Dendrimer-Like Polymers and Asymmetric/Miktoarm Stars
A R T I C L E S
In that work, these authors elaborated a new concept for the
functionalization/derivatization of growing arms. Named TER-
MINI for irreversible TERmination Multifunctional INItiator,
a specific molecule was designed by Percec and co-workers that
could interrupt the growth of “living” radical species and
generate at the same time a branching point and twice as many
initiating sites for the growth of the next generation. From
calixarenes of various functionalities (4, 6, and 8) that were
derivatized to accommodate ATRP sites, our team derived
dendrimer-like polystyrenes of the third generation by resorting
to the same iterative divergent method based on generation
growth and chain end derivatization.10 In the same vein,
amphiphilic dendrimer-like copolymers including polystyrene
(PS) and poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) generations (PSn-b-PAA2n
and PAAn-b-PS2n) were obtained by us.11 One of the difficulties
encountered while applying this divergent strategy to active
species such those of ATRP is the risk of spoiling the
architecture formed due to inevitable termination reactions:
when growing arms outward from a core, the probability of
dendrimer-dendrimer coupling is not negligible and our at-
tempts to prepare dendrimer-like polystyrene of a generation
higher than three all failed.10
This prompted us to turn toward chemistries and chain
polymerizations that are defect-free and truly “living” to
construct dendrimer-like polymers of high generation from
regular monomers such as styrene, dienes, or methacrylates.
From that standpoint anionic polymerization fulfills ideally all
the criteria of livingness and is certainly the most appropriate
chain polymerization for monomers such as those mentioned
above. However, due to the difficulty to generate pluricarban-
ionic initiators suitable for the latter monomers, and more
generally soluble species that carry a precise number of
carbanions, anionic polymerization has essentially been utilized
in a convergent manner in macromolecular engineering. Unlike
the divergent approach, the convergent synthesis entails the
coupling of “living” linear chains with multifunctional deacti-
vating agents. Dendrimer-like polymers resulting from the
convergent approach have been obtained by iteration of the two
steps of linear chain growth followed by their deactivation on
the antagonist sites of the previous generation. Knauss,12-14
Hadjichristidis,15,16 and Hirao17,18 applied this strategy of
convergent deactivation of “living” carbanionic chains, using
either chlorosilane containing electrophilic reagents or diphe-
nylethylene derivatives including masked electrophilic benzyl
bromide functions. Knauss and Hadjichristidis limited the
synthesis of their dendrimer-like samples to small generations,
but Hirao and co-workers succeeded in obtaining well-defined
polymethacrylate dendritic samples up to the seventh generation.
As multifunctional electrophilic deactivating reagents are
easier to generate and handle than multicarbanionic initiators,
as illustrated in the examples cited above, anionic polymerization
was long thought as only suitable for the convergent methodol-
ogy in the synthesis of stars and dendrimer-like polymers.
Indeed, even regular, miktoarm, and asymmetric stars have been
obtained by this deactivating convergent approach.19-23
The necessity in the latter approach to use a large excess of
“living” linear chains for a complete coupling with the elec-
trophilic moieties and thus the need to carefully fractionate the
architecture formed from the precursor is a tedious and
painstaking work that incited us to investigate an original
divergent anionic route of dendrimer synthesis. The strategy of
synthesis reported here capitalizes on a chemistry that we
recently disclosed and exploited to design perfectly defined di-
and pluricarbanionic initiators soluble in apolar media.24,25 This
chemistry is based on lithium-halide exchange reactions with
pluribromoaryls as precursors and BuLi as a lithium source.
After the first step which corresponds to the synthesis of “living”
stars including a precise number of arms, the construction of
dendrimer-like architectures requires the introduction of branch-
ing points at the end of the first generation and twice as many
active initiating sites for the next generation to grow. Inspired
by Percec’s TERMINI concept, we thus designed and report
here a compound that can interrupt the growth of “living”
carbanionic chains and concomitantly introduce at their end two
initiating sites that can get activated by lithium-halide reactions.
This report actually describes a novel method of generating on
a single (macro)molecule carbanionic species in a high and yet
precise number through an anionic TERMINI. Combining a
pluricarbanionic initiator with such an anionic TERMINI agent,
repeatedly used generation after generation, affords well-defined
dendrimer-like samples as it will be shown subsequently. The
living character of the anionic polymerization of styrene and
butadiene was undoubtedly an asset that helped us to obtain
dendrimer-like PS of the seventh generation and polybutadiene
of the third generation.
Prior to the synthesis of these dendrimer-like samples, the
TERMINI concept was tested through the synthesis of asym-
metric stars and miktoarm stars by combining the TERMINI
developed in this work with “living” linear carbanionic chains.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Introduction of a Branching Point at the Chain End
of Linear Carbanionic Polymers by the Means of a TER-
MINI. 4,4′-Dibromodiphenylethylene (1) is the anionic TER-
MINI designed to deactivate and functionalize “living” carban-
ionic chains. It contains a bromide in the para position of its
two phenyl rings to allow subsequently an easy lithium-
bromide exchange after its incorporation at the chain ends. The
(19) Hadjichristidis, N.; Pitsikalis, M.; Pispas, S.; Iatrou, H. Chem. ReV. 2001,
101, 3747.
(20) Hsieh, H. L.; Quirk, R. P. Anionic Polymerization. Principle and Practical
Applications; Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, 1996.
(21) Quirk, R. P.; Yoo, T.; Lee, Y.; Kim, J.; Lee, B. AdV. Polym. Sci. 2000,
153, 67.
(22) Quirk, R. P.; Lee, B.; Schock, L. E. Makromol. Chem., Macromol. Symp.
1992, 53, 201.
(23) Quirk, R. P.; Yoo, T. Polym. Bull. 1993, 31, 29.
(24) Matmour, R.; More, A. S.; Wadgaonkar, P. P.; Gnanou, Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 8158.
(25) Matmour, R.; Lebreton, A.; Tsitsilianis, C.; Kallitsis, I.; He´roguez, V.;
Gnanou, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 284.
(26) Suffert, J. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 509.
(10) Lepoittevin, B.; Matmour, R.; Francis, R.; Taton, D.; Gnanou, Y.
Macromolecules 2005, 38, 3120.
(11) Matmour, R.; Lepoittevin, B.; Joncheray, T. J.; El-khouri, R. J.; Taton, D.;
Duran, R. S.; Gnanou, Y. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 5459.
(12) Knauss, D. M.; Al-Muallem, H. A.; Huang, T.; Wu, D. T. Macromolecules
2000, 33, 3557.
(13) Knauss, D. M.; Al-Muallem, H. A. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem.
2000, 38, 4289.
(14) Knauss, D. M.; Huang, T. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 6036.
(15) Chalari, I.; Hadjichristidis, N. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2002,
40, 1519.
(16) Orfanou, K.; Iatrou, H.; Lohse, D. J.; Hadjichristidis, N. Macromolecules
2006, 39, 4361.
(17) Matsuo, A.; Watanabe, T.; Hirao, A. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 6283.
(18) Hirao, A.; Matsuo, A.; Watanabe, T. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 8701.
(27) Francis, R.; Taton, D.; Logan, J.; Masse´, P.; Duran, R. S.; Gnanou, Y.
Macromolecules 2003, 36, 8253.
(28) Wolfe, J. F.; Arnold, F. E. Macromolecules 1981, 14, 909.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 4, 2008 1351