Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Article
solution of 16b [54.4 g, 46.9 wt %, 25.5 g of product, 94% yield against
a standard prepared by bulb to bulb distillation (0.2 Torr, 150 °C oven
temperature), ratio 99:1 trans- to cis-]. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ
7.31−7.10 (m, 5H), 4.13 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.46 (tt, J = 12.3, 3.3 Hz,
1H), 2.23 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 1.98−1.80 (m, 5H), 1.58−1.42 (m,
2H), 1.26 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 4H), 1.23−1.07 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (101
MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.43, 146.85, 127.96, 126.45, 125.58, 60.20, 44.22,
42.22, 34.77, 34.09, 33.40, 14.61. MS (DCI − NH3) (M + 18) 262.2
m/e. FTIR 2923, 1694, 1293, 695 cm−1.
projected human pharmacokinetics will be disclosed in due
course.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
■
General. Proton NMR spectra were obtained on a Varian Mercury
plus 300 or Varian UNITY plus 300 MHz instrument with chemical
shifts (δ) reported relative to tetramethylsilane as an internal standard.
Target compounds possess a purity of at least 95% based on
combustion analysis (< 0.4), performed by QTI (Quantitative
Technologies, Inc.). Column chromatography was carried out either
with an Analogix IntelliFlash 280 chromatography apparatus using
SuperFlash Compound Purification Columns or on silica gel 60 (230−
400 mesh). Thin-layer chromatography was performed using 250 mm
silica gel 60 glass-backed plates with F254 as indicator.
trans-Ethyl 2-4-(4-(Hydroxymethyl)phenyl)cyclohexyl)-
acetate (17). To a slurry of AlCl3 (31.2 g, 234 mmol) in
dichloromethane (250 mL) was added a solution of ester 16b in
heptanes (54.2 g, 51.1% w/w, 112 mmol) while maintaining the
temperature below 5 °C. The flask was again cooled to −5 °C, and
oxalyl chloride (17.8 g, 140 mmol) was added while the temperature
was maintained below 10 °C. The solution was stirred for 45 min at
which time the reaction was complete by HPLC. The reaction mixture
was poured slowly into an aqueous solution of CaCl2 (13 g of CaCl2 in
170 mL of water) precooled to −5 °C. The internal temperature of the
quench was maintained at or below 10 °C, and the quench solution
was stirred at room temperature for 30 min. The organic layer was
separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with DCM (50 mL).
The combined organic layers were washed with CaCl2 (13 g CaCl2 in
170 mL of water). The organic layer was then dried over MgSO4 and
filtered sequentially through Celite and a carbon-impregnated filter.
The solution was concentrated under reduced pressure to 75 g and
chased with approximately 250 g of THF to give the product as a
Ethyl 2-(4-Phenylcyclohexylidene)acetate (15). To a solution
of NaOtBu (17.0 g, 176.9 mmol, 1.1 equiv) in THF (100 mL) was
added triethyl phosphonoacetate (39.6 g, 176.6 mmol, 1.1 equiv)
dropwise over 1 h at 0 °C, and the resulting mixture was stirred at 0 °C
for 1 h. A THF (100 mL) solution of 4-phenylcyclohexanone (28.0 g,
160.7 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was then added dropwise over 1 h, and the
reaction mixture was warmed to 25 °C and stirred for 90 min. Upon
completion of the reaction as indicated by HPLC, heptane (100 mL)
and water (100 mL) were added, the contents were mixed for 10 min,
and the layers were separated. The organic layer was washed with
aqueous NaHCO3 (6.5 wt %, 100 mL) and water (100 mL) and
concentrated to a volume of ∼80 mL by rotary evaporation. EtOH
(100 mL) was added to the residue, and the resultant solution was
reconcentrated to a volume of ∼80 mL by rotary evaporation. This
process was repeated to afford an ethanolic solution of ethyl 2-(4-
phenylcyclohexylidene)acetate (74.6 g, 52.0 wt %, 38.8 g product, 98%
yield against a standard prepared by bulb to bulb distillation (0.2 Torr,
150 °C oven temperature). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.33−7.10
(m, 5H), 5.67 (s, 1H), 4.15 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 4.03−3.92 (m, 1H),
2.77 (tt, J = 12.2, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 2.43−2.27 (m, 2H), 2.10−1.96 (m,
3H), 1.72−1.54 (m, 2H), 1.28 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101
MHz, CDCl3): δ 166.13, 161.22, 145.52, 128.06, 126.41, 125.84,
113.47, 59.60, 44.17, 37.83, 35.72, 34.94, 29.63, 14.61. MS (DCI −
NH3) (M + 18) 262.2 m/e FTIR 2930, 1709, 1647, 1141, 698 cm−1.
Anal. calcd for C16H22O2: C, 78.65%; H, 8.25%. Found: C, 78.72%; H,
8.46%.
1
33.7% w/w solution in THF (26.0 g, 79%). H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3): δ 8.05 (d, J = 8.5, 2H), 7.32 (d, J = 8.5, 2H), 4.41 (dd, J =
14.2, 7.11, 2H), 2.61−2.54 (m, 1H), 2.25 (d, J = 6.8, 2H), 1.97−1.85
(m, 4H), 1.57−1.47 (m, 2H), 1.27 (t, J = 7, 3H), 1.24−1.11 (m, 2H).
A 250 mL stainless steel pressure canister was charged with THF (19
g, 13 volumes), acid chloride (8.77 g, 16.6% w/w, 4.7 mmol, 1 equiv),
triethylamine (2.0 g, 2.75 mL, 19.8 mmol, 2 equiv), and 5% Pd/C
(0.62 g) and was agitated for 18 h at room temp under an atmosphere
of H2 (40 psi). The reaction was monitored by HPLC. Upon
completion, the catalyst was filtered away using a 0.45 μM filter rinsing
with THF (5 g, 3.5 volumes) to give the desired alcohol as a solution
in THF (38 g, 3.67% w/w) in 50.1% assay yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 7.28 (d, J = 8.2, 2H), 7.19 (d, J = 8.2, 2H), 4.65 (s, 1H),
4.13 (dd, J = 7.1, 7.1, 2H), 2.51−2.41 (m, 1H), 2.23 (d, J = 6.7, 2H),
1.93−1.85 (m, 4H), 1.70−1.45 (m, 4H), 1.27 (t, J = 5.0, 3H), 1.22−
1.11 (m, 2H).
trans-Ethyl 2-4-(4-(Cyanomethyl)phenyl)cyclohexyl)acetate
(18). A solution of alcohol 17 in THF (483 g, 1.79% w/w, 33
mmol) was diluted with MTBE (130 g, 15 volumes) and washed
sequentially with 1% Na2CO3 aqueous solution (2 × 60 mL), 2 N
aqueous solution of HCl (2 × 130 mL), water (2 × 130 mL), and a 5%
aqueous NaCl solution (130 mL). The organic layer was dried over
MgSO4. The solution was concentrated under reduced pressure to
afford an oil that was dissolved in AcOH (26 mL), and a 33% aqueous
solution of HBr (13 mL, 3 equiv) was added with stirring. The
reaction mixture was stirred for 1.5 h, and the progress was monitored
by HPLC. Upon completion of the reaction, water (160 mL) was
added slowly to the stirring reaction mixture during which time a
brown precipitate formed. The solids were filtered, washed with water
(50 mL), 2.5% NaHCO3 (50 mL), and water (50 mL), and dried in an
oven overnight at 50 °C to give the desired product as a white solid
(8.6 g, 80.9% w/w, 88% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.3 (d,
J = 8.2, 2H), 7.16 (d, J = 8.2, 2H), 4.48 (s, 2H), 4.14 (dd, J = 14.2, 7.1,
2H), 2.52−2.40 (m, 1H), 2.23 (d, J = 6.7, 2H), 1.95−1.83 (m, 5H),
1.57−1.42 (m, 2H), 1.27 (t, J = 7.1, 3H), 1.22−1.09 (m, 2H). A
solution of the resultant bromide (10.1 g, 29.9 mmol) in acetonitrile
(90 mL) was warmed to 40 °C, and an aqueous solution of NaCN (4.9
g, 100 mmol) in water (10 mL) was added over 15 min while keeping
the internal temperature below 50 °C. The reaction mixture was
stirred at 40 °C for 6 h. The reaction was monitored by HPLC. Upon
completion, the mixture was cooled to room temperature and
partitioned between water (225 mL) and MTBE (100 mL). The
aqueous layer was separated and extracted with MTBE (60 mL). The
trans-Ethyl 2-4-(4-(Hydroxymethyl)phenyl)cyclohexyl)-
acetate (16b). A solution of ethyl 2-(4-phenylcyclohexylidene)-
acetate (38.8 g) in ethanol (200 mL) was hydrogenated over 5%
Pd(C) at 50 °C and 40 psi for 2.5 h, filtered, and concentrated by
rotary evaporation to a volume of approximately 120 mL to afford a
2.4/1 mixture of trans and cis isomers. An aqueous solution of LiOH
(20.0 g in 100 g water) was added, and the resulting reaction mixture
was warmed to 50
5 °C. After 1 h, the trans Li-carboxylate
crystallized from the reaction mixture as a thick slurry, and additional
water (287 g) was added to facilitate mixing, which continued at 50
5 °C for an additional 6 h. Analysis by HPLC revealed that the
hydrolysis was complete, and the reaction mixture was cooled to room
temperature. The trans Li salt was collected by filtration and washed
with aqueous 5% LiOH (2 × 50 g). The wet cake was partitioned
between EtOAc (250 g) and 6 N HCl (100 g), and the suspension was
mixed until all solids were dissolved. After separation of the layers, the
EtOAc layer was concentrated by rotary evaporation, and the residue
was treated with EtOH (100 g), which was then removed in the same
manner. The residue was dissolved in EtOH (300 mL), and H2SO4
(0.3 mL) was added. The reaction mixture was heated to reflux and
mixed overnight. After this time, HPLC analysis revealed that the re-
esterification was complete, and the solution was cooled to room
temperature. After it was concentrated to a volume of approximately
60 mL by rotary evaporation, heptane (195 g) was added, the layers
were separated, and the organic layer was washed with saturated
aqueous NaHCO3 (50 mL) and brine (50 mL). The organic layer was
reduced to a volume of approximately 60 mL by rotary evaporation.
Heptane (100 g) was added, and the resulting solution was
concentrated to ∼60 mL by rotary evaporation affording a heptane
1755
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm201524g | J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 1751−1757