CHEMCATCHEM
COMMUNICATIONS
Structural characterization of the catalyst used in metathesis
(Figure 2) indicated that the M1 phase preserved its bulk struc-
ture but that it did undergo a minor modification that was
much less severe than the reduction of M1 in propane at
673 K.[10] No essential change was observed in the XRD pattern
after the propene reaction (Figure 4a), and this indicates that
the bulk structure of the M1 phase was preserved. A whole
erate under alkane oxidation conditions (T=613–693 K),[2] al-
though the degree of reduction of the M1 surface is very likely
lower than that of the present test conditions and, thus, lower
olefin isomerization activity is expected. The propene con-
sumption rate reached 130–85 mmolmÀ2 hÀ1 at 573 K, which is
comparable to typical propene formation rates in propane oxi-
dation over MoVTeNbO catalysts (e.g., 280 mmolmÀ2 hÀ1 at
653 K[5]). Accordingly, a minor amount of olefin isomerization
under the oxidation conditions seems plausible. Indeed, we
observed the formation of ethene and isobutene as minor
products under the propane oxidation conditions.[10] It is
speculated that the major fraction of the C4 olefins formed by
the metathesis route under the propane oxidation conditions
undergoes further oxidation to yield stable end products (e.g.,
CO2, methacrylic acid, maleic anhydride). Though it is not clear
how significant olefin isomerization is under propane oxidation
conditions, the present findings provide new insight into the
complex reaction network of propane oxidation over MoVTe-
NbO M1 catalysts and the versatility of the M1 phase in cataly-
sis.
In summary, we discovered propene metathesis and isomeri-
zation catalysis over the MoVTeNbO M1 catalyst to yield
ethene and butenes. It appears that the reduction of the M1
surface triggers the catalyst’s activity for metathesis and the
isomerization of olefins. The findings highlight the highly mul-
tifunctional nature of M1 and reveal the prominent role of dy-
namic changes in the surface of the catalyst under the reaction
conditions.
Experimental Section
Figure 4. Characterization of MoVTeNbO M1 before and after the propene
reaction. a) XRD patterns (the inset shows a magnification); b) Raman spec-
tra upon excitation at l=633 nm.
The phase-pure MoVTeNbO M1 catalyst (SBET =7.5 m2 gÀ1, internal
ID# 6902) was synthesized by spray drying and subsequent purifi-
cation. Details of the synthesis and characterization are reported
elsewhere.[5] Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed
by using a STOE STADI-P transmission diffractometer equipped
with CuKa1 radiation. Confocal Raman spectra were collected at
room temperature by using a Horiba–Jobin Ybon LabRam instru-
ment equipped with red laser excitation (633 nm/1.96 eV, 1.5 mW
at the sample position). Propene conversion activity was tested in
a fixed-bed reactor at 323–573 K at a contact time of 0.15 sgmLÀ1
by using thoroughly dehydrated and deoxygenated neat propene
at atmospheric pressure. Inlet and outlet gases were analyzed by
an online gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization de-
tector. The activity is presented as the formation rates of the prod-
ucts normalized by the specific BET surface area of the catalyst. Se-
lectivity was calculated on the basis of the number of carbon
atoms in the products. Temperature-programmed reaction with
propene was performed with a fixed-bed reactor equipped with
a quadrupole mass spectrometer by using 5% propene in helium
powder pattern fitting indicates a very minor but notable
change in the lattice parameters of the a and b axes, which is
reflected in the shift of the (600) reflection at 2q=25–268 (Fig-
ure 4a, inset). The minor change in the lattice parameters is in-
dicative of the reduction of the M1 phase.[10] In agreement
with the XRD results, after the propene reaction the Raman
spectrum kept the general features of M1 but lost distinct
bands at n˜ =875 (MÀO stretching) and 450 cmÀ1. These two
Raman bands were identified as indicators of the high crystal-
linity of the M1 phase, as the bands occurred upon annealing
nanocrystalline M1 into microcrystalline M1 at elevated tem-
peratures.[23] Besides, no sign of coke deposition[24] at n˜ =
1300–1800 cmÀ1 was observed in the Raman analysis. Summa-
rizing the structural analyses, it is suggested that the M1 cata-
lyst underwent partial reduction of the M1 phase that involved
cleavage of the MÀO bonds, whereas the bulk crystal structure
was preserved. The preservation of the M1 bulk phase is likely
important for catalysis, because crystalline MoO3 showed no
propene conversion activity even after reductive pretreatment
by hydrogen or propene (data not shown).
at a heating rate of 2 KminÀ1
.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Frank Girgsdies and Jasmin Allan for XRD experi-
ments and Dr. Raoul Naumann d’Alnoncourt for discussions. K.A.
is grateful to Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Co., Inc. for a fellowship.
Considering the significant activity observed at low tempera-
ture (i.e., T=423–573 K), olefin isomerization catalysis may op-
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ChemCatChem 0000, 00, 1 – 4
&
3
&
ÞÞ
These are not the final page numbers!