C.-M. Chu et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46(2005) 4971–4974
4973
O
O
O
SH
I
(5 mol%)
2
+
+
o
0 C, neat, 8min
OMe
SPh
PhS
SPh
4
2a
5
6
1.1equiv
2.2 equiv
78%
_
10%
>99%
Scheme 2.
preparation of 3. Surprisingly, at ambient temperature
within 8 min 35% of 3aa was observed (entry 2). When
the similar reaction was repeated at 0 ꢁC for the same
time, it resulted in the formation of the product 3aa in
90% yield (entry 3). In order to confirm, the amount
of iodine required for the above transformation, differ-
ent experiments were carried out by varying the amount
of iodine I2. Either using 10 or 5 mol % of catalytic
amounts of iodine at 0 ꢁC, resulted in the quantitative
yield of 3aa with the same efficiency. These results
clearly indicate that, the use of 5 mol % of I2 is sufficient
to catalyze the Michael addition reaction in excellent
yield.9 The reason for the lower product yield with a
higher amount of iodine in case of cyclohexenone may
be ascribed due to the decreased catalytic activity, which
in turn leads to polymerization of the starting materials.
On the other hand, the reaction temperature plays an
important role with different substrates. For instance,
in a reaction with thiol 2a, the enones methlvinyl ketone
1c and benzilideneacetone 1d use 5 mol % of iodine, the
former requires 0 ꢁC and the later needs 25 ꢁC. The
probable reason might be the steric bulkiness of the later
enone. To prove the versatility of iodine catalyzed Mi-
chael addition reactions, a variety of enones 1a–d were
reacted with phenyl thiol 2a in the presence of 5 mol %
of iodine to obtain the quantitative yields of the product
(Table 1).
Encouraged by the above results, we also examined the
reaction of a different enone such as 4-methoxy-3-but-
ene-2-one 4 with 2a under similar conditions. In the
presence of 1.1 equiv of 1a, 78% of 5 and 10% of 6 were
generated (Scheme 2). However, only quantitative yield
of 6 was obtained by changing the amount of 2a from
1.1 to 2.2 equiv. The generation of compound 5 indi-
cates that the reaction proceeds through the substitution
of the methoxy groupof 4 by 2a and the compound 6
has been generated from the addition of another equiv-
alent of 2a to the intermediate product 5.
In conclusion, we have successfully demonstrated a sim-
ple and efficient methodology to prepare a wide variety
of Michael adducts using iodine in catalytic amounts.
The powerful catalytic activity of the iodine for these
transformations can be substantiated by the less reac-
tion times as well as high product yields. This environ-
mentally benign process for the generation of Michael
adducts represents a suitable option to the existing pro-
cedures, especially enones with different substitution.
Acknowledgements
Financial support for this work by the National Science
Council of the Republic of China and National Taiwan
Normal
acknowledged.
University
(ORD93-C)
is
gratefully
After optimizing the best condition using cyclohexenone
1a and thiol 2a, the generality of the iodine catalyzed
reaction was examined by selecting a number of a,b-
unsaturated ketones 1a–g as well as thiols 2a–f11 (Table
2). As expected, excellent yields of product 3 were gener-
ated under solvent-free condition at 0 ꢁC within 2–
8 min. Both cyclic and acyclic enones were reacted with
various thiols to afford the products in excellent yields.
A little decrease in the product yield was observed in a
reaction with 2f using cyclohexenone. In the case of
Michael acceptor such as 1-cyclohexenyl-methyl ketone,
the product was formed in 96% yield using 5 mol % of
iodine as catalyst. b,b-Disubstituted enone 1f and a,b-
disubstituted enone 1g can react with thiophenol 2a rap-
idly to afford Michael adducts in quantitative yield.
According to these results, we found that not only the
unsubstituted enone such as methyl vinyl ketone but
also the b-monosubstituted enone such as 1a, 1b, 1d
and 1e or the b,b-disubstituted enone 1f or a,b-disubsti-
tuted enone 1g can react with thiophenol 2a rapidly.
These results indicate that the I2 catalyzed reactions
were not affected by the presence of the steric hindrance
between 1 and 2 and both alkyl and aryl substituted
groupalso have no effect on the reaction yield.
References and notes
1. (a) Fluharty, A. L. In The Chemistry of the Thiol Group;
Patai, S., Ed.; Wiely: New York, 1974, Part 2, p589; (b)
Clark, J. H. Chem. Rev. 1980, 80, 429; (c) Fujita, E.;
Nagao, Y. J. Bioorg. Chem. 1977, 6, 287.
2. (a) Trost, B. M.; Keeley, D. E. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40,
2013; (b) Shono, T.; Matsumura, Y.; Kashimura, S.;
Hatanaka, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 4752; (c)
Nishimura, K.; Ono, M.; Nagaoka, Y.; Tomioka, K. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12974.
3. (a) Hiemstra, H.; Wiberg, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103,
417; (b) Suzuki, K.; Ikekawa, A.; Mukaiyama, T. Bull.
Soc. Chem. Jpn. 1982, 55, 3277; (c) Yamashita, H.;
Mukaiyama, T. Chem. Lett. 1985, 363; (d) Emori, E.;
Arai, T.; Sasai, H.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 4043.
4. (a) Kobyashi, S.; Ogawa, C.; Kawamura, M.; Sugiura, M.
Synlett 2001, 983; (b) Bandini, M.; Cozzi, P. G.; Giaco-
mini, M.; Melchiorre, P.; Selva, S.; Umani-Ronchi, A. J.
Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3700; (c) Srivastava, N.; Banik, B. K.
J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 2109; (d) Alam, M. M.; Varala,
R.; Adapa, S. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 5115; (e)