Mendeleev Commun., 2019, 29, 380–381
Table 1 Transfer hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds in PriOH catalyzed
entries 11, 12). At 82°C for 5 h, the main product was citronellol
15 (73%), while the yield of fully hydrogenated dihydrocitronellol
16 was 25% only. Apparently, conjugated enal moiety of citral is
reduced faster than remote C=C bond that makes contribution in
selectivity of TH. Expectedly, dihydrocitronellol 16 becomes the
main product (94%) at 150°C when nothing of citronellol 15 is
detected. Obviously, decrease in reaction time and/or reaction
temperature can help to control the reaction selectivity from
partial to full hydrogenation. Another feature of this reaction is
a little decarbonylation of citral3 followed by fast reduction of
thus formed C9-hydrocarbon to fully hydrogenated 2,6-dimethyl-
heptane 17 (2% at 82°C vs. 6% at 150°C).
In conclusion, the TH reaction catalyzed by Raney nickel
at boiling point of PriOH demonstrates the synthetic potential
for reduction of unsaturated monoterpenoids or other olefins/
aldehydes/ketones. The method is simple and does not require
the use of flammable gaseous H2 or corrosive strong bases. The
reaction is carried out in standard laboratory glassware without
special equipment. The procedure is applicable for reduction of
sterically hindered or low-reactive substrates.
by Raney nickel.a
Entry Substrate T/°C
Conversion (%) Product compositionb (%)
1
2
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
82
150
82
> 98
>98
>98
>98
65
7 (2) + 8 (98)
7 (4) + 8 (96)
9 (>98)
9 (>98)
10 (>98)
3
4
150
82
5
6
150
82
98
10 (>98)
7
>98
98
11 (97) + 12 (3)
11 (98) + 12 (1) + 13 (1)
14 (>98)
14 (>98)
15 (25) + 16 (73) + 17 (2)
15 (94) + 17 (6)
8
150
82
9
27
10
11
12
150
82
53
>98
>98
150
a Conditions: substrate (0.3–0.5 g, 3.2 mmol), PriOH (120 ml, 1.5 mol),
Raney nickel (0.25 g, ~3.8 mmol of nickel), 5 h at specified temperature.
b GC–MC data, the starting substrate is excluded.
reference substrates.† All reaction courses were monitored by
GC–MS.
This work was performed within the framework of the budget
project at G. K. Boreskov Institute of Catalysis.
Under the reaction conditions, both C=C and C=O bonds
underwent hydrogenation. Conversion of hex-5-en-2-one 1, cyclo-
hexanone 2, carvone 4, and citral 6 achieved ca. 100% at both
temperatures 82 and 150°C (Table 1, entries 1–4, 7, 8, 11, 12).
Due to steric and electronic hindrances, the reduction of menthone 3
and camphor 5 occurred slower than that of cyclohexanone 2.16
Conversion of menthone 3 reached 67 and 98% for 5 h at 82 and
150°C, respectively (entries 5, 6). Since reactivity of camphor 5
is lower, only 27 and 53% of it was converted under the same
conditions (entries 9, 10). The process was chemoselective as
diastereomeric menthols 10 or borneols 14 were the only products.
Unlike menthone 3, the conversion of structurally similar
carvone 4 was higher (~100%) at both reference temperatures
(see Table 1, entries 7,8) to provide the same fully hydrogenated
carvomenthol 11 (as a mixture of diastereomers) with selectivity
of 97–98%. The possible reason could be difference in adsorption of
menthone 3 and carvone 4 on the catalyst surface, the conjugated
enone moiety of carvone 4 having facilitated its adsorption and
subsequent reduction. A small amount of carvone 4 was also
isomerized to carvacrol 13 at 150 °C. This reaction can be
accelerated at high temperatures using many catalysts including
Raney nickel.17
Online Supplementary Materials
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found
in the online version at doi: 10.1016/j.mencom.2019.07.006.
References
1 F. Devred, B. W. Hoffer, W. G. Sloof, P. J. Kooyman, A. D. van Langeveld
and H. W. Zandbergen, Appl. Catal., A, 2003, 244, 291.
2 E. V. Shuvalova, O. A. Kirichenko and L. M. Kustov, Russ. Chem. Bull.,
Int. Ed., 2017, 66, 34 (Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Khim., 2017, 34).
3 G. Calvaruso, J. A. Burak, M. T. Clough, M. Kennema, F. Meemken and
R. Rinaldi, ChemCatChem, 2017, 9, 2627.
4 C. Chesi, I. B. D. de Castro, M. T. Clough, P. Ferrini and R. Rinaldi,
ChemCatChem, 2016, 8, 2079.
5 M. J. Gilkey and B. Xu, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 1420.
6 R. C. Mebane and A. J. Mansfield, Synth. Commun., 2005, 35, 3083.
7 R. C. Mebane, K. L. Holte and B. H. Gross, Synth. Commun., 2007, 37,
2787.
8 J. Li, S. Cheng, T. Du, N. Shang, S. Gao, C. Feng, C. Wang and Z. Wang,
New J. Chem., 2018, 42, 9324.
9 F. Alonso, P. Riente and M. Yus, Acc. Chem. Res., 2011, 44, 379.
10 A. A. Philippov, A. M. Chibiryaev and O. N. Martyanov, J. Supercrit.
Fluids, 2018, 145, 162.
ˇ
11 P. Kukula and L. Cervený, Res. Chem. Intermed., 2000, 26, 913.
Citral 6 (as a mixture of neral and geranial) demonstrates
high activity in TH at both reaction temperatures (see Table 1,
12 E. Plessers, G. Fu, C. T. Y. Xiang, D. E. De Vos and M. B. J. Roeffaers,
Catalysts, 2016, 6, 104.
13 E. Plessers, D. E. DeVos and M. B. J. Roeffaers, J. Catal., 2016, 340, 136.
14 G. P. Boldrini, D. Savoia, E. Tagliavini, C. Trombini andA. Umani-Ronchi,
J. Org. Chem., 1985, 50, 3082.
15 F. Devred, A. H. Gieske, N. Adkins, U. Dahlborg, C. M. Bao, M. Calvo-
Dahlborg, J. W. Bakker and B. E. Nieuwenhuys, Appl. Catal., A, 2009,
356, 154.
16 M. L. Casella, G. F. Santori, A. Moglioni, V. Vetere, J. F. Ruggera,
G. M. Iglesias and O. A. Ferretti, Appl. Catal., A, 2007, 318, 1.
17 E. C. Horning, J. Chem. Soc., 1945, 10, 263.
†
The reactions were carried out at 82°C (the boiling point of PriOH)
in standard laboratory glassware or at 150°C in 300 ml autoclave with
magnetic stirring for 5 h under argon atmosphere. The temperature of
150°C was reasoned by low reactivity of monoterpenoids in the TH
reaction.13,16 Monoterpene compound (0.3–0.5 g, 3.2 mmol) dissolved in
PriOH (120 ml, 1.5 mol) was mixed with Raney nickel catalyst (0.250 g,
~3.8 mmol of nickel) freshly prepared by well-known method based on
leaching with aq. NaOH at 50°C from Raney alloy (Al:Ni = 50:50).18
Physicochemical properties of prepared Raney nickel were in good
agreement with reported data.18 BET surface area of the catalyst was
50–70 m2 g–1 and did not change dramatically during the reactions. Thus,
despite the high nickel-to-substrate molar ratio (1.2:1), only about 5% of
all Ni atoms were located on the surface of the catalyst. According to
XPS method, the residual aluminum content in the catalyst was 10.3%.
X-ray powder diffraction demonstrated the phase of metallic nickel formed
from Al3Ni and Al3Ni2 intermetallics of initial alloy.
18 J. Freel, W. J. M. Pieters and R. B. Anderson, J. Catal., 1969, 14, 247.
Received: 4th February 2019; Com. 19/5816
– 381 –