(
1
CDCl
5.8, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.63 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (d, J = 5.5
Hz, 1H), 7.46 (dt, J = 8.4, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H),
3
) 8.99 (s, 1H), 8.70 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (dd, J =
0.36 mmol) in absolute methanol (final reaction volume = 3 mL).
The reaction mixture was purified by chromatography on silica
gel (5% methanol in ethyl acetate) to give the desired product as
1
7
.00 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 3.94 (s, 3H).
a yellow solid (67 mg, 57%). H-NMR (CDCl
3
) 8.50 (s, 1H),
13
C-NMR (CDCl
3
) 191.2, 158.5, 151.4, 150.7, 149.4, 136.1,
8.40 (d, J = 4.3 Hz, 1H), 7.89 (dd, J = 15.8, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (d,
J – 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.72 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H),
7.52 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (d, J = 15.8
1
5
3
34.2, 133.9, 132.4, 130.9, 129.1, 128.2, 121.7, 119.5, 111.6,
12 3 2
5.6. HRMS (FAB): calc’d C16H F NO + H = 308.0898, found
08.0900.
1
3
Hz, 1H), 3.98 (s, 3H). C-NMR (CDCl
1
1
3
) 191.8, 152.5, 143.0,
40.9, 135.1, 134.6, 133.4, 132.2, 130.0, 129.8, 129.4, 129.1,
2
26.4, 125.2, 122.6, 55.4. HRMS (FAB): calc’d C16 NO +
4
.1.4
(E)-1-(2-Methoxyphenyl)-3-(3-(trifluoromethyl)-
12
H F
3
pyridin-2-yl)prop-2-en-1-one (8d).
H = 308.0898, found 308.0899.
Prepared using the general method from lithium hydroxide
4.1.8 (E)-1-(2-Methoxypyridin-3-yl)-3-(2-(trifluoromethyl)-
(1.2 mg, 0.01 mmol), 2’-methoxyacetophenone (72 mg, 0.48
phenyl)prop-2-en-1-one (8h).
mmol) and 3-trifluoromethyl-2-pyridinecarboxaldehyde (6d, 85
mg, 0.49 mmol) in absolute methanol (final reaction volume = 4
mL). The reaction mixture was purified by chromatography on
silica gel (gradient of 0 – 100% ethyl acetate in hexane) to give
Prepared using the general method from lithium hydroxide (1
mg, 0.04 mmol), 2-(trifluoromethyl)benzaldehyde (34 mg, 0.2
mmol) and 1-(2-methoxypyridin-3-yl)ethanone (7d, 29 mg, 0.19
mmol) in absolute methanol (final reaction volume = 1.5 mL).
The reaction mixture was purified by chromatography on silica
the desired product as a yellow oil that hardened upon standing
1
(77 mg, 54%). H-NMR (CDCl
3
) 8.82 (d, J = 4.3 Hz 1H), 8.12
(
1
d, J = 15.0 Hz, 1H), 8.01 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.93 (dd, J =
5.0, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (t, J = 7.4
Hz, 1H), 7.41 (dd, J = 7.5, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H),
gel (40% ethyl acetate in hexane) to give the desired product as a
1
yellow solid (29 mg, 49%). H-NMR (CDCl
3
) 8.36 (dd, J =
4.8, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.08 (dd, J = 7.4, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.05 (dd, J =
15.6, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 7.8 Hz,
1H), 7.63 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (d, J
1
3
7
1
1
.02 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 3.93 (s, 3H).
3
C-NMR (CDCl )
92.4, 158.6, 152.3, 151.6, 135.4, 134.1, 133.9, 133.5, 130.6,
13
28.8, 125.8, 125.1, 123.2, 120.8, 111.6, 55.7. HRMS (FAB):
= 15.7 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (dd, J = 7.4, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 4.09 (s, 3H). C-
NMR (CDCl ) 189.3, 160.6, 149.5, 138.9, 137.9, 135.9, 131.0,
30.1, 129.8, 128.6, 126.9, 125.2, 124.5, 121.2, 116.1, 52.8.
HRMS (FAB): calc’d C16 NO + H = 308.0898, found
calc’d C16
12 3
H F NO
2
+ H = 308.0898, found 308.0897.
3
1
4
.1.5 (E)-1-(3-Methoxypyridin-2-yl)-3-(2-(trifluoromethyl)-
H
12
F
3
2
phenyl)prop-2-en-1-one (8e).
3
08.0874.
.2 Calculated logP and TPSA.
Predicted octanol/water partition coefficients (logP) and
Prepared using the general method from lithium hydroxide (2
mg, 0.05 mmol), 2-(trifluoromethyl)benzaldehyde (47 mg, 0.27
mmol) and 1-(3-methoxypyridin-2-yl)ethanone (7a, 40 mg, 0.26
mmol) in absolute methanol (final reaction volume = 6 mL). The
reaction mixture was purified by chromatography on silica gel
4
topological polar surface areas (TPSA) were calculated using the
Marvin calculator plugin available in MarvinSketch from
ChemAxon (Budapest, Hungary). The logP calculator employs a
(gradient of o – 100% ethyl acetate in hexane) to give the desired
3
3
product as yellow oil that hardened upon standing (43 mg, 54%).
variation on the atomic fragment method originally described
1
34
H-NMR (CDCl
3
) 8.33 (dd, J = 4.4, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 8.09 (dd, J =
by Viswanadhan et al. The TPSA calculator uses the fragment-
3
5
1
1
=
1
1
1
5.9, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.90 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.73 ((d, J = 7.7 Hz,
H), 7.71 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (t, J
based summation method described by Ertl et al.
.3 Molecular modeling.
Modeling and LUMO energy calculations were performed
4
7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (dd, J = 8.6, 4.4 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (dd, J = 8.6,
13
.3 Hz, 1H), 3.96 (s, 3H). C-NMR (CDCl
44.3, 140.4, 139.7, 134.1, 132.0, 129.6, 129.3, 129.0, 128.4,
28.1, 127.1, 126.1, 119.8, 55.9. HRMS (FAB): calc’d
NO + H = 308.0898, found 308.0899.
.1.6 (E)-1-(4-Methoxypyridin-3-yl)-3-(trifluoromethyl)-
3
) 190.0, 155.6,
36
using the Molecular Operating Environment (MOE), the
37
38
MMFF94 potential and the MOPAC interface of MOE.
4
.4 Solubility assays.
C
H F
16 12 3
2
Solubility assays were performed using Millipore
4
MultiScreen®HTS-PFC Filter Plates designed for solubility
assays (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA). The 96-well plates
consist of two chambers separated by a filter. Liquid handling
was performed using JANUS® Verispan and MTD workstations
phenyl)prop-2-en-1-one (8f).
Prepared using the general method from lithium hydroxide
(0.8 mg, 0.032 mmol), 2-(trifluoromethyl)benzaldehyde (28 mg,
0
0
.16 mmol) and 1-(4-methoxypyridin-3-yl)ethanone (7b, 24 mg,
.15 mmol) in absolute methanol (final reaction volume = 1.5
(Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA). 4 uL of drug solutions (10 mM
in DMSO) are added to 196 uL of the appropriate medium in top
chamber to give a final DMSO concentration of 2% and a
theoretical drug concentration of 200 uM. Plates are gently
shaken for 90 minutes and then subjected to vacuum. Insoluble
drug is captured on the filter. 160 uL of the filtrate is transferred
to 96-well Griener UV Star® analysis plates (Sigma-Aldrich, St.
Louis, MO) containing 40 uL of acetonitrile. The drug
concentration in the filtrate is measured by UV absorbance on a
mL). The reaction was purified by chromatography on silica gel
5% methanol in ethyl acetate) to give the desired product as a
(
1
yellow solid (38 mg, 83%). H-NMR (CDCl
Hz, 1H), 7.97 (dd, J = 15.8, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H),
.75 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (t, J = 7.5
Hz, 1H), 7.35 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 1H), 3.98
3
) 8.64 (d, J = 5.9
7
1
3
(s, 3H). C-NMR (CDCl
3
) 190.7, 163.9, 154.0, 151.3, 139.9,
1
1
33.8, 132.1, 130.3, 129.8, 128.0, 126.3, 126.2, 125.3, 122.5,
®
Spectromax Plus microplate reader (Molecular Devices,
06.9, 55.8. HRMS (FAB): calc’d C16
H
12
F
3
NO
2
+ H = 308.0898,
NO + H =
Sunnyvale, CA) using Softmax Pro software v. 5.4.5.
Absorbances at 5 wavelengths (280, 300, 320, 340, and 360 nM)
were summed to generate the UV signal. Assays were performed
in triplicate. Standard curves were generated by adding 4 uL of
50x of five concentrations of test compounds in DMSO to 40 uL
of acetonitrile in UV Star plates followed by 156 uL of the
appropriate solubility medium. Analysis and statistics were
found 308.0899. HRMS (FAB): calc’d C16
3
H
12
F
3
2
08.0898, found 308.0904.
4
.1.7 (E)-1-(3-Methoxypyridin-4-yl)-3-(2-(trifluoromethyl)-
phenyl)prop-2-en-1-one (8g).
Prepared using the general method from lithium hydroxide
(1.75 mg, 0.073 mmol), 2-(trifluoromethyl)benzaldehyde (51 mg.
®
performed using GraphPad Prism v. 5.04. Data are reported as
0.37 mmol) and 1-(3-methoxypyridin-4-yl)ethanone (7c, 55 mg.