considered as the concentration that is three times
the limit of detection.
The repeatability of the proposed method was evalu-
ated for concentrations of 10 and 5 mg/ml of nisoldipine
and nitroso analogue, respectively, and the obtained
values of relative standard deviations (RSD) were 0.44
and 0.62% (n=6).
The effect of high concentrations of nisoldipine on
the determination of the nitroso analogue was evalu-
ated by determining the percentage recovery of the
nitroso analogue in binary mixtures. The solution con-
taining a constant nisoldipine concentration of 5 mg/ml,
with no detectable amount of its nitroso analogue, was
spiked with an aliquot at two concentrations of 0.25
and 0.5 mg/ml of the nitroso analogue. The percentage
Stock solutions containing a fixed nisoldipine con-
centration of 0.1 mg/ml, with no detectable amount of
its nitroso analogue, were diluted to a working concen-
tration of 20 mg/ml and were spiked with an aliquot of
a nitroso analogue solution at two concentrations of 0.4
and 1 mg/ml (equivalent to impurity levels of 2 and 5%,
respectively). The percentage recoveries for the nitroso
1
recoveries achieved using the amplitude D285 were 98.7
and 100.1% (n=5). Considering the recovery values,
the minimal detectable amount of nitroso analogue in
the presence of nisoldipine at a concentration of 5
mg/ml was 0.25 mg/ml (equivalent to an impurity level
of 5%). Using the first-order derivative spectrum, the
determination of the nitroso analogue was not feasible
at an impurity level lower than 5%.
2
analogue using the amplitude D291 were 100.98 and
99.79%, respectively (n=5). Considering the obtained
recovery values, the minimal detectable amount of ni-
troso analogue in the presence of nisoldipine was 0.4
mg/ml (equivalent to an impurity level of 2%).