10.1002/cctc.201800650
ChemCatChem
COMMUNICATION
continuously over time, while the selectivity of trans- and cis-2-
butene increased over time (figure S4a), indicating that the
generated 1-butene product oligomer might be undergoing
isomerization. Ni(6.85wt%)-ETS-10 also showed the lowest C6
selectivity over the entire period of 6 hours (figure S5). Overall,
the above observations indicate that Ni(6.85wt%)-ETS-10 is a
stable catalyst for ethylene oligomerization to C4 and that Ni-
ETS-10 is a promising catalyst for ethylene oligomerization.
Packed-bed reactor with online gas chromatograph
A packed-bed reactor was used for testing the catalysts for ethylene
oligomerization reaction in an isothermal, continuous gas flow mode. 50
mg of catalyst was diluted with pre-calcined (1000oC, 24h) 13.5g silica
gel in order to eliminate local hot-spots and temperature gradients across
catalyst bed during reaction. Heated flow lines (170oC) were used to
eliminate condensation of large oligomeric reaction products.
Catalysts were treated in-situ in helium flow at 180oC for 16 hours before
performing the reactions. (ETS-10 catalysts were additionally pretreated
in-situ under dynamic vacuum (2 mmHg absolute) for 12 hours at 450oC
before helium treatment.) The reactions were carried out at 180oC, 5atm
ethylene pressure and 90 gC2/(gcatalysth) space velocity (conversion <1%
for all catalysts, figure S6). Rates and selectivities were quantified
continuously using an online gas chromatograph.
In conclusion, we exploited the ion-exchange capability of ETS-
10 for catalytic reactions, where Ni2+ was exchanged into ETS-
10for ethylene oligomerization. The Ni-ETS-10 catalyst was
active for ethylene oligomerization, which shows higher rate
(based on total Ni) than other microporous catalysts. Ni-ETS-10
also showed highest selectivity to C4 and higher stability than
other microporous catalysts investigated in this work.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the financial support from the
Department of Chemical Engineering and the Institute for
Natural Gas Research (INGaR) at the Pennsylvania State
University. X.Z. acknowledges financial support from the John J.
and Jean M. Brennan Clean Energy Early Career Professorship.
Materials characterization was performed at the Materials
Characterization Laboratory, which is a partner in the National
Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN) and the
Materials Research Facilities Network (MRFN), supported by the
U.S. National Science Foundation (award DMR-1420620). A U.S.
patent application by X.Z. and J.T. was filed on March 5, 2018
(Application No. 62/638,366).
Experimental Section
Catalyst synthesis and characterization
Microporous nanoparticle ETS-10 was synthesized using conventional
hydrothermal method based on a previous report.[28] NaOH (EMD Millipore),
KOH (EMD Millipore), TiO2 (P25, Acros Organics), sodium silicate solution
(EMD Millipore), and 37wt%HCl aqueous solution (Sigma-Aldrich) were used
without further purification. DI water (resistivity=18.2 m) was used in the
synthesis and subsequent washing of the final products. The NaOH, KOH,
sodium silicate solution, and P25 were sequentially added into DI water at
ambient temperature, into which HCl solution was added dropwise while
stirring at 500 rpm. A thick gel was formed at the end of the addition of HCl
solution. The following molar ratio of the components, 3.4Na2O: 1.5K2O:
1TiO2: 5.5SiO2: xHCl: (116.7+3.45x) H2O (x=6.6-8.1) was achieved in the end.
The gel was then heated in a convection oven at 230oC for 72 hours. The
product was washed with DI water until the pH of the supernatant is 9-10.
Micron-sized ETS-10 particles were synthesized according to the synthesis
method based on a previous report (SEM images in figure S2b).[32,33]
Keywords: catalysts • ETS10 • ethylene • heterogeneous •
oligomerization
[1]
[2]
M. Sanati, C. Hörnell, S. G. Järas, Catalysis, 1999, 14, 236–287
Z. Xu, J. P. Chada, L. Xu, D. Zhao, D. C. Rosenfeld, J. L. Rogers, I,
Hermans, M. Mavrikakis, G. W. Huber, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 2488-2497
J. R. Sohn, D. C. Shin, H. W. Kim, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2007, 13, 1, 47-
56
In order to exchange the Na+, K+ ions present in the microporous ETS-10
with Ni2+ ions, the as-synthesized ETS-10 was stirred in a 0.25 mol/L
Ni(NO3)2 aqueous solution for 18 hours at ambient temperature (or for 3
hours at 80oC twice for higher Ni2+ loading), washed with DI water and
calcined at 500oC for 5hrs.
[3]
[4]
A. V. Lavrenov, E. A. Buluchevskii, M. A. Moiseenko, V. A. Drozdov, A.
B. Arbuzov, T. I. Gulyaeva, V. A. Likholobov, V. K. Duplyakin,
KinetCatal., 2010, 51, 3, 404-409
[5]
[6]
J. R. Sohn, W. C. Park, S. Park, Catal. Lett., 2002, 81, 3-4, 259-264
A. Corma, S. Iborra, Chapter 6, Oligomerization of Alkenes, Catalysts
for Fine Chemical Synthesis, Vol. 4, Microporous and Mesoporous
Solid Catalysts (Eds.: E. Derouane), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2006
O. Muraza, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2015, 54, 781−789
Other catalysts, Ni-CIT-6, and Ni-MOF-74, were also used in order to
compare the catalytic outcomes from Ni-ETS-10. Ni-CIT-6[30] and Ni-
MOF-74[31] were synthesized and pretreated using previous reported
methods. XRD patterns in figure S3 show the crystallinity of the Ni-CIT-6
and the Ni-MOF-74 synthesized and used in this study. SEM images of
the Ni-CIT-6 particles and the Ni-MOF-74 are shown in figure S2c and
figure S2d, respectively.
[7]
[8]
[9]
A. Finiels, F. Fajula, V. Hulea, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 2412–2426
J. Heveling, A. V. D. Beek, M. Pender, Appl. Catal.,1988, 42, 325-336
[10] L. Bonneviot, D. Olivier, M. Che, J. Mol. Catal., 1983, 21, 415 - 430
[11] A. Martinez, M. A. Arribas, P.Concepcion, S. Moussa, Appl. Catal. A,
2013, 467, 509–518
Catalyst Characterization
[12] M. Lallemand, A. Finiels, F. Fajula, V. Hulea, Appl. Catal. A, 2006, 301,
196–201
Powder XRD patterns were obtained using PANalytical Empreyean
diffractometer (40mA, 45kV), Cu Kα radiation (λ=1.54Å). TEM, STEM,
and STEM-EDS micrographs were collected on an FEI Talos F200X at
200kV. Bruker Esprit software was used to collect the element maps.
SEM images of the synthesized ETS-10 catalyst were taken using FEI
[13] R. Y. Brogaard, U. Olsbye, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 2, 1205–1214
[14] M. Tanaka, A. Itadani, Y. Kuroda, M. Iwamoto, J. Phys. Chem.
C, 2012, 116, 9, 5664–5672
[15] A. Hwang, S. Kim, G. Kwak, S. K. Kim, H. Park, S. C. Kang, K. Jun, Y.
T. Kim, Catal Lett., 2017, 147, 6, 1303-1314
Helios NanoLab 660 FESEM and Thermo Fisher Scios
2 at 2kV.
Elemental analysis (ICP) was performed by Galbraith Laboratories, Inc.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.