J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12663-12664
12663
parameters ∆Hq, ∆Sq, and ∆Vq determined from temperature
(T) and hydrostatic pressure (P) effects on reactions with the
A Dissociative Mechanism for Reactions of Nitric
Oxide with Water Soluble Iron(III) Porphyrins
3-
water soluble complexes FeIII(TPPS)(H2O)2 (I) and FeIII-
n-
Leroy E. Laverman,† Mikio Hoshino,‡ and Peter C. Ford*,†
(TMPS)(H2O)2 (II) (TPPS ) tetra(4-sulfonatophenyl)por-
phine; TMPS ) tetra(sulfonatomesityl)porphine).12 These point
to a ligand dissociative pathway as dominating the “on”
mechanism and offer insight into the nature of such pathways
in bioregulatory signaling.
Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of California,
Santa Barbara, California 93106, and Institute of Physical
and Chemical Research, Wako, Saitama 351-01, Japan
Laser flash photolysis13 of aqueous solutions of I or II
under defined NO pressures gave transient spectra consistent
with the spectral differences between FeIII(Por)(H2O)(NO)n- and
ReceiVed July 21, 1997
Nitric oxide has significant roles in mammalian biology as
an intercellular signaling agent and in cytotoxic immune
response.1 The principal targets for NO under bioregulatory
conditions are metal centers, primarily iron.2 Although the
ferroheme enzyme soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) is the best
characterized example,3 various reports point to roles in inhibi-
tion of metalloenzymes such as cytochrome oxidase,4 nitrile
hydrase5 and catalase6 and in vasodilator properties of a salivary
ferriheme protein of blood-sucking insects.7 Concentrations
generated for bioregulation are low ([NO] < 1 µM reported in
endothelium cells for blood pressure control8 ); thus, reactions
with targets such as sGC must have very high rate constants
(kon) to compete effectively with other physical and chemical
processes leading to NO depletion.
Rates of NO reactions with various metal targets can be
determined by laser flash techniques,9,10 where NO is photo-
labilized from a M-NO precursor, and subsequent relaxation
to equilibrium is followed spectroscopically. Indeed, reactions
of NO with heme centers were thus investigated before the
bioregulatory functions were postulated.10 Despite this activity,
the mechanisms by which NO reacts with heme iron, i.e., the
“on” reaction for eq 1, (Por ) a porphyrin moiety), have not
n-
FeIII(Por)(H2O)2 (e.g., Figure 1). The transients decayed
exponentially (kobsd) to regenerate the equilibrium mixture of
solvated and nitrosyl complexes (see Figure 1 inset). No
permanent photoproducts were observed; thus the decay rep-
resents the relaxation of the FeIII(Por)/NO system according to
eq 1 and kobsd ) kon[NO] + koff. Accordingly, a plot of kobsd
versus [NO] was linear with a slope (kon) of 3.0 × 106 M-1 s-1
and a nonzero intercept (koff) of 7.3 × 102 s-1 for Por ) TMPS
at 25 °C giving a kon/koff ratio (4.1 × 103 M-1) within
experimental uncertainty of the equilibrium constant (3.93 ×
103 M-1) determined spectroscopically.
Temperature and hydrostatic pressure effects were evaluated
by determining kobsd at several [NO] and extracting the kon and
koff values at individual T or P over the respective ranges of
25-45 °C and 0.1-250 MPa. Eyring plots for kon and koff gave
sizable activation enthalpies ∆Hq and, more dramatically, Very
positiVe activation entropies ∆Sq for both the “on” and “off”
reactions for each complex. Similarly, plots of ln(kon) and ln-
‡
(koff) vs P were found to be linear,13 and the calculated ∆Von
‡
and ∆Voff values are substantially positive (Table 1).
The large and positive ∆Sq and, more emphatically, ∆Vq
values for kon and koff represent signatures for a substitution
mechanism dominated by ligand dissociation,14 i.e., eqs 2 and
3:
kon
Fe(Por) + NO y z Fe(Por)(NO)
(1)
koff
FeIII(Por)(H2O)2 yk1z FeIII(Por)(H2O) + H2O
(2)
(3)
been systematically probed. While it is often assumed that
reaction of a ligand with heme iron requires an open coordina-
tion site, the quantitative basis for such assumption, especially
for reaction with NO, is more legendary than factual. Further-
more, the possibility remains that NO, a stable free radical, may
react by pathway(s) different than other Lewis bases.11 To
address these mechanistic questions, we report the activation
k-1
FeIII(Por)(H2O) + NO yk2z FeIII(Por)(H2O)NO
k-2
Consistent with this mechanism is the report by Hunt et al.15
n-
that H2O exchange between solvent and FeIII(TPPS)(H2O)2
† University of California.
occurs at a first-order rate (kex ) 1.4 × 107 s-1 in 25 °C water)
far exceeding the kobsd values determined here for any [NO]. If
the steady-state approximation were taken with regard to
intermediate FeIII(Por)(H2O), the kobsd for the exponential
relaxation of the nonequilibrium mixture generated by the flash
photolysis experiment would be
‡ Institute of Physical and Chemical Research.
(1) (a) Moncada, S.; Palmer, R. M. J.; Higgs, E. A. Pharmacol. ReV.
1991, 43, 109-142. (b) Feldman, P. L.; Griffith, O. W.; Stuehr, D. J. Chem.
Eng. News 1993, 71, 10, 26-38.
(2) (a) Radi, R. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1996, 9, 828-835. (b) Traylor, T.
G.; Sharma, V. S. Biochemistry 1992, 31, 2847-2849.
(3) Kim, S.; Deinum, G.; Gardner, M. T.; Marletta, M. M.; Babcock, G.
T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8769-8770 and references therein.
(4) Cleeter, M. W. J.; Cooper, J. M.; Darley-Usmar, V. M.; Moncada,
S.; Scapira, A. H. V. FEBS Lett. 1994, 345, 50-54.
k1k2[NO] + k-1k-2[H2O]
(5) Noguchi, T.; Honda, J.; Nagamune, T.; Sasabe, H.; Inoue, Y.; Endo,
I. FEBS Lett. 1995, 358, 9-12.
kobsd
)
(4)
k-1[H2O] + k2[NO]
(6) Brown, G. C. Eur. J. Biochem. 1995, 232, 188-191.
(7) Ribiero, J. M. C.; Hazzard, J. M. H.; Nussenzveig, R. H.; Champagne,
D. E.; Walker, F. A. Science 1993, 260, 539-541.
Under the experimental conditions, one may conclude that
k-1[H2O] . k2[NO] since both steps involve nearly diffusion-
(8) Malinski, T.; Czuchajowski, C. In Methods in Nitric Oxide Research;
Feelish, M., Stamler, J. S., Eds.; J. Wiley and Sons: Chichester, England,
1996; Chapter 22 and references therein.
(12) (a) Barkey, M. H.; Takeuchi, K. J.; Meyer, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1986, 108, 5876-5885. (b) Cheng, S.; Chen, Y.; Su, Y. O. J. Chin. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 38, 15-22.
(9) Hoshino, M.; Ozawa, K.; Seki, H.; Ford, P. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1993, 115, 9568-9575
(10) (a) Tamura, M.; Kobayashi, K.; Hayashi, K. FEBS Lett. 1978, 88,
124-126. (b) Rose, E. J.; Hoffman, B.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 2866-
2873. (c) Cornelius, P. A.; Hochstrasser, R. M.; Steele, A. W. J. Mol. Biol.
1983, 163, 119-128. (d) Jongeward, K. A; Magde, D.; Taube, D. J.;
Marsters, J. C.; Traylor, T. G.; Sharma, V. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988,
110, 380-387.
(13) (a) Flash photolysis was performed in the pump-probe mode as
described previously.13b,c The activation volume was calculated from ∆Vq
i
) -RT(d ln(ki)/dP)T, where ki is the rate constant at a particular P.13c (b)
Crane, D. R.; Ford, P. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8510-8516. (c)
Traylor, T. G.; Luo, J.; Simon; J. A.; Ford, P. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992,
114, 4340-4345.
(11) (a) For example, reaction of NO with Ru(NH3)63+ to give Ru(NH3)5-
(14) Ducommun, Y.; Merbach, A. E. In Inorganic High Pressure
Chemistry; van Eldik, R., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1986; Chapter 2, pp
69-114.
(NO)3+ occurs via an associative mechanism at a second-order rate (kon
)
0.19 M-1 s-1) exceeding the lability of the coordinated ammines. (b) Armor,
J. N.; Scheidegger, H. A.; Taube, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 5928-
5929.
(15) Ostrich, I. J.; Gordon, L.; Dodgen, H. W.; Hunt, J. P. Inorg. Chem.
1980, 19, 619.
S0002-7863(97)02448-7 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society