Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
6862 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 64, No. 18, 1999
Melvin et al.
Our interest in the 4-methoxypyrrolic natural products
has been focused on gaining an understanding of their
DNA-targeting properties. Previously, we demonstrated
that tambjamine E (1, Figure 1) facilitates oxidative DNA
cleavage in the presence of copper(II) without the aid of
an external reductant.19 This implied that Cu(I) was
formed reductively through the concomitant oxidation of
1 to a π-radical cation. The tambjamine was found to bind
DNA and Cu(II) effectively, and on the basis of quenching
experiments that argued against participation of a freely
diffusible hydroxyl radical, a copper-oxo species was
proposed to initiate DNA strand scission.19
While our preliminary findings established DNA as a
potential therapeutic target for 1, information is lacking
on the structural basis for DNA binding, specificity of
copper-mediated DNA cleavage (if any), and nature of
oxidative DNA damage (extent of H-abstraction from the
deoxyribose sugars vs oxidation of DNA bases). Deter-
mination of these facets of tambjamine chemistry would
facilitate an understanding of their mode of action in a
biological system. Comparison to the corresponding DNA-
targeting activities of prodigiosin 220 and the tetrapyrrole
3 could then provide the necessary insight for the design
and synthesis of superior polypyrrolic DNA targeting
molecules that may serve as more effective antimicrobial
or anticancer agents.
F igu r e 2. Structures of unfused aromatic cations that bind
DNA.
resent an interesting class of DNA targeting agents. The
bipyrrole coupled to the enamine or pyrromethene enable
these compounds to bind DNA, coordinate redox-active
metal ions such as Cu(II)19 and facilitate oxidative DNA
strand scission in the presence of Cu(II) without the aid
of an external reducing agent.19,20
Here, we focus on the DNA-binding properties of
tambjamine E (1) and prodigiosin (2) as representative
members of the 4-methoxypyrrolic natural products.
These compounds possess unfused aromatic ring systems
that bear cationic charge at physiological pH. This latter
property was found to be critical for DNA binding as the
neutral aldehyde precursor 4 was found to lack the ability
to bind DNA effectively. The fluorescent properties of 1
and 2 permitted us to gain insight into their mode of DNA
binding. These compounds exhibit small emission inten-
sities in water that is dramatically increased in organic
solvents. This phenomenon was also observed for DNA
binding. Energy transfer from the DNA helix (donor) to
the 4-methoxypyrrolic natural product (acceptor) sug-
gested that these compounds bind DNA by intercalation
with a preference for AT sequences. This behavior differs
from other unfused aromatic cations, such as DAPI,21
furamidine,22 and the bithiazole of bleomycin23-26 (Figure
2), whose pharmacological properties have been cor-
related with their DNA targeting activities. For these
compounds, a growing body of evidence implies that they
bind AT sequences by a minor-groove binding mode,
while intercalation is favored at GC sites.21-26
Exp er im en ta l Section
Com p ou n d s. The sample of tambjamine E (1) was obtained
from the organic extracts of the marine ascidian Atapozoa sp.,
as described previously.3,19 Concentrations of 1 were obtained
from UV-vis measurements in methanol: (ꢀ405 ) 24,700 M-1
cm-1).3 Prodigiosin (2) was a gift from the Natural Products
Division of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and was
received as a dark red powder. Confirmation of prodigiosin
1
structure was obtained by H NMR spectroscopy and electro-
spray mass spectrometry (ES+): [M + H]+ ) 324.2. Stock
solutions of 2 were prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO),
and concentrations were determined by UV-vis in 95%
EtOH-HCl (ꢀ535 ) 112 000 M-1 cm-1).18 The bipyrrole aldehyde
precursor 4 was derived from 1 through base hydrolysis using
the protocol described by Faulkner.1 The aldehyde 4 was
obtained as a yellow residue, and its identity was verified by
1H NMR,1,5,10 and ES+: [M + H]+ ) 191.1.1 Concentrations of
4 were obtained from UV-vis (MeOH, ꢀ364
) 6200 M-1 cm-1).1
Bu ffer s. Buffer solutions were prepared from the follow-
ing: MOPS (3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid), MES (2-
(N-morpholino)ethanesufonic acid, CHES (2-(cyclohexylamino)-
ethanesulfonic acid), CAPS (3-(cyclohexylamino)propanesulfonic
acid (Aldrich), using distilled, deionized water from a Milli-Q
system. Sodium chloride or sodium perchlorate (NaClO4) were
added to adjust the ionic strength, and the pH was adjusted
using NaOH.
Our findings, together with our cleavage results,19,20
show that the 4-methoxypyrrolic natural products rep-
DNA. Calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA, Sigma) was sonicated
and phenol-extracted prior to use, while polyd[G-C]2 and polyd-
[A-T]2 (Sigma) were used without further purification. The
polymer concentrations were determined by applying the
appropriate molar extinction coefficients: ꢀ260 ) 12 824 M-1
cm-1 in base pair (bp) for CT-DNA, ꢀ254 ) 8400 M-1 cm-1 in
base for polyd[G-C]2,27 and ꢀ260 ) 6800 M-1 cm-1 in base for
polyd[A-T]2.28
Kin etic Meth od s. Reactions were followed spectrophoto-
metrically using a Hewlett-Packard (HP-8452) UV-vis spec-
trometer at 392 nm for 1 and 362 nm for 4. Hydrolysis
reactions were initiated by adding 2 µL of a stock solution of
1 (15 mM) in DMSO to a 3-mL cuvette containing 2 mL of
(19) Borah, S.; Melvin, M. S.; Lindquist, N.; Manderville, R. A. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4557.
(20) Prodigiosin 2 also effects oxidative DNA strand scission in the
presence of copper(II) without the aid of an external reducing agent.
Melvin, M. S.; Lindquist, N, Manderville, R. A. Unpublished results.
(21) Wilson, W. D.; Tanious, F.; Barton, H.; J ones, R.; Strekowski,
L.; Boykin, D. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5008.
(22) Wilson, W. D.; Tanious, F. A.; Ding, D.; Kumar, A.; Boykin, D.
W.; Colson, P.; Houssier, C.; Bailly, C. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
10310.
(23) Manderville, R. A.; Ellena, J . F.; Hecht, S. M. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1995, 117, 7891.
(24) Wu, W.; Vanderwall, D. E.; Liu, S. M.; Tang, X.-J .; Turner, C.
J .; Kozarich, J . W.; Stubbe, J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10843.
(25) Sucheck, S. J .; Ellena, J . F.; Hecht, S. M. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1998, 120, 7450.
(27) Wells, R. D.; Larson, J . E.; Grant, R. C.; Shortle, B. E.; Cantor,
C. R. J . Mol. Biol. 1970, 13, 407.
(28) Inman, R. B.; Baldwin, R. L. J . Mol. Biol. 1962, 5, 172.
(26) Cortes, J . C.; Sugiyama, H.; Ikudome, K.; Saito, I.; Wang, A.
H.-J . Biochemistry 1997, 36, 9995.