LETTER
Selective Oxidation of Fructose to 2,5-DFF with Heterogeneous IBX Amide
167
Furthermore, direct conversion of fructose to DFF was highly-selective oxidation of HMF to DFF under mild
performed.16
conditions. Moreover, we showed that readily-prepared,
polymer-supported IBX amide reagent with solid-acid
catalyst was suitable for the direct conversion of fructose
to DFF. We expect that our efforts would be helpful for
the development of other processes related to biomass-
derived chemical production.
Acknowledgment
This work has been supported by the Seoul Fellowship and the
WCU (World Class University) program through the Korea Science
and Engineering Foundation funded by the Ministry of Education,
Science and Technology (grant number R32-2008-000-10213-0).
Scheme 4 Direct conversion of fructose to DFF under heterogene-
ous conditions in an one-pot reaction
Acid-catalyzed dehydration of fructose followed by sub-
sequent oxidation of HMF was performed in a one-pot
reaction. It is well known that HMF can be produced with
high yield in the presence of DMSO and Brønsted acid.
However, due to the high solubility of HMF and high boil-
ing point of DMSO, isolation of HMF still remains to be
addressed. Therefore, direct production of DFF from fruc-
tose without isolation of HMF would be helpful in devel-
oping an industrial process (Scheme 4).
References and Notes
(1) (a) Bridgwater, A. V. Chem. Eng. J. 2003, 91, 87.
(b) Corma, A.; Iborra, S.; Velty, A. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107,
2411.
(2) (a) Werpy, T.; Petersen, G.; Aden, A.; Bozell, J.; Holladay,
J.; White, J.; Manheim, A.; Elliot, D.; Lasure, L.; Jones, S.;
Gerber, M.; Ibsen, K.; Lumberg, L.; Kelley, S. Top Value
Added Chemicals from Biomass, In Results of Screening for
Potential Candidates from Sugars and Synthesis Gas, Vol.
1; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE): Oak Ridge, TN,
2004. (b) Chheda, J. N.; Huber, G. W.; Dumesic, J. A.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7164.
(3) Kunkes, E. L.; Simonetti, D. A.; West, R. M.; Serrano-Ruiz,
J. C.; Gärtner, C.; Dumesic, J. A. Science 2008, 322, 417.
(4) (a) Lewkowski, J. ARKIVOC 2001, (i), 17.
(b) Lichtenthaler, F. W. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 728.
(c) Ribeiro, M. L.; Schuchardt, U. Catal. Commun. 2003, 4,
83.
(5) (a) Gandini, A.; Belgacem, N. M. Polym. Int. 1998, 47, 267.
(b) Gandini, A.; Belgacem, N. M. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1997,
22, 1203.
(6) Richter, D. T.; Lash, T. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 6735.
(7) (a) Takimiya, K.; Otsubo, T.; Ogura, F.; Ashitaka, H.;
Morita, K.; Suehiro, T. Chem. Lett. 1994, 23, 255.
(b) Adams, H.; Bastida, R.; de Blas, A.; Carnota, M.; Fenton,
D. E.; Macías, A.; Rodriguez, A.; Rodriguez-Blas, T.
Polyhedron 1997, 16, 567.
(8) (a) Del Poeta, M.; Schell, W. A.; Dykstra, C. C.; Jones, S.;
Tidwell, R. R.; Czarny, A.; Bajic, M.; Kumar, A.; Boykin,
D.; Perfect, J. R. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998, 42,
2495. (b) Hopkins, K. T.; Wilson, W. D.; Bendan, B. C.;
McCurdy, D. R.; Hall, J. E.; Tidwell, R. R.; Kumar, A.;
Bajic, M.; Boykin, D. W. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3872.
(9) (a) Sheibley, D. W.; Manzo, M. A.; Gonzalez-Sanabria,
O. D. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1983, 130, 255. (b) Daub, J.;
Salbeck, J.; Knöchel, T.; Fischer, C.; Kunkely, H.; Rapp,
K. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1989, 28, 1494.
(10) (a) Cottier, L.; Descotes, G.; Lewkowski, J. Synth. Commun.
1994, 24, 939. (b) Partenheimer, W.; Grushin, V. V. Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 102. (c) Grushin, V.; Partenheimer,
W.; Manzer, L. E. US 2003/0055271, 2003. (d) Halliday,
G. A.; Young, R. J. Jr.; Grushin, V. V. Org. Lett. 2003, 5,
2003. (e) Carlini, C.; Patrono, P.; Galletti, A. M. R.; Sbrana,
G.; Zima, V. Appl. Catal., A 2005, 289, 197.
Figure 4 Conversion of fructose (substrate, diamond) along with
the production of HMF (circle), DFF (square) and unknown chemi-
cals (triangle) in a one-pot reaction in the presence of Amberlist 15®
resin and polymer-supported IBX amide reagent (DMSO, 100 °C)
Fructose was converted with approximately 95% yield to
HMF (60%) and DFF (27%) within 1 hour (Figure 4). As
the reaction proceeded, HMF was gradually consumed
while DFF was produced. After 3 hours, 36% of HMF re-
mained with the yield of DFF reaching 48%. However,
unknown chemicals including two main byproducts,
AMF (5-acetoxymethyl-2-furaldehyde) and OBMF {5,5¢-
[oxybis(methylene)-bis-2-furaldehyde]}, were also in-
creased in amount as reaction time was prolonged.17
In conclusion, we have described the first application of a
recyclable polymer-supported IBX amide reagent for the
(f) Amarasekara, A. S.; Green, D.; McMillan, E. Catal.
Commun. 2008, 9, 286. (g) Navarro, O. C.; Canos, A. C.;
Chornet, S. I. Top. Catal. 2009, 52, 304.
Synlett 2011, No. 2, 165–168 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York