Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
solvents such as pentane and toluene, consistent with its ionic
formulation.
The electronic structure of the anionic iron complex in 2 has
been probed by DFT calculations (B3LYP/def2-TZVP/SVP).
Structural optimization of the full complex provides bond
metrics that reproduce those found in the solid-state structure
Fe−N bond distances (2.050(2) and 2.024(2) Å) are similar to
48
57
those in related S = 2 iron(II) complexes. The Fe
Mo
̈
ssbauer spectral parameters (δ = 0.76 mm/s and ΔE =
Q
3.13 mm/s at 80 K) also support the S = 2 iron(II)
formulation. The complex has also been characterized in
1
solution by H NMR spectroscopy and Evans’ magnetic
Table S2). Natural orbital analysis of the electronic structure
moment (μeff = 5.4(2) μ ). Complex 3 can be independently
B
reveals doubly occupied orbitals with significant σ- and π-
synthesized by reaction of the iron(II) chloride complex
t
29
[Ph B( BuIm) FeCl(THF)] with 2 equiv of DippNHK in
2 2
the presence of 18-crown-6.
1
Interestingly, DippNH can be clearly observed in the H
2
NMR spectrum of crystalline samples of 3, suggesting the
equilibrium:
3
⇆ 2 + H NDipp
2
Using mesitylene as the internal standard, the equilibrium
1
constant was determined by H NMR spectroscopy to be K
eq
−
3
≈
8 × 10 mol/L at room temperature. While common for
49−51
early metal complexes,
the formation of an imido ligand
by amine loss from the corresponding diamido complex is
39,52
unusual for iron.
The evidence for a nucleophilic imido ligand in 2 prompted
us to investigate its activity toward substrates known to be
active in [2 + 2] cycloaddition reactions. In an initial
i
demonstration, we find that 2 reacts with equimolar PrN
i
t
CN Pr to provide the yellow complex [Ph B( BuIm) Fe-
2
2
i
(
PrN) CNDipp][K(18-C-6)THF ] (4) in 92% yield (Scheme
2
2
2
). The molecular structure of 4 reveals a four-coordinate iron
46
center (τ = 0.8) that is coordinated by the bis(carbene)-
borate and a newly formed guanidinate ligand (Figure 1). The
Fe−N (2.031(2) and 1.998(2) Å) and Fe−C (2.126(2) and
2
.119(2) Å) bond distances are similar to those for S = 2
48
iron(II) complexes. The S = 2 assignment is further
5
7
supported by the zero-field Fe Mossbauer spectrum (δ =
̈
0
also been characterized in solution by H NMR spectroscopy
and Evans’ magnetic moment (μeff = 5.0(1) μB).
.62 mm/s and ΔE = 4.20 mm/s at 80 K). The complex has
Q
1
The molecular structure of 4 can be described as the result
i
i
of PrNCN Pr insertion into the iron imido bond. This
contrasts with early transition metal imido complexes, which
react with carbodiimides to provide the corresponding [2 + 2]
3
,53
azametallocyclobutanes.
Nonetheless, the formation of 4
Figure 2. Selected orbitals showing the FeN σ and π interactions
that are in the C−Fe−C plane; (a) π* HOMO; (b) π-bonding
HOMO−6; (c) σ-bonding HOMO−7. Natural orbitals shown with
isodensity = 0.05.
can be rationalized according to a reaction sequence in which
an initial formal [2 + 2] cycloaddition reaction between 2 and
i
i
54
PrNCN Pr is followed by [1,3]-Fe migration. It is
worth noting that, with the exception of [(IMes)Fe-
NDipp)2], iron imido complexes are typically unreactive
24
(
iron−nitrogen π* character, which serves to decrease the
multiple bond character of the iron−nitrogen bond. The
based (Figure S48). As a consequence of this electronic
structure, the computed spin density is mainly located on the
spin density (+0.22) on the imido nitrogen atom (Figure S47).
In light of the negative charge on the complex, we
anticipated that the imido ligand in 2 to have nucleophilic
character. In accord with this expectation, 2 reacts with 1 equiv
toward carbodiimides. Indeed, carbodiimides are often formed
as the products of nitrene transfer from iron imido complexes
to isonitriles.
31
As expected from the equilibrium between 3 and 2, complex
i
4 can also be formed from the reaction of 3 with excess PrN
i
CN Pr. Moreover, 3 is formed from the reaction of excess
DippNH
with 4, which also provides equimolar N-2,6-
2
diisopropylphenyl-N′,N″-diisopropylguanidine, as character-
1
ized by H NMR spectroscopy and GC-MS.
Together, the stoichiometric reactions suggest 2 as a catalyst
for carbodiimide guanylation. Guanidines find widespread
application, e.g. building blocks toward complex organic
compounds, superbase catalysts and versatile supporting
t
of DippNH to provide yellow [Ph B( BuIm) Fe(NHDipp) ]-
2
2
2
2
[
K(18-C-6)THF ] (3) in 88% yield (Scheme 2). The
2
molecular structure of 3, as determined by single crystal X-
ray diffraction (Figure 1), reveals a four-coordinate iron center
(
5
5,56
ligands.
We observe smooth conversion of equimolar
4
6
i
i
τ = 0.9) bound by the bis(carbene)borate ligand and two
PrNCN Pr and DippNH
2
to N-2,6-diisopropylphenyl-
4
7
anilido ligands. The Fe−C (2.133(2) and 2.125(2) Å) and
N′,N″-diisopropylguanidine in the presence of 5 mol % 2, with
5
326
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 5324−5329