R. SALAZAR ET AL.
Table 3. Retention times (Rt) of oxidized products obtained by controlled-potential electrolysis (CPE) and the reaction of
1,4-dihydropyridines with superoxide anion obtained from HPLC with diode array detector (l ¼ 250 nm)
a
b
c
Derivative
Rt 1,4-DHP /min
Rt reaction solution /min
Rt electrolyzed derivative /min
4-(3-indolyl)-DHP
4-(5-indolyl)-DHP
4-phenyl-DHP
5.9
5.5
8.5
6.2
5.9
9.6
6.2 (
Eapp ¼ 1100 mV)
5.9 (Eapp ¼ 1100 mV)
9.5 (Eapp ¼ 1200 Mv)
a
b
c
Average of three independent measurements of parent 1,4-DHP.
Products of the reaction with superoxide radical anion of the derivatives after 5 h at 37 8C.
Controlled-potential electrolysis (CPE) in DMSO þ 0.1 M de TBAHFP.
ꢀ
the chromatographic signals and retention times support that
products are quite similar, corresponding to the pyridine
derivative.
DHP-anion was not possible its identification by HPLC
technique because the pH of the mobile phase was pH 4.3.
Kinetic experiments were carried out in DMSO (UV–Vis), and
aliquots of such reaction solutions were injected into the
chromatograph. In consequence, the DHP-anion returns to its
protonated-DHP form due to the acidity of the mobile phase,
precluding its determination.
4. The anionic form of DHP does not react with O2 to generate
pyridine.
5. Analyses of reaction solutions by GC–MS permit us the identi-
fication of the pyridine derivative as the final product.
6. Results from voltammetric techniques (CV and DPV) were
consistent with the spectroscopic ones, supporting the for-
ꢂ
mation of the DHP anion (R—N ) and the consumption of the
parent 1,4-DHPs in the reaction.
Acknowledgements
GC/MS
This work was partially supported by Grant 1050761 (L.J. N u´ n˜ ez-
Vergara) from FONDECYT and a Grant AT-23070093 (R. Salazar)
from CONICYT.
To identify the final products after the reaction between
superoxide and the 1,4-DHP derivatives, a GC–MS method was
used. Figure 8 shows typical extracted ion chromatograms and
mass spectra corresponding to a solution resulting after 5 h
reaction between an initial 0.1 mM 4-(3-indolyl)-DHP) solution
and 20 mM superoxide in DMSO at 37 8C. The chromatogram
shows a peak at 10.4 min corresponding to the pyridine
derivative. The other 1,4-DHP derivatives exhibited similar
characteristics, varying only the product’s abundance. In all the
compounds, the retention times of the oxidized derivatives were
lower than those of the parent derivatives, and the mass spectral
fragmentation pattern were different from that of the original
REFERENCES
[
[
1] E. W. Kellog, I. J. Fridovich, Biol. Chem. 1977, 252, 6721–6728.
2] S. Cuzzocrea, D. P. Riley, A. P. Caputi, D. Salvemini, Pharmacol. Rev.
2001, 53, 135–159.
[3] Y. Moroka, C. S. Foote, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 98, 1510–1516.
[
[
[
[
4] D. M. Stout, A. I. Meyers, Chem. Rev. 1982, 82, 223–243.
5] R. Lavilla, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 1141–1156.
6] D. J. Triggle, Drug Dev. Res. 2003, 58, 5–17.
[
28]
derivatives.
We can conclude that the only product of the
7] D. J. Triggle, Biochem. Pharmacol. 2007, 74(1), 1–9.
reaction was the pyridine derivative. Analyses of electrolyzed
solutions of 1,4-DHPs at 1100 mV by this technique revealed
the similarity of the chromatographic characteristics of these
products with those obtained by the reaction with the free
radical. Average retention time of the oxidized derivatives was
[8] L. J. N u´ n˜ ez-Vergara, C. Lopez-Alarc o´ n, P. A. Navarrete-Encina, A. M.
Atria, C. Camargo, J. A. Squella, Free Rad. Res. 2003, 37(1), 109–120.
[
9] C. L o´ pez-Alarc o´ n, H. Speisky, J. A. Squella, C. Olea-Azar, C. Camargo,
L. J. N u´ n˜ ez-Vergara, Pharm. Res. 2004, 21, 1750–1757.
[
10] L. J. N u´ n˜ ez-Vergara, R. Salazar, C. Camargo, J. Carbajo, B. Conde, P. A.
Navarrete-Encina, J. A. Squella, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 4318–
4326.
10.4 min and m/z of 366 was the most abundant fragment,
[
[
[
[
[
11] P. A. Navarrete-Encina, J. A. Squella, J. Carbajo, B. Conde, L. J.
N u´ n˜ ez-Vergara, Synth. Commun. 2007, 37, 2051–2060.
12] P. Rani, V. K. Srivastava, A. Kumar, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 39, 449–
supporting that both types of products are the same,
corresponding to the pyridine derivative.
452.
13] F. Palluotto, F. Campagna, A. Carotti, M. Ferappi, A. Rosato, C. Vitali,
Farmaco 2002, 57, 63–69.
14] M. Mugnaini, M. Antolini, M. Corsi, F. T. Vanamsterdam, J. Recept.
Signal Transduct Res. 1998, 18, 91–112.
15] M. Mor, C. Silva, F. Vacondio, P. V. Plazzi, S. Bertoni, G. Spadoni, G.
Diamantini, A. Bedini, G. Tarzia, M. Zusso, D. Franceschini, P. Giusti,
J. Pineal Res. 2004, 36, 95–102.
CONCLUSIONS
1
2
3
. C4-indolyl substituted 1,4-DHPs significantly reacted with
superoxide either electrochemically generated or as the pot-
assium salt.
. Apparent first-order kinetic rate constant values of synthesized
compounds were higher than that of commercial 1,4-DHPs,
nifedipine, nisoldipine, and amlodipine.
. Extended NMR spectra demonstrated an acid–base equi-
librium reaction involving the protons at 1-position of both
heterocycles.
[16] R. Lavilla, T. Gotsens, M. C. Santano, J. Bosch, A. Camins, N. Arnau, E.
Escubedo, J. Camarasa, M. Pallas, Bioorg. Chem. 1997, 25, 169–
1
78.
17] R. P. Mason, I. T. Mak, M. W. Trumbore, P. E. Mason, J. Cardiol. 1999, 84, 161–
21.
[
[
2
18] G. D ´ı az-Araya, L. Godoy, L. Naranjo, J. A. Squella, M. E. Letelier, L. J.
Nu n˜ ez-Vergara, Gen. Pharmacol. 1998, 31, 385–391.
www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/poc
Copyright ß 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2009, 22 569–577