Kochany in the photolysis of 4-CP and 4-BP could be the
carbene 4-oxacyclohexa-2,5-dienylidene and that 1,4-benzo-
quinone O-oxide could be confused with a semiquinone species
when spin-trapped. Alternatively, the semiquinone anion
detected in the EPR experiments could result from secondary
photochemistry of the 1,4-benzoquinone photoproduct.
yield of 0.31 and a maximum of 0.85). A similar calculation
9 Ϫ1
for 4-CP yields a range of rate constants of 1.0–2.5 × 10 s .
The lack of fluorescence lifetime data for the bromo and iodo
compounds precludes analogous calculations for them but we
note that for 4-FP and 4-CP the increase in the S → T ISC
1
1
rate constant is considerably smaller than that calculated for
1-fluoro- and 1-chloro-naphthalene (where an increase of a
factor of 100 in this ISC rate constant is found) which form
part of the 1-fluoronaphthalene to 1-iodonaphthalene series
The nature of the excited state which leads to carbene 4
which is known to have a triplet ground state ) is open to
19
(
speculation. It is possible to envisage two main routes follow-
ing excitation of the ground state halogenophenol. These
differ depending on whether loss of HX takes place from the
halogenophenol triplet state following intersystem crossing
21
analysed by Birks. In this series, the heavy atom effect is rather
greater on the S → T1 ISC process than on that for
1
T → S . If the same is true in the case of the 4-halogeno-
1
0
(
ISC) or whether it takes place from the initially excited halo-
phenols, then reaction from the excited triplet state is again
precluded on the basis of our experimental data.
We therefore conclude that the mechanism for the formation
of carbene 4 in the photolysis of the 4-halogenophenols in
neutral aqueous solution is that given in Scheme 2. We have
genophenol singlet state and the singlet carbene thus produced
then intersystem crosses to its triplet ground state.
The evidence available to help differentiate between these
two possibilities consists of the effects of changing the halogen
atom and the effect of oxygen on the yield of carbene. We have
previously found that the yield of 4 in the photolysis of aqueous
1
*
OH
OH
OH
+
O
4
-CP is approximately the same in aerated and degassed
solution and is perhaps slightly higher in oxygen-saturated
hν
+
X–
11
solution. Since oxygen is a well-known triplet quencher these
observations would tend to imply that the chlorophenol triplet
state is not involved in the photochemical pathway to 4 and we
have not observed any transient which we can assign to a triplet
state of any of the four halogenophenols. However, oxygen is
not as soluble in water as in other solvents so that this, together
with a short-lived triplet state, could account for the similar
carbene yields in aerated, oxygenated and degassed water. The
effect of oxygen is inconclusive with respect to determining the
early mechanistic details.
X
X
OH
OH
X
+
+
X–
Changing the halogen atom in the halogenophenol will have
several effects. Firstly, the C᎐X bond strength decreases from
Scheme 2 Mechanism for the formation of 4-oxocyclohexa-2,5-
dienylidene in the photoreaction of the four halogenophenols in
aerated aqueous solution at ambient temperature
20
fluorine through to iodine making bond cleavage easier
and potentially increasing the yield of 4. Secondly, the heavy
atom effect will operate and catalyse any ISC processes in the
halogenophenols. If loss of HX occurs from the excited singlet
state, ISC will compete with this and we would anticipate
decreases in the fluorescence quantum yield and lifetime
and the yield of 4 (and subsequent photoproducts) as the
lighter halogens are replaced by the heavier. The effect of
the halogen substituent on the fluorescence properties of both
the 4-halogenophenols and the 4-halogenoanisoles, where the
quantum yield and lifetime decrease considerably as the atomic
weight of the halogen increases (Table 1) is clearly in accord
with the photoreaction originating in the excited singlet state.
In addition we note that the photoreaction quantum yield and
yield of 4 both decrease as the halogen substituent in the
attempted to prove this mechanism by investigating the effect of
an external heavy atom on the fluorescence properties and
nanosecond flash photolysis of the 4-halogenophenols. We are
not able to use bromide or iodide ions to undertake such
experiments since these two ions would interfere in the reaction
mechanism (see below), so we therefore chose ethyl iodide and
xenon as possible external heavy atom quenchers. Unfortu-
nately, both of these materials are insufficiently soluble in water
to produce a significant quenching effect due to the relatively
short singlet lifetimes of all four halogenophenols. In addition,
the absorption spectrum of ethyl iodide overlaps that of the
phenols. We have therefore been unable to validate our
proposed mechanism by using such experiments.
4
-halogenophenol is changed from fluorine to iodine. This is
The reaction quantum yields reported earlier represent a
minimum yield for the formation of the carbene since
recombination of the initial hydroxyphenyl cation–halide ion
pair may occur before the cation loses a proton to form the
carbene and Grabner et al. report a quantum yield for
the formation of 4 from 4-CP of 0.75. They also found that the
decay rate of the carbene was enhanced in the presence of
added halide ions with iodide ions being the most effective and
concluded that the halide ion added directly to the carbene; this
route would also decrease the yield of photodegradation if the
halide ion adding to the carbene was the same as that in the
original halogenophenol.
entirely consistent with reaction from the halogenophenol
excited singlet state competing with ISC.
If loss of HX occurs from the halogenophenol triplet state
the heavy atom effect would be expected to operate to enhance
both S → T and T → S ISC. The first of these processes
would again decrease the fluorescence yield and lifetime but
would now enhance the yield of 4 whereas the second ISC pro-
cess would act to decrease it. We were unable to detect a trans-
ient in our flash photolysis studies which could be attributed to
a triplet state and must therefore conclude that it is formed in
low yields or is short-lived (lifetime <100 ns) or both. This
means that we are unable to quantify the effect of the halogens
10
1
1
1
0
The initial heterolysis of the aryl–halogen bond has parallels
in the photochemistry of fluoromethoxybenzenes in aqueous
on the T → S0 ISC. However, if the photoreaction does
1
22
originate from the excited triplet state, our failure to detect it
due to its short lifetime leads to the conclusion that the heavy
atom effect on its lifetime will be small. The observed variation
in the photoreaction yields is not consistent with this scenario.
In addition, the photoreaction quantum yield of 0.31 for
solution reported by Zhang and Wan. Here HF was generated
by substitution of the fluoride by water with initial loss of
fluoride ion and the generation of an aryl cation. However it is
interesting to note that a chloromethoxybenzene was felt to
exhibit behaviour best explained by initial homolysis of the
aryl–halogen bond rather than the heterolytic behaviour seen
here for 4-CP and the other halogenophenols. It would be inter-
esting to undertake faster flash experiments to try to observe
4
-FP indicates that if reaction occurs from the triplet state,
S → T ISC is already efficient and has a rate constant of ca.
1
1
1
8
Ϫ1
.5–4.0 × 10 s (based on a minimum intersystem crossing
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1998
369