S.-M. Lam, Z.H. Jaffari, J.-C. Sin et al.
Journal of Molecular Liquids 326 (2021) 115372
material surface were an effective strategy to enhance the photocata-
lytic performance. It has been revealed that noble metal cocatalysts
can serve as electron reservoirs to suppress the recombination of charge
carrier of the adjacent catalysts as well as provided more active catalytic
sites [12]. Moreover, such “electron reservoirs” approach is able to
strengthen the electron density of noble metals and raised the intrinsic
photoactivity of catalysts, which can make them act as better candidates
for visible light driven applications [13]. Among gold (Au) has always
been one of the broadly explored materials in variety areas of research
owing to its excellent optical and electrical properties. The Au nanopar-
ticle demonstrated good visible light absorption because of the
interband transition (5d band to 6sp band) [14].
As the wastewater from agricultural and industrial activities not
only comprised the waste pollutants, but also several microorgan-
isms which can cause environmental issues and human health, re-
searchers have always been keen to explore multifunctional
materials that can be exploited for more than one application. In
this report, the gold-decorated on the coral-like magnetic BiFeO3
(Au-BiFeO3) composites have been fabricated by simple two-
steps hydrothermal method. The as-fabricated composite with
coral-like structure displayed outstanding ability for sunlight
photodegradation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). 2,4-
D as a typical herbicide compound which was widely used in agri-
cultural production and posing a significant adverse effect [4]. The
incorporation of Au nanoparticle on the coral-like BiFeO3 also dem-
onstrated a good antibacterial activity toward Escherichia coli
(E. coli). The active radicals during photodegradation process
were also assessed by radical trapping test and the electron spin
resonance (ESR) technique and thus the photocatalytic mechanism
was postulated.
2.3. Material characterization
The surface morphology of bare BiFeO3 and Au-BiFeO3 samples were
captured using a field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM,
Quanta FEG 450), transmission electron microcopy (TEM, Tecnai
G220), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM,
JEM-200 CX). Crystalline structure was measured using an X-ray diffrac-
tion (XRD, Philips PW 1820) diffractometer. The elemental composition
of the samples was assessed using an energy dispersive X-ray (EDX)
instrument coupled with a FESEM. The X-ray photoelectron spectra
(XPS) was examined using a Thermo Escalab 250Xi spectrometer. The
N2 physisorption isotherm was recorded using a Brunauer Emmett
Teller analyzer (BET, ASAP 2020 M). The diffuse reflectance spectra
of bare BiFeO3 and Au-BiFeO3 samples were taken using a Perkin
Elmer L35 spectrophotometer. The photoluminescence (PL) spectra of
as-prepared materials were recorded using a Perkin Elmer S55 spectro-
photometer. The magnetic hysteresis (M-H) loops of the samples were
determined using a MicroSense 10 Mark ΙΙ analyzer. The zeta potential
of the Au-BiFeO3 composite was recorded using a Malvern Zetasizer
Nano-Z.
2.4. Photoelectrochemical measurements
Photoelectrochemical analyses on the samples were investigated
using an electrochemical workstation (Gamry Interface 1000) in a
three-electrode system containing 0.5 M sodium sulfate as an electro-
lyte solution. Samples were coated on fluorinated tin oxide (FTO)
glass, which acted as a working electrode. Ag/AgCl and platinum wire
were applied as a reference electrode and a counter electrode, respec-
tively. Transient photocurrent response was investigated with 30 s off/
on cycles with a bias potential of 0.4 V vs Ag/AgCl. The Nyquist plot
was performed in the frequency from 0.1 to 104 Hz and linear sweep
voltammetry (LSV) was executed at 50 mV/s scanning rate.
2. Experimental section
2.1. Reagents
2.5. 2,4-D photodegradation test
Iron nitrate (Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, 98%), methanol (98%), tetrachlorogold
(III)-saurehydrat (HAuCl4, 99%) and nitric acid (HNO3, 65%) were ob-
tained from ChemSoln. Bismuth nitrate (Bi (NO3)3·5H2O, 98%) and
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D, 97%) was acquired from Merck
and Sigma-Aldrich, respectively. Potassium hydroxide (KOH, 85%) and
urea (99.5%) were purchased from R & M Chemicals. All reagents were
utilized as received and deionized water (Milipore System, 18.2 Ω)
was utilized as solvent.
The photoactivity of the composite was investigated in a designated
photoreactor setup comprising light source and two mounted fans in an
acrylic black enclosure. Typically, 1 g/L of the catalyst was placed in a
100 mL of 20 mg/L 2,4-D solution. The test was first conducted under
dark condition for 30 min to achieve adsorption-desorption equilibrium
between the solids and solution under magnetic stirring. The solution
was then placed under sunlight with the measured light intensity of
865.7 W/m2. Throughout the test, the air with a flow rate of 2 mL/min
was constantly bubbled in the solution. At different time intervals, the
sample solution was determined using a high performance liquid chro-
matography (HPLC, Perkin Elmer Series 200) equipped with a C18 col-
umn (150 mm × 4.6 mm × 5 μm). The wavelength of UV detector was
fixed at 280 nm and a solvent mixture of acetonitrile, acetic acid and
water in the ratio of 69:1:30 (v/v) with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The
chemical oxygen demand (COD) of samples was tested using a UV–vis
Hach DR6000 spectrophotometer. The Cl− ions left in the solution was
monitored using a Metrohm 792 Basic Ion Chromatography (IC)
coupled with a Metrosep C4 column. In order to ascertain the active spe-
cies that influence the 2,4-D degradation, 1 mM of capturing agents, in-
cluding isopropanol, benzoquinone, potassium iodide and catalase were
2.2. Synthesis of Au-BiFeO3 composites
In a typical synthesis of bare BiFeO3, 0.006 mol of Bi(NO3)3.5H2O,
0.006 mol of Fe(NO3)3.9H2O, 0.1 mol of urea and 2 mL of HNO3 were dis-
solved in deionzed water (20 mL) under stirring until completely dis-
solved. After that, the mixed solution was added in the KOH (10 M).
The mixture was then shifted into a Teflon-lined autoclave reactor and
heated at 125 °C for 15 h. After cooling down to room temperature,
the obtained product was centrifuged, washed with ethanol and deion-
ized water and dried in an oven at 80 °C.
The Au-BiFeO3 composites were prepared using a hydrothermal
technique in the presence of HAuCl4. In this experiment, a fixed amount
of HAuCl4 in methanol (40 mL) was sonicated in ultrasonication bath
(40 kHz/100 W) for 20 min. Subsequently, 1 g of BiFeO3 was inserted
in the solution and further sonicated for 30 min. After that, the solution
was moved into a Teflon-lined autoclave reactor and heated at 100 °C
for 4 h. The autoclave was then allowed to cool down naturally. The or-
ange precipitation of Au-BiFeO3 was collected by filtration, washed and
oven dried at 80 °C for overnight. A schematic diagram of Au-BiFeO3
composites synthesis using a two-steps hydrothermal technique is re-
vealed in Scheme 1.
adopted to scavenge hydroxyl (•OH) radical, superanion oxide (•O2−
)
radical, hole (h+) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), respectively. Addi-
tionally, electron spin resonance (ESR, Bruker EMX plus) with 5,5-di-
methyl-1-pyridine N-oxide (DMPO) as a quencher agent was used to
further confirm the •OH radical.
Recycling test of the Au-BiFeO3 composite was performed over six
cyclic runs. The Au-BiFeO3 composite in each run was centrifuged,
cleaned with deionized water and dried at 120 °C for 4 h. Afterwards,
the dried sample was again inserted in fresh 2,4-D solution for the
next run. The dissolved Fe3+ and Auo in the treated solution were
2