COMPETING ORGANIC PERACID OXIDATION MECHANISMS
meta-chloro benzoic acid, that is the reduction product from
mCPBA, precipitate during the cooling of the post-reaction mix-
ture, which further simplified the work-up procedure.
The acid catalyst resin was easily recycled by filtering off from
the warm post-reaction mixture. The isolated resin was washed
with acetonitrile and re-used without further purification, regen-
eration procedures or addition of more fresh resin. We repeated
the reaction five times (that is four recycles of the resin). The
achieved results showed only a small variance providing a yield
of desired product in the range 65-69%, see Fig. 4.
ring drives the oxidation towards the most activated carbocyclic
carbon. When there is the concomitant activating effect of the
two groups in the meta position to each other, the oxidation
shows high selectivity on the respective activated carbocyclic
carbon, achieving mostly the corresponding phenol or Baeyer–
Villiger product. Nevertheless, by means of a fine-tuning of the
experimental variables, we are able to maximize the yields of
the corresponding phenol or Baeyer–Villiger products when
the two mechanisms are in a competition.
CONCLUSIONS
The influence of the substitution pattern
We have investigated the selectivity of the peracid oxidation of
substituted acetophenones. Depending on the nature of the
substituents of the acetophenone, the direct aromatic ring
hydroxylation can compete with the Baeyer–Villiger oxygen
insertion. By means of multivariate modelling of designed expe-
riments with 2,6-dimethoxy-acetophenone as model substrate,
we could establish predictive empirical models from which it
was possible to device the favoured oxidation pathway by fine-
tuning the settings of the various experimental variables. Then,
the protocol that provided the highest yield of the correspond-
ing phenol was used to investigate a library of various
acetophenones with the goal to explore the electronic effect of
the substituents depending on their relative positions on the ar-
omatic ring. We revealed that both the molecular structure of the
substrate and the experimental conditions demonstrated a con-
siderable impact on whether the oxidation reaction follows the
oxygen insertion or the direct ring hydroxylation mechanism,
particularly the synergic activation by strong electron donating
group can drive the selectivity of oxygen attack. Besides reveal-
ing the various mechanistic issues, we revealed an improved
protocol for the direct aromatic ring hydroxylation.
The kinetics of the Baeyer–Villiger oxidation of acetophenones
[
28]
has previously been studied.
Studies have shown that elec-
tron donating groups in conjugated positions have two contra-
dictory effects on the reaction rate. Because of the activating
effect, the lower electrophilicity of the carbonyl group ought to
lower the reaction rate, but the activation results in an increased
basicity of the carbonyl oxygen, which once protonated in-
creases the electrophilicity of the carbonyl carbon promoting
the peracid addition. This second effect slightly prevails and
[
29]
speeds up the overall mechanism.
A question which then
arises is the following: what happens when there are more sub-
stituents on the aromatic ring and how varies the selectivity rel-
ative to the various groups position? We have tried to shed some
light on this issue by exploring the electronic effects of the sub-
stituents by treating series of acetophenones 11–25 of Table 3,
using the optimized oxidation protocol (as developed with
acetophenone 7 using Amberlite IR 120 as the acid catalyst).
The three deactivated acetophenones 12–14 were not oxi-
dized using the conditions developed herein. Acetophenone
11 and acetonaphthone 23 provided, as expected, only small
quantities of the Baeyer–Villiger product. The phenolic derivative
p-hydroxyacetophenone 17 and 22 showed different selectivity:
the first one was completely converted to the corresponding
benzoquinone 17a, whereas the second one provided only the
corresponding Baeyer–Villiger derivative. We believe that in the
case of the acetophenone 17, the formation of the quinone
could be ascribed to a fast oxidation by mCPBA of the acetic es-
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Acknowledgements
[11]
ter intermediates.
Economic support from the Department of Chemistry at
University of Bergen and the Department of Chemistry,
Materials and Chemical Engineering at Politecnico di Milano
are gratefully acknowledged. H.R.B. acknowledges the Faculty
of Mathematics and Natural Sciences at University of Bergen
for funding to a sabbatical leave in 2013 where the project
disclosed herein was completed.
The activated acetyl position of 2,4-dimethoxyacetophenone
9 directed the reaction versus a Baeyer–Villiger mechanism;
1
however, the activating effect of the methoxy groups in posi-
tions 2 and 4 towards the carbocyclic atom in the 4-position
made the reaction product reactive, and small amounts of the
corresponding hydroxylated product were recovered. The con-
comitant electro donating effect on the same carbon atom is
not present in 2,5-dimethoxy acetophenone 24 and 3,4-methy-
lene-dioxyaceto-phenone 25, which only provided the Baeyer–
Villiger oxidation product. On the other hand, because of the
strong activation of the aromatic carbon, 3,4,5-trimethoxy-
acetophenone 18 and 3,5-dimethoxy-acetophenone 20 pro-
vided the corresponding phenols as the major products, which
is similar to the results obtained with our model substrate 2,6-
dimethoxy-acetophenone 7. The model interpretation from the
previous discussion taken together with the results achieved
during the scope of the reaction investigation, it comes clear that
the Baeyer–Villiger and direct ring hydroxylation mechanisms
can compete depending both on the experimental conditions
and on the effects of the aromatic ring substituents. It is evident
that the presence of electron donating groups on the aromatic
REFERENCES
[
1] H. Fiege1, H.-W. Voges, T. Hamamoto, S. Umemura, T. Iwata, H. Miki, Y.
Fujita, H.-J. Buysch, D. Garbe, W. Paulus, Phenol Derivatives, Ullmann’s
Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Wiley, 2014.
[
2] Phenolic Compound Biochemistry (Eds: W. Vermerris, R. Nicholson),
Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006.
[
3] Encyclopedia of Agrochemicals (Eds: J. R. Plimmer), Wiley, Hoboken,
New Jersey, USA, 2002.
[4] Flavourings (Eds: H. Ziegler), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2007.
[5] a)The chemistry of phenols, Patai Series: The Chemistry of Functional
Groups (Eds: Z. Rappoport), Wiley, Chichester, England, 2003.
b) P. W. Kopf, Phenolic Resins, Encyclopedia of Polymer Science
and Technology, Wiley, Weinheim, 2002.
[
6] Handbook of Antioxidants (Eds: E. Cadenas L. Packe), Marcel Dekker,
Taylor & Francis, New York, USA, 2002.
J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2015, 28 619–628
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/poc