Z. Wu et al. / Catalysis Communications 11 (2010) 973–976
975
Table 1
Chemical compositions and catalytic properties of catalysts.
Samples
Co loading
(wt.%)
SBET
S
Composition
(%)
TOF
Conversion
(%)
Selectivitiesc
Co
(m2/g)
(m2/gCo
)
(mol mol−1 s−1
)
a
b
CMO
HCAL
HCMO
CEE
Co–B(EP)/TiO2
Co–B(IR)/TiO2
Co–B(IR)/TiO2
Co/TiO2
Ag/TiO2
Raney Ni
13.9
15.0
15.0
15.0
0.2
42.5
37.2
36.7
–
15.7
7.5
0.5
2.8
0
Co52.1B47.9
Co68.7B31.3
Co68.7B31.3
–
–
–
0.27
0.24
0.017
0.054
–
98.0
40.9
0.2
3.5
b0.1
100
99.8
68.2
72.1
58.8
–
0
0.2
8.9
5.2
7.5
–
0
20.1
22.1
31.4
–
2.8
0.6
2.3
–
d
24.3
–
–
54.1e
0.079
23.2
65.7
11.1
0
a
The SCo was measured by the H2 chemisorptions, which were performed by using a dynamic pulse method. The catalyst was treated by an Ar stream at 200 °C for 1.0 h firstly,
which was well below its crystallization temperature.
b
Reaction turnover frequency which is defined as mole of reactant converted per mol of surface metal atom per second.
Hydrocinnamaldehyde: HCAL; cinnamyl alcohol: CMO; hydrocinnamyl alcohol: HCMO; and cinnamyl ethyl ether (C6H5CH CH–CH2–O–C2H5): CEE.
The catalyst was stored in air for 24 h.
The active surface area of nickel.
c
d
e
3.2. Activity and stability of catalysts
amorphous Ni–B nanoparticles prepared by chemical reduction
were sensitive to the oxygen, air and solvent (especially for water),
and the surface spices of nickel oxide or hydroxide occurred during
the storing and reactions [15–19], which agreed with other group's
work [10]. In fact, the review paper (ref. [10]) also pointed the similar
problem on the Co–B nanoparticles as Ni–B nanoparticles occurred.
So, we concluded that the deactivation of Co–B(IR)/TiO2 catalyst
maybe due to the surface changes, such as surface oxidation [10,15]. In
short, the Co–B(EP)/TiO2 catalyst exhibits higher activity and better
stability for selective hydrogenation of CAL than Co–B(IR)/TiO2.
Alternatively, the electroless plating provides a simple route to
synthesize high active and selective supported Co–B catalyst. In
addition, for the electroless plating, some Co2+ should be left in the
plating solution after plating due to the complexation of Co2+ and
Na2C4H4O6·2H2O, and the residual Co2+ can be recycled for a further
electroless plating, which also reduce the cost of preparation.
Table 1 summarizes the physical and catalytic properties of Co
catalysts. Blank experiment indicated that Ag/TiO2 precursor has a
negligible effect on the reaction. After the deposition of Co–B
nanoparticles on Ag/TiO2 supports, higher surface area was detected.
It is obvious that the higher the surface area of active metal (SCo), the
higher the turnover frequency (TOF) and conversion in CAL
hydrogenation, suggesting that the activity of Co catalyst is dependent
on the SCo. The low SCo value of Co/TiO2 should be ascribed to the
sintering of Co during H2 reduction because of the small surface area
of TiO2 and high metal loading. The porous Raney Ni catalyst presents
high SNi value, and exhibits the highest conversion when the same
amount of metal was used in hydrogenation. However, the amor-
phous Co–B exhibits higher intrinsic activity than Raney Ni catalyst
and crystallite Co catalysts. Deng et al. point that the unique short-
range ordering but long-range disordering structure of the amor-
phous alloy is responsible for its excellent activity and selectivity in
many hydrogenation reactions [21]. For Co–B nanoparticles, the Co
active site has a stronger synergistic effect between each other and is
more highly unsaturated than metal Co, which increases the activity
of Co atoms [3]. Thus, the amorphous Co–B shows high activity for
hydrogenation of CAL. Table 1 showed that the main products were
hydrocinnamaldehyde (HCAL), cinnamyl alcohol (CMO), and hydro-
cinnamyl alcohol (HCMO), and a little amount of cinnamyl ethyl ether
(CEE, C6H5CH CH–CH2–O–C2H5). The HCMO comes from the further
hydrogenation of HCAL and CMO, and the CEE is ascribed to the
reaction of CMO with ethanol or the direct reaction of CAL and ethanol
with H2 [24–26]. The Raney Ni catalyst shows the high selectivity
toward C=C bond hydrogenation to hydrocinnamaldehyde (HCMA),
but Co-based catalysts exhibit much higher selectivity of CMO [2]. The
amorphous Co–B nanoparticle catalyst shows a higher selectivity of
CMO than crystalline Co catalyst. For the amorphous Co–B nanopar-
ticles, some electrons partially transfer from B to Co, making Co
electron-enriched and B electron-deficient in the Co–B nanoparticles
[3–6]. The electron-deficient B enhances the total adsorption strength
of C=O group on Co–B, and the adsorption of hydrogen increases on
the electron-enriched Co active sites [3]. Both Co–B/TiO2 catalysts
show higher activity and selectivity than Co/TiO2. For the Co–B(EP)/
TiO2, the high SCo and B content result in a high TOF and selectivity of
CMO (99.8%). Unlike the Co–B(EP)/TiO2 catalyst stored in air, the Co–B
(IR)/TiO2 exhibits little hydrogenation activity after storing in air for
24 h.
4. Conclusions
The Co–B nanoparticles supported on TiO2 were prepared by the
electroless plating method. The porous Co–B nanoparticles were
Fig. 3 shows the stability of Co–B/TiO2 catalyst for the CAL
hydrogenation. The Co–B(EP)/TiO2 catalyst shows stable conversion
and selectivity of CMO during five runs. The conversion on Co–B(IR)/
TiO2 catalyst decreases with hydrogenation times, although the
selectivity is also stable. In our previous work, we found that
Fig. 3. Catalytic activities and selectivities of Co–B/TiO2 catalysts in the hydrogenation
of CAL.