H. Zhang et al. / Catalysis Communications 59 (2015) 161–165
163
Table 1
Screening and control experiments for hydrogenation of p-nitrophenol.
2.3. Reduction reactions of nitroarenes
In a 25 mL round bottom flask, nitroarenes (1.0 mmol, 1 eq.) were
dissolved in a mixture of 10 mL H O–EtOH (1:1, v/v). Then, sodium bo-
rohydride (5.0 mmol, 5 eq.) and Cu6/7Co1/7Fe –G (0.25) (20 mg)
2
2 4
O
were added. The mixture was stirred at 323–343 K for an appropriate
time depending upon the nature of the substrate. Upon completion of
the reaction (monitored by TLC), the mixture was cooled to room tem-
perature and the catalyst was separated by a magnet for recycling tests.
The reaction mixture was extracted with ether (3 × 10 mL). The organic
Entry
Catalyst
Catalyst
mg)
Temperture
(K)
Time
(min)
Yield
(%)
(
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
–
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
10
20
20
20
20
343
343
343
343
343
343
343
343
343
343
333
323
313
343
343
343
343
343
500
500
60
60
500
500
60
9
3
3
9
13
60
7
–
G
Trace
26
39
Trace
Trace
33
99
39
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
88
99
4
phase were combined together and dried over anhydrous MgSO .
Fe
Fe
NiFe
MnFe
CoFe
3
O
O
4
4
3
–G(0.25)
–G(0.25)
–G(0.25)
–G(0.25)
The solvent was evaporated under vacuum. The pure products were ob-
tained by silica-gel column chromatography using petroleum ether:
ethylacetate (4:1) as the eluent.
2
O
O
2 4
O
2 4
4
CuFe
CuFe
2
O
O
4
–G(0.25)
–G(0.25)
3. Results and discussion
2
4
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Cu6/7Co1/7Fe
Cu6/7Co1/7Fe
Cu6/7Co1/7Fe
Cu6/7Co1/7Fe
Cu6/7Co1/7Fe
Cu3/4Co1/4Fe
Cu1/2Co1/2Fe
Cu6/7Co1/7Fe
Cu6/7Co1/7Fe
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
O
4
O
4
O
4
O
4
O
4
O
4
O
4
O
4
O
4
–G(0.25)
–G(0.25)
–G(0.25)
–G(0.25)
–G(0.25)
–G(0.25)
–G(0.25)
/NP–G(0.25)
/N–G(0.25)
2 4
3.1. Characterization of Cu6/7Co1/7Fe O –graphene
The FTIR spectra were recorded to testify the hybrid material. As
shown in Fig. 1, the spectrum of GO is in good agreement with previous
9
−
1
14
60
12
work [32]. The broad, intense band at 3250 cm
is assigned to the
−1
stretching of O–H. The peak at 1616 cm (aromatic C_C) can be as-
cribed to the skeletal vibrations of unoxidized graphene domains. The
Reaction condition: p-nitrophenol (1 mmol), solvent (10 ml, EtOH: water = 1:1), NaBH
5 mmol).
4
_
−1
C O bond is associated with the band at 1047 cm . From the FTIR
spectrum of GO, it can be clearly seen that the graphene oxide exhibits
(
−
1
an obvious characteristic absorption peak at about 1728 cm corre-
_
_
sponding to the stretching of the C_O and COOH groups. However,
it cannot be seen from the FTIR spectrum of CuFe –G (0.25) and
Cu6/7Co1/7Fe –G (0.25). It turned out that graphene oxide was
2 4
O
for 12 h. 0.144 g (0.576 mmol) of CuSO
Co(NO ·6H O and 0.3618 g (1.34 mmol) of FeCl
of ethylene glycol and sonicated for 1 h. The above two solutions were
then mixed together and stirred for 30 min. After that, the mixture was
·5H
4 2
O, 0.028 g (0.096 mmol) of
2 4
O
3
)
2
2
3
were added to 10 mL
reduced to graphene due to the strong reducing capability of ethylene
glycol during the preparation process. From the FTIR spectrum of
CuFe O –G (0.25) and Cu6/7Co Fe O –G (0.25) samples, the spectra
2 4 1/7 2 4
−
1
adjusted to pH of 8 with 6 mol L NaOH aqueous solution and stirred
for 30 min, yielding a stable homogeneous emulsion. The resulting mix-
ture was transferred into a 70 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave
and heated to 180 °C for 24 h under autogenous pressure. After the reac-
tion mixture was cooled down to room temperature, the precipitate was
filtered, washed with distilled water and ethanol, and dried in a vacuum
oven at 30 °C for 12 h. The product was labeled as Cu6/7Co1/7Fe
0.25). CuFe –graphene (CuFe –G) (0.25) was synthesized with
the same method without adding Co(NO ·6H O. For comparison, the
same method was also used to synthesize Cu6/7Co1/7Fe /NP–graphene
0.25) and Cu6/7Co1/7Fe /N–graphene (0.25) by adjusting to pH of 8
with NH ·H O (30%), while Cu6/7Co1/7Fe
adding 0.32 g polyvinyl pyrrolidone.
show a strong absorption corresponding to the stretching vibration of
−
1
the tetrahedral and octahedral sites around 586 and 400 cm , respec-
tively. The observed values illustrate that the frequency bands
−
1
appearing at 586 and 400 cm
metal oxide (CuFe and Cu6/7Co1/7Fe
596 cm on spectrum referred to the vibration of remainder H
are responsible for the formation of
). The absorption band at
O in
2
O
4
2 4
O
−
1
1
2
2 4
O –G
the sample [4,27].
Fig. 2 shows the SEM and TEM images of Cu6/7Co1/7Fe O –G (0.25)
2 4
2 4
sample. It can be seen that Cu6/7Co1/7Fe O –G were composed of
quasi-sphere particle with particle sizes of about 20 nm. It clearly
demonstrated that a crystal structure with spherical shape was formed.
X-ray powder diffraction analysis was used to identify the crystal
(
O
2 4
2 4
O
3
)
2
2
2 4
O
(
2 4
O
3
2
2
O
4
/NP–graphene (0.25) with
structure of the CuFe
shown in Fig. 3, except some Cu impurity peaks at 43.5° and 50.6°, all
peaks were indexed to be CuFe (JCPDS 77–0010), in detail, the
2 4 2 4
O –G (0.25) and Cu6/7Co1/7Fe O –G (0.25). As
2 4
O
peaks at 18.3° 30.0°, 35.5°, 53.5°, 57.1°, 62.6° and 74.1° are attributed
to (111), (220), (311), (422), (511), (440) and (533) crystal planes of
CuFe
was observed. It is speculated that the graphene in the CuFe
0.25) and Cu6/7Co1/7Fe –G (0.25) heteroarchitecture was fully
2 4
exfoliated due to the crystal growth of CuFe and Cu6/7Co1/7Fe O
2
O
4
while no typical diffraction peak of reduced graphene oxide
2 4
O
–G
(
2 4
O
2
O
4
nanoparticles between the interlayer of graphene sheets, which result
in the low diffraction intensity of graphene. Furthermore, no visible
peak corresponding to Co can be detected, which is ascribed to the
fine dispersion of Co or the insertion into the CuFe
formation of copper was identified based on the reported data (JCPDS
5–1326) at 43.5° and 50.6°. The reason of existence of metallic copper
2 4
O matrix. The
8
2
+
may be that some of Cu were reduced to copper metal in the forma-
tion process of CuFe and Cu6/7Co1/7Fe due to the strong reducing
O
2 4
2 4
O
capability of ethylene glycol [27,28]. The result is consistent with that
reported in the documents [33].
The energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy was shown in Fig. S1
(see Supporting information). Obviously, Co, Fe, Cu, C and O in the
Fig. 4. Successive UV–vis absorption spectra of the reduction of p-nitroaniline with NaBH
in the presence of Cu6/7Co1/7Fe –G (0.25) under 323 K.
4
2 4
O