R. Mart ´ı n et al. / Tetrahedron 64 (2008) 6270–6274
6273
electroluminescent molecules. However, we consider that the ini-
4.1.3. 9,10-Bis[4-(2-(3-(N-1,2-dimethylimidazoliumyl)propylthio)-
tial molar ratio of the mixture employed here is more relevant to
the present study in which compound 7 has two imidazolium units
per diarylanthracenyl core. Thus, in a simplistic manner, the ad-
vantage of the covalent attachment is to ensure a fixed lumino-
phore ionic liquid ratio avoiding viscosity effects and problems
associated with the active layer preparation.
ethyl)phenyl]anthracene bischloride (6)
A solution of 9,10-bis[4-(2-(3-chloropropylthio)ethyl)phenyl]-
anthracene (4) (80 mg, 0.133 mmol) and 1,2-dimethylimidazole (5)
(24 ml, 0.266 mmol) in dry toluene (5 ml) was heated at reflux
temperature under Ar atmosphere for 48 h. After removal of the
solvent, diethyl ether was added and the evolved solid filtered to
obtain 9,10-bis(4-(2-(3-(N-1,2-dimethylimidazoliumyl)propylth-
3
. Conclusion
io)ethyl)phenyl)anthracene bischloride (6) (95 mg, 93.1%) as
1
a brown material. H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl
3
):
d
(ppm)¼7.80–7.35
Analogously to the precedents reporting the beneficial in-
(m, 16H; arom. H), 6.96þ6.84 (sþs, 1þ1H, –CH]CH–), 3.68 (t,
J¼6.3 Hz, 2ꢂ2H; N–CH ), 3.61 (s, 3H, N–CH ), 3.11 (t, J¼7.9 Hz,
), 2.82 (t, J¼6.0 Hz,
), 2.19 (q, J¼6.1 Hz,
(300 MHz, CDCl ):
fluence of ionic liquids on the efficiency of electroluminescent
cells, herein we have observed that a molecule derived from DPA
containing two peripheral imidazolium units exhibits over one
order of magnitude efficiency enhancement as compared to the
parent molecule. This effect seems to arise from the blocking of
spurious current flow and a more efficient charge injection into
the active layer. Compared to mixtures of luminophore and ionic
liquid, the covalent attachment presents the advantage of film
preparation, ensuring the fixed luminophore-to-ionic liquid ratio.
Overall, our report illustrates the benefits of applying the concept
of ionophilicity to OLED cells.
2
3
2ꢂ2H; CH
2ꢂ2H; Ar–CH
2ꢂ2H; CH –CH
2
–S), 2.97 (t, J¼7.2 Hz, 2ꢂ2H; S–CH
2
2
–CH
2
), 2.45 (s, 3H, C–CH
3
13
2
2
–CH
2
);
C
NMR
3
d
(ppm)¼133.92, 131.41, 129.83, 128.55, 126.88, 125.91, 124.89,
120.34, 53.95, 49.23, 43.48, 36.19, 32.17, 29.61, 29.21, 26.71; IR
ꢀ
1
(KBr):
n
(cm )¼3045, 2939, 2864, 2232, 1716, 1684, 1606, 1513,
1441, 1399, 1310, 1263, 1098, 1025, 941, 813, 771, 670, 544. ESI-
2
þ
2þ
364.1, found m/z 413
MS: Calcd for C46
H
56
N
4
S
2
(MþH)
ꢀ
ꢀ 2þ
2
)
(MHþAcO þHCO
.
4
.1.4. 9,10-Bis(4-(2-(3-(N-1,2-dimethylimidazolyl)propylthio)-
ethyl)phenyl)anthracene bishexafluorophosphate 7
saturated aqueous solution of ammonium hexa-
4
4
4
. Experimental section
A
.1. Synthesis of organic compounds
fluorophosphate was mixed with 9,10-bis(4-(2-(3-(N-1,2-dime-
thylimidazoliumyl)propylthio)ethyl)phenyl)anthracene bischloride
(6) (90 mg, 0.117 mmol) by ultrasonication for 12 h until appear-
ance of an orange solid corresponding to 9,10-bis(4-(2-(3-(N-1,
.1.1. Synthesis of 9,10-bis-(4-vinylphenyl)anthracene (3)
9
,10-Distyrylanthracene was prepared according to the method
4
4,45
reported in the literature.
9,10-Dibromoanthracene (6.04 g,
2-dimethylimidazolyl)propylthio)ethyl)phenyl)anthracene bishex-
1
18 mmol), 4-vinylphenylboronic acid (7.98 g, 54 mmol), ground
afluorophosphate (7) (110 mg, >95%). H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl
3
):
t
potassium carbonate (8.292 g, 108 mmol) and Pd
2
(dba)
3
/Pd(P Bu
3
)
2
d
(ppm)¼7.80–7.3 (m, 16H; arom. H), 7.20þ6.95 (sþs, 1þ1H,
–CH]CH–), 3.74 (s, 3H, N–CH ),
), 3.64 (t, J¼6.3 Hz, 2ꢂ2H; N–CH
3.13 (t, J¼7.4 Hz, 2ꢂ2H; S–CH ), 2.93 (t, J¼7.2 Hz, 2ꢂ2H; CH –S),
2.81 (t, J¼6.9 Hz, 2ꢂ2H; Ar–CH –CH ), 2.74 (s, 3H, C](N)C–CH ),
2.13 (q, J¼6.3 Hz, 2ꢂ2H; CH –CH ); C NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl ):
(ppm)¼132.09, 131.72, 130.17, 128.93, 128.85, 127.25,
125.35, 125.28, 54.32, 49.78, 43.86, 34.03, 31.79, 29.60, 27.10, 26.15;
(
108.8:30.6 mg, 0.12:0.06 mmol, 1 mol Pd%) in dry toluene (300 ml)
3
2
ꢁ
were stirred magnetically in a pre-heated oil bath at 110 C for 48 h
under nitrogen atmosphere. After this time, the suspension was
filtered while hot under vacuum and the solvent was evaporated
under vacuum, allowing a further evaporation to remove any sty-
rene formed. The crude was submitted to partition in CH
the organic phase was collected, dried and CH Cl evaporated un-
der reduced pressure to obtain a bright yellow solid (6.28 g,
2
2
2
2
3
13
2
2 2
–CH
3
d
2 2
Cl /water,
ꢀ
1
2
2
IR (KBr):
n
(cm )¼3046, 2944, 2862, 2238, 1689, 1604, 1512,
1446, 1408, 1393, 1313, 1263, 1023, 913, 843, 815, 770, 740, 670, 644,
549. ESI-MS: Calcd for C46
ꢀ1
þ
16.4 mmol, 91%). IR (KBr)
n
(cm ): 1668, 1627, 1508, 1438, 1392,
H
56
N
4
S
2
, 724.9, found 759 (100)
1
ꢀ
ꢀ þ
þ
1110, 1029, 991, 941, 908, 875, 829; H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl
3
)
(MHþCl ), 761 (33) (MHþCl ) ; ESI-MS/MS for the (MHþCl) peak
þ
ꢀ
ꢃ
þ
ꢀ
d
(ppm): 7.75 (4H, dd, J¼4 Hz, 7 Hz), 7.65 (4H, d, J¼8 Hz), 7.45 (4H, d,
m/z: 759 (MHþCl) , 661 (MHþCl ꢀC
5
H
10
N
2
) , 563 (MHþCl ꢀ2ꢂ
ꢃ
þ
5 10 2
C H N ) .
J¼8 Hz), 7.30 (4H, dd, J¼4 Hz, 7 Hz), 6.90 (2H, dd, J¼11 Hz, 18 Hz),
13
5
.90 (2H, d, J¼18 Hz), 5.40 (2H, d, J¼11 Hz); C NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl (ppm): 136.7 (2C), 134.9, 134.8, 129.7, 128.0, 125.1, 124.4,
3
) d
123.2, 112.3. MS: m/z 382.
4.2. Preparation of light emitting cells
4
.1.2. 9,10-Bis(4-(2-(3-chloropropylthio)ethyl)phenyl)anthracene (4)
-Chloropropanethiol (51 l, 0.523 mmol) was added to a solu-
tion of 9,10-distyrylanthracene (3) (100 mg, 0.262 mmol) and AIBN
Commercial ITO transparent electrode (OC50 on 175
ester, 40–60 U/sqr, 85% transmittance) was rinsed with Alcanox
m
m poly-
Ò
3
m
then with MilliQ water, dried and submitted to deep UV irradiation
for 15 min. Recently clean ITOs were spin coated with an aqueous
solution of PEDOT–PSS {Aldrich, poly(styrenesulfonate)/poly(2,3-
dihydrothieno[3,4-b]-1,4-dioxin), 1,3 wt % dispersion in water} at
2000 rpm. After drying the film in a laminar flux hood, the elec-
(
10 mg) in dry toluene (5 ml). The solution was exhaustively
ꢁ
degassed for 30 min before heating at 110 C for 24 h. The reaction
mixture was stirred magnetically while heated. After the required
time, the solvent was removed in vacuum and 9,10-bis(4-(2-(3-
chloropropylthio)ethyl)phenyl)anthracene (4) (98 mg, 95%) was
2 2
trode was submitted again to spin coating with a CH Cl solution of
1
obtained as
a
yellow solid.
H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl
3
):
DPA (2.5 mg/ml), ionophilic compound 7 (7.5 mg/ml) or a mixture of
DPA and 1,2-dimethyl-3-(3-mercaptopropyl)imidazolium (DMPIM)
hexafluorophosphate (2.5:4.8 mg/ml, respectively, in a 1:1 AcN/
d
(ppm)¼7.85–7.30 (m, 16H; arom. H), 3.73 (t, J¼6.3 Hz, 2ꢂ2H; CH
Cl), 3.11 (t, J¼8.1 Hz, 2ꢂ2H; ArCH CH –S), 2.99 (t, J¼8.1 Hz, 2ꢂ2H;
ClCH CH CH –CH ), 2.14 (q,
–S), 2.81 (t, J¼6.9 Hz, 2ꢂ2H; Ar–CH
J¼6.3 Hz, 2ꢂ2H; CH C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl ):
(ppm)¼139.97, 137.36, 137.19, 132.11, 130.18, 128.69, 127.28,
2
–
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 2
CH Cl solution). The speed of the spin coater was adjusted be-
1
3
2
–CH
2
–CH
2
);
3
tween 1500 and 2500 rpm. After drying, the concentration of an-
thracene units was determined by transmission optical
spectroscopy of the transparent electrode using a Cary 5 Varian SG
spectrophotometer. Finally, the counter electrode was deposited by
subliming aluminum in a chemical vapor deposition chamber
d
ꢀ
1
1
2
25.86, 43.64, 36.60, 33.87, 32.86, 29.63; IR (KBr):
n
(cm )¼3043,
932, 2850, 2232, 1699, 1603, 1514, 1440, 1392, 1306, 1270, 1207,
1
2 2
101, 1021, 998, 890, 769, 673, 539. ESI-MS: Calcd for C36H36Cl S
þ
þ
ꢀ6
(
MH) 603, found m/z 610 (MHꢀLi) .
(Edwards) operating at 10 mbar.