3620
M. Chrysanthos et al. / Polymer 52 (2011) 3611e3620
based on the oligomeric resin is more reactive than the two others,
which behaves similarly. In all cases the maximum glass transition
temperature was obtained using a stoichiometric ratio equal to 1
which means that only epoxy-amine reactions occur. Networks
synthesized from the bio-based epoxy prepolymers have high glass
transition temperature, yet lower than the DGEBA based network.
However they have higher rubbery modulus due either to the lower
molar mass or to the higher functionality of the prepolymer. These
results suggest that isosorbide based epoxy precursors could be
good candidates to replace bisphenol A-based epoxy prepolymers.
However storage of these bio-based prepolymers must be done in
dry conditions because these compounds are hygroscopic and the
presence of water may deteriorate the properties of the networks,
depending on the type of hardener used [20].
Acknowledgment
0 n
Fig. 15. TGA curves of networks based on DGEBA, DGEDAS and DGEDAS in combi-
nation with IPD.
The authors acknowledge the financial support of FEDER (Fonds
Européens pour le Développement Economique Régional). The
authors are also thankful to Roquette (Lestrem, F) and Huntsman
Advanced Materials (Bâle, CH) for supplying samples and for the
synthesis of isosorbide based epoxies, and to the team of NMR
Polymer Center, Institut de Chimie de Lyon (ICL) for their help.
are compared to the theoretical value calculated from the molar
mass of the epoxy prepolymer and curing agent, Mcth. The molar
mass of the epoxy prepolymer was calculated from the value of the
epoxy equivalent and assuming a functionality of 2. Theoretical and
experimental results concerning M
networks based on pure monomers (DGEBA and DGEDAS
have a functionality of 2. For the network based on DGEDAS
c
are in agreement for the
References
0
) which
n
[1] Kaplan DL. Biopolymers from renewable resources. Berlin: Springer-Verlag;
oligomer a significant difference is noticed between the experi-
1998.
mental value and the theoretical value. This difference is due to the
[2] Gandini A. In: Pascault JP, Williams RJJ, editors. Epoxy polymers: new mate-
rials and innovations. Wiley-VCH; 2010.
wrong functionality used to calculate the theoretical M
confirms indirectly the complex chemical structure of DGEDAS
There are two types of crosslink points in DGEDAS based networks
Fig. 4):
c
and thus
[3] Shen L, Haufe J, Patel MK. Product overview and market projection of
n
.
emerging biobased plastics. PROBIP; 2009.
[4] Pascault JP, Sautereau H, Verdu J, Williams RJJ. In: Thermosetting polymers.
Taylor & Francis Books, Inc; 2002.
n
(
[
5] Miyagawa H, Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal L. Macromol Mater Eng 2008;289:
29e35.
[6] Miyagawa H, Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal L. Polym Eng Sci 2005;45:487e95.
6
4
. Thermal stability of the networks
[
[
[
7] Park SJ, Jin FL, Lee JR. Macromol Chem Phys 2004;205:2048e54.
8] Park SJ, Jin FL. Polym Int 2008;57:577e83.
9] Park SJ, Jin FL, Lee JR, Shin JS. Eur Polym J 2005;41:231e7.
The mass loss as a function of temperature for DGEBA, DGEDAS
and DGEDAS cured with IPD is shown in Fig. 15. The network
0
n
[10] Shabeer A, Sundararaman S, Chandrashekhara K, Dharani LR. J Appl Polym Sci
2007;105:656e63.
[11] Patel MB, Patel RG, Patel VS. J Therm Anal 1989;35:47e57.
12] SATO S. WO Patent 2009/080209 A1; 2009.
13] Chapin R. NTP-CERHR expert panel report on the reproductive and develop-
mental toxicity of bisphenol A. Birth Defects Res, Part B 2008;3:157e395.
[14] Acierno D, Russo P, Savarese R. PPS-24 2008 Salerno (Italy).
15] Takada Y, Shinbo K, Someya Y, Shibata MJ. Appl Polym Sci 2009;113:479e84.
16] Shibata M, Nakai K. J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys 2010;48:425e33.
DGEBAeIPD thermally degrades through a simple step process with
ꢀ
an initial degradation (T5%) close to 330 C and a maximum rate at
[
[
ꢀ
3
70 C. The TGA curve of the network obtained with DGEDAS
n
combined with IPD shows also a simple step process with an initial
ꢀ
ꢀ
degradation and a maximum rate, respectively at 330 C and 380 C,
[
[
very close to the values observed for DGEBAeIPD network. The
DGEDAS
0
eIPD network exhibits poorer thermal stability compared
[17] Morrison G. US Patent 3,041,300; 1962.
[18] Zech J. US Patent 3,272,845; 1966.
ꢀ
tothe other networks, with an initial degradation (T5%) at 305 C and
a maximum rate at 350 C. It is probably related to the low thermal
[
19] East A, Jaffe M, Zhang Y, Catalani LH.
a) US Patent 2008/0021209A1; 2008 (New Jersey Institute of Technology);
(b) US Patent 2008/0009599A1; 2008 (New Jersey Institute of Technology);
c) US Patent 7,619,056 B2; 2009 (New Jersey Institute of Technology);
20] Feng X, East AJ, Hammond WB, Zhang Y, Jaffe A. Polym Adv Technol 2011;22:
39e50.
ꢀ
(
stability observed on the DGEDAS
. Conclusions
In this work, two novel bio-based epoxy monomers were
0
prepolymer (Fig. 10).
(
[
[
5
1
21] Sachinvala ND, Winsor DL, Menescal RK, Ganjian I, Niemczura WP, Litt MH.
J Polym Sci, Part A: Polym Chem 1998;36:2397.
[22] Winter HH, Chambon F. J Rheol 1986;30:367e82.
[23] Hopton FJ, Thomas GHS. Can J Chem 1969;47:2395.
[24] Miller DR, Macosko CW. Macromol 1976;9:206e11.
successfully synthesized from renewable resources (isosorbide) via
two different routes. The chemical structures were studied in detail
1
13
using SEC, ESI-TOF MS, H and C NMR, and FTIR analysis. Digly-
cidyl ether of dianhydro-sorbitol (DGEDAS) was obtained either as
a pure monomer or as an oligomeric resin of higher functionality.
Reactivity and physical properties of these new epoxy prepolymers
cured with isophorone diamine (IPD) were compared with a tradi-
tional petroleum-derived epoxy prepolymer (DGEBA) cured with
the same hardener and under the same conditions. The system
[25] Galy J, Sabra A, Pascault JP. Polym Eng Sci 1986;26:1514e23.
[26] Fenouillot F, Rousseau A, Colomines G, Saint-Loup R, Pascault JP. Prog Polym
Sci 2010;35:578.
[27] Fuji M, Akita M, Tanaka T, EP Patent 2,033,981 A1; 2009, (Mitsubishi Chem.)
[28] Won YG, Galy J, Pascault JP, VerduPolym JJ. Sci, Part B: Polym Phys 1991;29:
81e7.
29] Won YG, Galy J, Gérard JF, Pascault JP, Bellenger V, Verdu J. Polymer 1990;31:
787e92.
[30] Nielsen LE. J Macromol Sci Rev Macromol Chem 1969;C3:69.
9
[
1