2786
A. Khazaei et al.
SHORT PAPER
suction on a Büchner funnel, and washed with a little cold H2O and
recrystallized from EtOH; yield: 19.1g (95%); mp 139–140 °C.
IR (KBr): 3272, 2934, 1596, 1464, 1325, 1158, 1089, 816 cm–1.
1H NMR (acetone-d6/TMS): d = 1.63 (m, 2 H), 2.36 (s, 6 H), 2.88
(t, 4 H), 6.32 (br, 2 H), 7.37–7.62 (m, 8 H).
der reduced pressure, and Et2O (20 mL) was added to the mixture,
and stirred for 10 min. Then the sulfonamide 1, was removed by fil-
tration and the product was purified by column chromatography
(hexane–Et2O) (Table 1).
Products (aldehydes and ketones) were characterized by their phys-
ical constants, by comparison with authentic samples, and the melt-
ing points of 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone derivatives and by their
IR and 1H NMR spectra.
Anal. Calcd for C17H22N2O4S2: C, 53.38; H, 5.80; N, 7.32. Found:
C, 53.50; H, 6.00; N, 7.45%.
N,N¢-Dibromo-N,N¢-1,3-propylene-bis[(4-methylphenyl)sul-
fonamide] (2)
References
The sulfonamide 1 (10.0 g, 26 mmol) was dissolved in a slight mo-
lar excess of chilled aq NaOH solution (ca. 3 M) at r.t. and the solu-
tion was transferred to a beaker. A solution of Br2 (2.68 mL, 52
mmol) in CCl4 (6 mL) was added to the solution with vigorous stir-
ring. Immediately a yellow precipitate began to form. The yellow
precipitate was collected by suction on a Büchner funnel, washed
with cold distilled H2O (30 mL), and then dried in a vacuum desic-
cator at r.t. for 6 h; yield: 11.7g (83%). The product was stable at r.t.
and not sensitive to air.
IR (KBr): 2922, 1592, 1436, 1350, 1161, 812 cm–1.
1H NMR (acetone-d6/TMS): d = 1.62 (m, 2 H), 2.35 (s, 6 H), 2.87
(t, 4 H), 7.36–7.63 (m, 8 H).
(1) Sandler, S. R.; Karo, W. Organic Functional Group
Preparations, 2nd ed., Vol. 3; Academic Press: San Diego,
1989, 431–476.
(2) Green T. W., Wuts P. G. M.; Protective Groups in Organic
Synthesis; Wiley: New York, 1991; 2nd ed., 214.
(3) Donaruma, L. G.; Heldt, W. Z. Org. React. 1960, 11, 1.
(4) Olah, G. A.; Liao, Q.; Lee, S. C.; Surya Perakash, G. K.
Synlett 1993, 427.
(5) Drabowicz, J. Synthesis 1980, 125.
(6) Donaldson, R. E.; Saddler, J. C.; Boyrn, S.; Mckenzie, A. T.;
Fuchs, P. L. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 2167.
(7) Corey, E. J.; Hopkins, P. B.; Kim, S.; Kou, S.; Nambiar, K.
P.; Flack, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 1901, 7131.
(8) Curran, D. P.; Brill, J. F.; Rakiewicz, D. M. J. Org. Chem.
1984, 49, 1654.
Anal. Calcd for C17H20Br2N2O4S2: C, 37.80; H, 3.73; N, 5.18.
Found: C, 37.94; H, 3.90; N, 5.30.
(9) Barhate, N. B.; Gajare, A. S.; Wakharkar, R. D.; Sudalai, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 653.
(10) Loupy, A.; Bram, G.; Villemin, D. Solid Support and
Catalysts in Organic Synthesis ; Smith, K., Ed.; Ellis-
Harwood: Chichester UK, 1992, Chap. 12, 302–326.
(11) Khazaei, A.; Shirdarreh, A. Synth. Commun. 1999, 29, 4079.
Deoximation of Oximes; General Procedure
A mixture of the oxime (3 mmol) and 2 (973 mg, 1.8 mmol), in ac-
etone (10 mL) and H2O (1 mL) was introduced in a flask and re-
fluxed under microwave irradiation in a microwave oven at a power
output of 200 W for the appropriate time as indicated in Table 1. Af-
ter completion of the reaction (TLC), the solvent was removed un-
Synthesis 2004, No. 17, 2784–2786 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York