NURMUKHAMETOVA et al.
6
3. Hudlický, M., Reductions in Organic Chemistry,
Washington DC: Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 2nd ed.
4. Lindlar, H. and Dubuis, R., Organic Syntheses,
Corey, E.J., Ed., New York: Wiley, 1966, vol. 46, p. 89.
5. Monguchi, Y., Ichikawa, T., and Sajiki, H., Chem.
Pharm. Bull., 2017, vol. 65, p. 2.
reduced pressure (0.02 mm Hg) for 24 h at 120°C. The
catalyst was placed in 30-mm steel cartridges with
combined steel reticular and Teflon membranes at the
inlet under reduced pressure (5 mm Hg), and steel
reticular and Teflon membranes were fastened on the
outlet using a CatCart Packer™ tool.
6. Saikia, H., Borah, B.J., Yamada, Y., and Bharali, P.,
General procedure for hydrogenation in a flow
reactor. A vial with a semipermeable membrane was
charged with 10 mL of a solution of a nitro compound
with a concentration of 0.05 M (10 mL), and the vial
was placed in an automated sample feeder of
ThalesNano H-Cube™. The catalyst cartridges were
mounted in the 6-channel CatCart Changer™. The
solution was passed through the reactor with
automated sampling under the following conditions:
temperature 100°C, pressure 10 bar, flow rate
0.5 mL/min. After a cycle of catalytic screening,
the samples were analyzed by GC/MS.
J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2017, vol. 486, p. 46.
7. Lesiak, M., Binczarski, M., Karski, S., Maniukie-
wicz, W., Rogowski, J., Szubiakiewicz, E., Berlow-
ska, J., Dziugan, P., and Witonska, I., J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem., 2014, vol. 395, p. 337.
8. Lambert, S., Ferauche, F., Brasseur, A., Pirard, J.-P.,
and Heinrichs, B., Catal. Today, 2005, vol. 100, p. 283.
9. Li, X., Wang, X., Liu, M., Liu, H., Chen, Q., Yin, Y.,
and Jin, M., Nano Res., 2018, vol. 11, p. 780.
10. Mohamed, D.Kh.B., Yu, X., Li, J., and Wu, J., Tetra-
hedron Lett., 2016, vol. 57, p. 3965.
11. Newman, S.G. and Jensen, K.F., Green Chem., 2013,
vol. 15, p. 1456.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
12. Plutschack, M.B., Pieber, B., Gilmore, K., and
Seeberger, P.H., Chem. Rev., 2017, vol. 117, p. 11796.
13. Riley, D.L. and Neyt, N.C., Synthesis, 2018, vol. 50,
p. 2707.
14. Burilov, V.A., Nurmukhametova, A.T., Belov, R.N.,
Mironova, D.A., Vorob’ev, V.V., Osin, Yu.N., and
Antipin, I.S., Russ. Chem. Bull., Int. Ed., 2018, vol. 67,
no. 3, p. 461.
15. Aguado, J., Arsuaga, J.M., Arencibia, A., Lindo, M.,
and Gascón, V., J. Hazard. Mater., 2009, vol. 163,
p. 213.
16. Jiang, X., Koizumi, N., Guo, X., and Song, Ch., Appl.
Catal. B, 2015, vols. 170–171, p. 173.
This study was performed under financial support
by the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 18-73-
10 033). The SEM study was performed at the
Analytical Microscopy Interdisciplinary Center of the
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University. The authors
thank the staff of the Synthesis and Analysis of Thin
Film Systems Laboratory for performing XPS
measurements on the equipment of the Federal Joint
Center for Physicochemical Studies of the Kazan
(Volga Region) Federal University.
17. Chusuei, C.C., Brookshier, M.A., and Goodman, D.W.,
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
Langmuir, 1999, vol. 15, p. 2806.
18. Ghijsen, J., Tjeng, L., Elp, J., Eskes, H., Westerink, J.,
Sawatzky, G., and Czyzyk, M., Phys. Rev. B: Condens.
Matter Mater. Phys., 1988, vol. 38, p. 11322.
The authors declare the absence of conflict of
interests.
19. Liu, S., Li, Y., Ta, N., Zhou, Y., Wu, Y., Li, M.,
Miao, S., and Shen, W., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2018,
vol. 526, p. 201.
20. Armarego, W.L.F. and Chai, C.L., Purification of
Laboratory Chemicals, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2009,
6th ed.
REFERENCES
1. Sajiki, H. and Monguchi, Y., Pharmaceutical Process
Chemistry, Shioiri, T., Izawa, K., and Konoike, T., Eds.,
Weinheim: Wiley, 2010, p. 77.
2. Nishimura, S., Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalytic
Hydrogenation for Organic Synthesis, New York:
Wiley, 2001.
21. CasaXPS: Processing Software for XPS, AES, SIMS
and More, Version 2.3.18, 2016.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Vol. 55 No. 1 2019