Cortistatin inhibits GH secretion
were collected immediately before (T=0) and 10, 20, and 30
min after drug administration.
All blood samples were immediately centrifuged, and plas-
ma was separated and stored at –20 C until processed for
GH assay.
A
Cortistatin
20
0
40 µg/kg
-20
-40
-60
-80
-100
GH assay
80 µg/kg
160 µg/kg
320 µg/kg
Plasma rat GH concentrations were determined in dupli-
cate by double antibody RIA using materials supplied by the
NHPP, NIDDK, NICHD, USDA, USA. Values are ex-
pressed in terms of rat-GH-RP-2 standard (potency 2
IU/mg) as ng/ml; intra-assay variability was 6%.
Statistical analysis
0
10
20
30
Statistical evaluation of results was performed by one-way
analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Dunnett’s t-
test for the comparison of differences between multiple
groups. A p<0.05 was considered to be significant.
B
Somatostatin
20
0
40 µg/kg
RESULTS
-20
-40
-60
-80
-100
Graded doses of CST-14 significantly decreased GH se-
cretion in adult male anaesthetized rats. All four doses of
CST-14 significantly inhibited GH secretion 10 and 20 min
after treatment (Fig. 1A). The effect of CST-14 had a rapid
onset, reached its maximal activity at 10 min and persisted
until 30 min post-treatment (about 50% inhibition at time
30). Calculation of the integrated GH secretion over the
30 min period (AUC0-30min) revealed that all doses effec-
tively inhibited GH secretion (AUC0-30min: 3750 179,
2079 104, 1859 279, 1658 174 and 1340 196 for saline,
CST-14 40, 80, 160 and 320 μg/kg, respectively; p<0.05).
Graded doses of native SS-14 inhibited GH release with a
profile almost superimposable to that of CST-14 (Fig. 1B).
Again, the maximal inhibitory activity was reached 10 min
after drug administration. SS, however, inhibited GH se-
cretion more effectively than CST at 20 min, but had lost al-
most completely its activity at time 30. Calculation of the
AUC0-30min showed a nice dose-dependent inhibitory effect
of SS on GH release (AUC0-30min: 3969 154, 3002 247,
2148 248, 1523 113 and 956 72 for saline, SS-14 40, 80,
160 and 320 μg/kg, respectively; p<0.05).
80 µg/kg
160 µg/kg
320 µg/kg
0
10
20
30
Time (min)
Fig. 1 - Inhibition of GH secretion following administration of cortistatin
(panel A) and somatostatin (panel B). Data are expressed as the percent
variation vs GH values in the control group. Each point represents the
mean SE of 6 determinations. Statistics: in panel A, all doses at time 10 and
20 and the 3 higher doses at time 30 are significantly different (p<0.05)
from respective controls. In panel B, all doses at time 10 and the 3 higher
doses at time 20 are significantly lower than respective controls (p<0.05).
family. The reported capability of CST-14 to bind to re-
ceptors for natural and synthetic GHS (5-7) is an exciting
possibility to develop selective antagonists to these recep-
tors.
The GHS receptors are widely distributed within the body
(8) where they participate in the regulation of different en-
docrine and non-endocrine functions (9, 10). It will be
therefore relevant to extend the comparison between CST
and SS, and their interactions, also to the other known ac-
tivities regulated by the GHS system.
The reported inhibitory activity of CST on GH secretion
and its similarity with SS cannot exclude a different mech-
anism of action. SS has its principal site of action on its pi-
tuitary receptors and CST, in addition to the latter, might
have also acted antagonizing the “physiological” stimulato-
ry tone of endogenous GHS. In line with this hypothesis,
CST-14 and the SS analog vapreotide, but not SS-14, have
DISCUSSION
For the first time we report herein that CST-14 is active
in vivo to reduce GH secretion in normal male anaesthetized
rats. The inhibitory activity of CST is clear-cut and dose-
related. Comparison with the inhibitory effect evoked by
graded doses of native SS-14 in the same experimental con-
ditions indicates that both neuropeptides share an over-
lapping GH-reducing activity, likely mediated by an action at
the five cloned SS receptor subtypes. This finding might sug-
gest a minor physiological relevance, as CST mRNA ex-
pression is relatively low in the hypothalamus (1). However,
the known different pharmacological profile of SS and CST
opens a new attractive window in the biology of the statin
RC32