.
Angewandte
Communications
At the start of our work, the reduction of nitrobenzene
was investigated as a benchmark system. Optimization of the
reaction conditions (temperatures, hydrogen sources, catalyst
loading, and solvents; see also the Supporting Information,
Table SI1) showed that the best results were obtained in
tetrahydrofuran at 708C, where full conversion and up to
99% yield of aniline were observed. Among the different
hydrogen sources (Table 1, entries 1–5) an azeotropic 5:2
1) direct reduction and 2) an indirect pathway involving
condensation of the initially formed nitrosoarene and the
hydroxylamine to produce azo derivatives.[18] The feasibility
of this second route was investigated by using azoxybenzene
or azobenzene as reactants. These experiments were carried
out using a higher cluster loading (20 mol%), because the
transient nature of these intermediates during the reaction
from nitrobenzene makes the relative amount of catalyst
much higher than the normal catalytic amount. The reduction
of azobenzene needed up to 18 h to reach a conversion of
90%, with only a 25% yield of aniline. When azoxybenzene
was used as a reactant, azobenzene appeared as the primary
product (20% yield) and aniline was only formed in 16%
yield. Therefore, we conclude that the formation of aniline in
the presence of the active molybdenum hydride cluster
preferentially takes place through the direct reduction route.
Obviously, cluster catalysis requires that the polynuclear
metal fragment remains intact during the catalytic cycle or at
least that mononuclear species, which are produced from
cluster decomposition, are not responsible for the catalytic
activity. To prove cluster catalysis, several experiments were
carried out using various lower nuclearity molybdenum
complexes (Table SI3) in the presence and absence of the
dmpe ligand under the optimized catalytic conditions. In all
cases, little or no reactivity was observed, which shows the
unique behavior of the Mo3S4 hydride. Further evidence of
cluster integrity during the catalytic reaction comes from
reaction monitoring by electrospray ionization mass spec-
trometry (ESI-MS) techniques, which in turn can be used to
extract valuable mechanistic information.[19] For ESI-MS
reaction monitoring, the recently reported pressurized
sample infusion (PSI) method was used.[20] Under catalytic
conditions, the base peak corresponds to Et3NH+, which
inhibits ionization of the rest of the cluster species under ESI
conditions. Consequently, higher cluster loading (50 mol%) is
needed when ESI-MS is used to unravel the nature of the
species present during the reaction. For this purpose, the
reaction mixture was heated to 708C and re-examined over
time for 90 min, whereupon a 25% yield of aniline was
formed (Figure 2).
At room temperature (t = 0 min), a prominent peak
centered at m/z = 870.9 is initially observed, which is assigned
to [Mo3S4H3(dmpe)3]+ (1+) hydride on the basis of the m/z
value as well as its characteristic isotopic pattern. Additional
signals of the monosubstituted [Mo3S4H2(OOCH)(dmpe)3]+
(2+) and disubstituted [Mo3S4H(OOCH)2(dmpe)3]+ (3+) for-
mate complexes at m/z = 914.8 and m/z = 959.8, respectively,
are also observed. After 15 min, the trisubstituted [Mo3S4-
(OOCH)3(dmpe)3]+ (4+) formate complex is also identified at
m/z = 1000.8. After 30 min (up to 90 min), only 1+ and 4+ are
observed and their relative intensities remain largely
unchanged, indicating that a stationary state has been
achieved. Apparently, 1+ is the active species, which is
subsequently regenerated from the 4+ formate cluster. Addi-
tional support for this hypothesis is provided by investigation
of the characteristic gas-phase dissociation of 4+ by collision
induced dissociation (CID) experiments, which are commonly
used to unravel elementary steps in catalytic cycles.[21] In
general, these experiments demonstrate that Mo–formate
Table 1: Reductant testing for the reduction of nitrobenzene catalyzed by
molybdenum clusters.[a]
Entry
X
Reducing agent
Conversion [%][b]
Yield [%][b]
1
2
3
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Cl
Cl
Cl
HCOOH/Et3N (5:2)
HCOO(NH4)
HCOOH
PhSiH3
>99
32
23
>99
9
73
41
–
65
>99
>99
29
22
75
5
73
35
–
4[c]
5[d]
6[e]
7[f]
8[f]
9
H2
HCOOH/Et3N (5:2)
–
–
HCOOH/Et3N (5:2)
HCOOH/Et3N (5:2)
63
>99
10[g]
[a] Reaction conditions: nitrobenzene (0.1 mmol), reducing agent
(3.5 equiv), catalyst (3 mol%), THF (2 mL), 10 h, 708C. [b] Determined
by GC analysis using n-hexadecane as an internal standard. [c] Catalyst
(8 mol%), 18 h. [d] 5 or 30 bar H2, 15 h, 808C. [e] Catalyst (2 mol%).
[f] Catalyst (55 mol%), 18 h. [g] 19 h.
mixture of HCOOH and NEt3 gave the best result as
a reducing agent. Longer reaction times are required when
formic acid or formates were used for the reduction. The
reaction selectivity decreased (75% yield) when expensive
silanes such as phenylsilane are employed. Relevant mecha-
nistic information is obtained from the lack of reactivity
observed when the reaction is carried out under H2, as only
traces of aniline (5%) are detected. This result clearly
indicates that Mo3S4-mediated nitro reduction catalysis
occurs by transfer hydrogenation, discarding the possibility
of direct hydrogenation by hydrogen generated from formic
acid decomposition.
Furthermore, optimal quantities of reducing agent were
found by gradually increasing the concentration of formic
acid using the azeotropic HCOOH/NEt3 5:2 mixture. In the
presence of stoichiometric amounts (3 equiv) of HCOOH,
a 97% yield of aniline is obtained; thus indicating that there is
basically no unproductive decomposition of formic acid to
hydrogen (Table SI2).
Because of safety concerns, the formation of hydroxyl-
amine as a reaction intermediate constitutes a drawback in
some catalytic reductions of nitroarenes. Fortunately, in our
case the conversion of nitrobenzene occurred almost quanti-
tatively with > 99% yield of aniline. No traces of hydroxyl-
amine were observed during catalysis (< 1%; Figure SI1).
From a mechanistic point of view, the (transfer) hydro-
genation of nitroarenes can occur through two routes:
2
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!