116
T.D. Turbeville et al. / Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 511 (2011) 107–117
two functional domains to avoid intermolecular strain and prevent
unwanted interactions between the two modules [47,48,50–52].
Because our objective was to facilitate interaction between the
subunits of ALAS/ALAS and the AONS and ALAS chimeras, only
two amino acids (Glu-Leu), which were introduced with the con-
struction of a restriction site between the cDNAs, link the two sub-
units. Like both ALAS single-chain dimeric variants, the linking of
the ALAS and AONS subunits appeared to change the energy barrier
associated with the structural rearrangement that occurs upon ALA
formation to allow product release. It is likely that the use of the
short dipeptide to link the ALAS C-terminus with the N-terminus
of either ALAS or AONS introduced intermolecular strain which al-
tered conformational flexibility.
Remarkably, the strain introduced with the short linker did not
significantly impair the catalytic efficiencies in any of the fusion
proteins. In fact, the catalytic efficiency for succinyl-CoA increased
roughly 15- and 30-fold in ALASK313A/ALAS and ALAS/ALAS, respec-
tively (Table 3). The short linker also appears to have altered the
intermolecular dynamics and caused different extent of the active
site loop motion at the two sites. While the loop motion and prod-
uct release were greatly facilitated at one site, they were hindered
at the other. However, since the degree of enhancement at one site
was greater than the degree of hindrance at the other site, the
resulting linked chain dimer (ALAS/ALAS) possessed greater en-
zyme activity than the ‘‘natural’’ wild-type homodimer (ALAS).
Generally, efforts are made to avoid the introduction of strain
when engineering hybrid proteins; however, with the increased
use of high-throughput protein engineering, the introduction of
intermolecular strain through linker domains may be a reasonable
approach to creating new proteins with enhanced or novel func-
tions. This might be particularly important if one takes into ac-
count that recruitment of domains and subunits, with alteration
of domain architecture and oligomeric state, seems to represent
one mechanism of how proteins evolve to acquire distinct func-
tions with a limited number of scaffolds [43]. Oligomerization
and domain fusion appeared to be a strategy adopted by transfer-
ases to shield hydrophilic ligands, contrasting to their homologous,
and perhaps parent, hydrolases, in which the ligand molecules are
exposed to water [43].
and Dr. Charlotte S. Russell (City University of New York) for the
E. coli HU227 strain. We also thank Ms. Michelle Grigsby for her
technical assistance in the construction of some of the expression
plasmids and purification of some batches of ALAS/ALAS.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References
[1] P. Christen, P.K. Mehta, Chem. Rec. 1 (2001) 436–447.
[2] A.C. Eliot, J.F. Kirsch, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73 (2004) 383–415.
[3] G.C. Ferreira, J. Gong, J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 27 (1995) 151–159.
[4] G.A. Hunter, G.C. Ferreira, Biochim. Biophys. Acta (2011) [Epub ahead of print]
PMID: 21215825.
[5] G. Layer, J. Reichelt, D. Jahn, D.W. Heinz, Protein Sci. 19 (2010) 1137–1161.
[6] G. Schneider, H. Kack, Y. Lindqvist, Structure 8 (2000) R1–R6.
[7] B.A. Yard, L.G. Carter, K.A. Johnson, I.M. Overton, M. Dorward, H. Liu, S.A.
McMahon, M. Oke, D. Puech, G.J. Barton, J.H. Naismith, D.J. Campopiano, J. Mol.
Biol. 370 (2007) 870–886.
[8] I. Astner, J.O. Schulze, J. van den Heuvel, D. Jahn, W.D. Schubert, D.W. Heinz,
EMBO J. 24 (2005) 3166–3177.
[9] A. Schmidt, J. Sivaraman, Y. Li, R. Larocque, J.A. Barbosa, C. Smith, A. Matte, J.D.
Schrag, M. Cygler, Biochemistry 40 (2001) 5151–5160.
[10] D. Alexeev, M. Alexeeva, R.L. Baxter, D.J. Campopiano, S.P. Webster, L. Sawyer, J.
Mol. Biol. 284 (1998) 401–419.
[11] M.C.C. Raman, K.A. Johnson, B.A. Yard, J. Lowther, L.G. Carter, J.H. Naismith, D.J.
Campopiano, J. Biol. Chem. 284 (2009) 17328–17339.
[12] H. Ikushiro, S. Fujii, Y. Shiraiwa, H. Hayashi, J. Biol. Chem. 283 (2008) 7542–
7553.
[13] H. Ikushiro, M.M. Islam, A. Okamoto, J. Hoseki, T. Murakawa, S. Fujii, I.
Miyahara, H. Hayashi, J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 146 (2009) 549–562.
[14] N. Jahan, J.A. Potter, M.A. Sheikh, C.H. Botting, S.L. Shirran, N.J. Westwood, G.L.
Taylor, J. Mol. Biol. 392 (2009) 763–773.
[15] T. Spirig, A. Tiaden, P. Kiefer, C. Buchrieser, J.A. Vorholt, H. Hilbi, J. Biol. Chem.
283 (2008) 18113–18123.
[16] A. Tiaden, T. Spirig, P. Carranza, H. Bruggemann, K. Riedel, L. Eberl, C.
Buchrieser, H. Hilbi, J. Bacteriol. 190 (2008) 7532–7547.
[17] A. Tiaden, T. Spirig, H. Hilbi, Trends Microbiol. 18 (2010) 288–297.
[18] D. Tan, G.C. Ferreira, Biochemistry 35 (1996) 8934–8941.
[19] O. Ploux, A. Marquet, Biochem. J. 283 (Pt 2) (1992) 327–331.
[20] G.C. Ferreira, P.J. Neame, H.A. Dailey, Protein Sci. 2 (1993) 1959–1965.
[21] A.V. Cheltsov, M.J. Barber, G.C. Ferreira, J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 19141–
19149.
[22] A.V. Cheltsov, W.C. Guida, G.C. Ferreira, J. Biol. Chem. 278 (2003) 27945–
27955.
[23] J. Zhang, A.V. Cheltsov, G.C. Ferreira, Protein Sci. 14 (2005) 1190–1200.
[24] G. Han, K. Gable, L. Yan, M.J. Allen, W.H. Wilson, P. Moitra, J.M. Harmon, T.M.
Dunn, J. Biol. Chem. 281 (2006) 39935–39942.
[25] G. Han, S.D. Gupta, K. Gable, S. Niranjanakumari, P. Moitra, F. Eichler, R.H.
Brown, J.M. Harmon, T.M. Dunn, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 (2009) 8186–
8191.
[26] G.C. Ferreira, H.A. Dailey, J. Biol. Chem. 268 (1993) 584–590.
[27] G.C. Ferreira, U. Vajapey, O. Hafez, G.A. Hunter, M.J. Barber, Protein Sci. 4
(1995) 1001–1006.
[28] J. Gong, G.A. Hunter, G.C. Ferreira, Biochemistry 37 (1998) 3509–3517.
[29] S.P. Webster, D. Alexeev, D.J. Campopiano, R.M. Watt, M. Alexeeva, L. Sawyer,
R.L. Baxter, Biochemistry 39 (2000) 516–528.
[30] P.K. Smith, R.I. Krohn, G.T. Hermanson, A.K. Mallia, F.H. Gartner, M.D.
Provenzano, E.K. Fujimoto, N.M. Goeke, B.J. Olson, D.C. Klenk, Anal. Biochem.
150 (1985) 76–85.
In summary, we constructed a dimeric enzyme from a single
polypeptide chain such that each active site could be studied inde-
pendently. We have shown that the two active sites in the ALAS/
ALAS single-chain dimer make asymmetrical steady-state contri-
butions to the activity of the enzyme. This and the reduced stea-
dy-state activity of the single-chain chimeras of ALAS and AONS
relative to the parent enzymes are likely to be caused by differ-
ences in conformational changes at product release, which in turn
are due to the strain introduced by joining the two subunits with-
out a linker region. Although the chimeric ALAS/AONS and AONS/
ALAS proteins did not form hybrid active sites, they were able to
form dimers with separate regions of ALAS and AONS activity.
Thus, the extensive structural plasticity seen in ALAS extends to
[31] G.A. Hunter, G.C. Ferreira, Anal. Biochem. 226 (1995) 221–224.
[32] S.P. Webster, D.J. Campopiano, D. Alexeev, M. Alexeeva, R.M. Watt, L. Sawyer,
R.L. Baxter, Biochem. Soc. Trans. 26 (1998) S268.
[33] J. Zhang, G.C. Ferreira, J. Biol. Chem. 277 (2002) 44660–44669.
[34] K.A. Johnson, Enzymes XX (1992) 1–61.
another member of the a-oxoamine family, AONS, and other inter-
actions in addition to those at the active site contribute to the rec-
ognition for the dimer interface of a specific enzyme.
[35] J.M. Li, O. Brathwaite, S.D. Cosloy, C.S. Russell, J. Bacteriol. 171 (1989) 2547–
2552.
Funding
[36] J. Gong, G.C. Ferreira, Biochemistry 34 (1995) 1678–1685.
[37] G.A. Hunter, G.C. Ferreira, Biochemistry 38 (1999) 12526–12531.
[38] G.A. Hunter, J. Zhang, G.C. Ferreira, J. Biol. Chem. 282 (2007) 23025–23035.
[39] A. Sasarman, M. Surdeanu, T. Horodniceanu, J. Bacteriol. 96 (1968) 1882–1884.
[40] A. Del Campillo-Campbell, G. Kayajanian, A. Campbell, S. Adhya, J. Bacteriol. 94
(1967) 2065–2066.
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health,
USA (Grants # DK63191 and # GM080270 to G.C.F.).
[41] T. Lendrihas, G.A. Hunter, G.C. Ferreira, J. Biol. Chem. 285 (2010) 13704–13711.
[42] J. Stetefeld, M. Jenny, P. Burkhard, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 (2006) 13688–
13693.
Acknowledgments
[43] H. Kirsten, H. Gehring, P. Christen, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80 (1983) 1807–
1810.
We thank Dr. Dominic Campopiano (University of Edinburgh)
for providing the Escherichia coli R872 strain and pET6HAONS
[44] J.J. Onuffer, J.F. Kirsch, Protein Eng. 7 (1994) 413–424.