C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 3. TEM image of H-byp (2 mM), Fe(II) (0.3 mM), in HEPES (10
mM pH 7.0).
within the CTHs, and these sticky ends could promote fiber
formation. This fiber morphology was found to be lost at higher
concentrations of Fe(II) (1 mM) (see Supporting Information),
presumably because of the saturation of the bipyridyl ligand with
metal ions limiting peptide assembly and fiber growth.
In summary, we have introduced the concept of collagen fiber
formation through the radial growth of a collagen mimetic peptide,
H-byp, via a metal-assisted self-assembling trigger. We demonstrate
that the fiber formation was triggered through the addition of Fe(II)
and the assembly consisted of branched fibers at concentrations
below the ligand-metal binding stoichiometry. This system serves
as a proof of principle that collagen fibers can be initiated via
nonlinear assembly, and that modifications along the collagen
backbone may yield a new class of biologically active fibers. Future
studies will investigate how the ligand placement and coordination
chemistry can control the architectures of the collagen fibers.
Figure 2. (a) UV-vis titration of H-byp (54 µM) with Fe(II); (b) dynamic
light scattering of H-byp (1 mM), in 10 mM HEPES pH 7.0 (black), with
Fe(II) (500 µM) (red), and with Fe(II) (500 µM) and EDTA (100 mM)
(green).
incubation at 20 °C. A hydrodynamic radius of approximately 3
nm was observed for H-byp, consistent with other collagen triple
helical peptides.4 However, in the presence of Fe(II) a broad
distribution of radii were observed with a mean radius of 500 nm.
This suggested that the presence of Fe(II) facilitated the assembly
of larger aggregates. At lower peptide concentrations (250 and 50
µM) larger assemblies were also observed (mean radii of 200 and
150 nm, respectively) in conjuction with monomeric triple helices
(see Supporting Information). Next, we sought to investigate the
reversibility of the assembly by adding the metal chelator EDTA.
The data indicated that the assembly was completely reversible and
the assembled peptide returned to its monomeric triple helix. A
screen of other metal ions, such as Cu(II), Zn(II), and Ni(II) (see
Supporting Information) was also performed to determine if the
assembly process was specific to different metal ions. Of these,
Cu(II) was also found to promote the assembly of H-bpy.
Acknowledgment. We are grateful for financial support from
the NSF (Grant 0078923-CHE).
Supporting Information Available: Additional experimental details
and figures. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
References
(1) (a) Horch, R. E.; Kopp, J.; Kneser, U.; Beier, J.; Bach, A. D. J. Cell Mol.
Med. 2005, 9, 592–608. (b) Ramachandran, S.; Yu, Y. B. Biodrugs 2006,
20, 263–69.
(2) Koide, T. Connect. Tissue Res. 2005, 46, 131–41.
(3) Rele, S.; Song, Y.; Apkarian, R. P.; Qu, Z.; Conticello, V. P.; Chaikof,
E. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 14780–7.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to visualize
the morphology of the assembled H-byp-Fe(II) species. A solution
containing H-byp (2 mM) was preheated to 70 °C followed by the
addition of Fe(II) (0.3 mM) and a 4 day incubation at 4 °C (Figure
3). These conditions were implemented because previous studies
have found that preheating collagen like peptides to temperatures
near their Tm promote fibrillogenesis.10 Fibers were consistently
observed with lengths on the order of 3-5 µm, and a number of
the fibers displayed extensive branching. Closer inspection of an
unbranched region (see inset Figure 3) appeared to show bundles
of thinner fibers of approximately 10 nm in width. This value is
similar to the width of a metal bound trimer of triple helices (Figure
1c). Importantly, in the absence of Fe(II), no peptide assembly or
fiber formation was observed, consistent with the DLS observations.
It was interesting that with our radial design that fibers were
observed. It is possible that the radial assembly of CTHs may lead
to a bundle of CTHs that contain sticky ends due to staggering
(4) Cejas, M. A.; Kinney, W. A.; Chen, C.; Leo, G. C.; Tounge, B. A.; Vinter,
J. G.; Joshi, P. P.; Maryanoff, B. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 2202–3.
(5) Kotch, F. W.; Raines, R. T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 3028–
33.
(6) Paramonov, S. E.; Gauba, V.; Hartgerink, J. D. Biomacromolecules 2005,
38, 7555–61.
(7) (a) Dublin, S. N.; Conticello, V. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 49–51.
(b) Tsurkan, M. V.; Ogawa, M. Y. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 6849–51. (c)
Koide, T.; Yuguchi, M.; Kawakita, M.; Konno, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 9388–9. (d) Cheng, R. P.; Fisher, S. L.; Imperiali, B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 11349–56. (e) Ghadiri, M. R.; Soares, C.; Choi, C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 825–31. (f) Lieberman, M.; Sasaki, T. J. Am. Chem.
1991, 113, 1470–1.
(8) Persikov, A. V.; Ramshaw, J. A.; Kirkpatrick, A.; Brodsky, B. Biochemistry
2000, 39, 14960–7.
(9) Lever, A. B. P. Inorganic Electronic Spectroscopy; Elsevier Publishing
Co.: New York, 1968.
(10) (a) Kadler, K. E.; Vogel, B. E.; Hojima, Y.; Prockop, D. J. Collagen Relat.
Res. 1988, 8, 505–6. (b) Kar, K.; Amin, P.; Bryan, M. A.; Persikov, A. V.;
Mohs, A.; Wang, Y. H.; Brodsky, B. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 33283–90.
(c) Leikin, S.; Rau, D. C.; Parsegian, V. A. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1995, 2,
205–10.
JA804942W
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 38, 2008 12611