10.1002/cctc.201601635
ChemCatChem
FULL PAPER
described above. Ag/H-Z40-haw catalysts containing 1, 2, and 10 wt.% of
the metal were additionally prepared following the same procedure.
number of moles of glycerol reacted and the mole of glycerol fed, the
selectivity to product i as the number of moles of product i formed per mole
of glycerol reacted, and the yield of product i as the product between
glycerol conversion and selectivity to product i. The carbon balance was
calculated as the ratio between the number of moles of carbon in the
condensate and the number of moles of carbon fed. The experimental
error, determined on the basis of three repetitions under selected testing
conditions, was within ±5%.
Catalyst characterization
The metal content in the catalysts was determined by X-ray fluorescence
spectroscopy (XRF) using a Orbis Micro XRF instrument equipped with a
Rh source operated at 35 kV and 500 µA. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD)
was performed using a PANalytical X’Pert PRO-MPD diffractometer with
Ni-filtered Cu Ka radiation (l = 0.1541 nm), acquiring data in the 10–60°
2q range with an angular step size of 0.05° and a counting time of 2 s per
step. The crystallinity of the zeolite in the catalysts was estimated from the
ratio between the area of selected reflections (23.1, 24.0, and 24.4° 2q) of
the modified and parent samples. N2 sorption at 77 K was conducted using
a Micromeritics TriStar analyzer. Prior to the measurements, the solids
were degassed at 573 K under vacuum for 3 h. Fourier transform infrared
spectroscopy (FTIR) of adsorbed pyridine was conducted using a Bruker
IFS66 spectrometer equipped with a mercury-cadmium-telluride (MCT)
detector. Wafers (ca. 1 cm2, 20 mg) were degassed at 693 K under
vacuum for 4 h, cooled to room temperature and exposed to pyridine
vapors (Sigma-Aldrich, >99%). Thereafter, they were evacuated at room
temperature (15 min) and at 473 K (30 min). Spectra were recorded in the
4000-1300 cm–1 range by accumulation of 32 scans with a resolution of
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation
(Projects 200020-159760 and 200021-169679). The Scientific
Center for Optical and Electron Microscopy at ETH Zurich,
ScopeM, is acknowledged for the use of its facilities. Ms. E.
Vorobjeva is thanked for the STEM analyses.
Keywords: allylic compounds • glycerol valorization •
hierarchical zeolites • hydrogenation • silver
[1]
[2]
M. Pagliaro, R. Cirimmina, H. Kimura, M. Rossi, C. Della Pina, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4434-4440.
4 cm–1
. The concentration of Brønsted- and Lewis-acid sites was
determined by integration of the peaks at 1545 and 1455 cm–1 using 1.67
and 2.22 cm µmol–1 as the extinction coefficients, respectively.[10c]
Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) was undertaken using
a FEI TalosTM F200X microscope operated at 300 kV (field emission gun).
The particle size distribution was determined by counting more than 100
particles and fitted by a Gaussian model. The samples were prepared by
dusting the catalysts onto standard copper mesh holey carbon supported
grids.
a) M. Dolores Soriano, P. Concepción, J. M. López Nieto, F. Cavani, S.
Guidetti, C. Trevisanut, Green Chem. 2011, 13, 2954-2962; b) Y. Shen,
S. Zhang, H. Li, Y. Ren, H. Liu, Chem. - Eur. J. 2010, 15, 7368-7371; c)
M. Aresta, A. Dibenedetto, F. Nocito, C. Pastore, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
2006, 257, 149-153; d) A. Alhanash, E. F. Kozhevnikova, I. V.
Kozhevnikov, Catal. Lett. 2008, 120, 307-311.
[3]
[4]
a) C. L. Rinsch, X. Chen, V. Panchalingam, R. C. Eberhart, J.-H. Wang,
R. B. Timmons, Langmuir 1996, 12, 2995-3002; b) L. Harvey, E.
Kennedy, B. Z. Dlugogorski, M. Stockenhuber, Appl. Catal., A 2015, 489,
241-246.
a) P. Claus, Appl. Catal., A 2005, 291, 222-229; b) K. Weissermel, H.-J.
Arpe, Industrial Organic Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2008, pp.
217-238.
Catalytic testing
The gas-phase conversion of glycerol into allyl alcohol was studied in the
0.1-4.0 MPa pressure range in an Effi Microactivity Reactor (PID
Eng&Tech) comprising: (i) mass flow controllers for feeding N2 (PanGas,
99.999%) and H2 (Messer, 99.999%), (ii) a high-performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC) pump for the feeding of the glycerol solution
(20 wt.% in water, Sigma-Aldrich), (iii) a tubular stainless steel micro-
reactor (i.d. = 6 mm) heated in an oven, and (iv) a liquid-gas separator
located downstream of the reactor and kept at 273 K. The catalyst (0.1 g,
particle size = 0.2–0.4 mm) was loaded into the reactor and the system
was heated to 673 K in N2 flow (100 cm3 min–1). Thereafter, the gas
composition was changed to 20 vol.% H2/N2 for 2 h to reduce the catalyst.
The temperature, pressure, and gas composition were modified to the
desired reaction values and the system allowed to equilibrate for 30 min,
[5]
[6]
B. Katryniok, S. Paul, F. Dumeignil, ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 1819-1834.
a) G. Sánchez, J. Friggieri, A. A. Adesina, B. Z. Dlugogorski, E. M.
Kennedy, M. Stockenhuber, Catal. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 3090-3098; b)
D. S. Kim, W. J. Lee, M. Kong, Y.-J. Choe, H. Nam, US Pat. 9120718,
2015.
[7]
[8]
A. Alhanash, E. F. Kozhevnikova, I. V. Kozhevnikov, Appl. Catal., A
2010, 378, 11-18.
a) E. Tsukuda, S. Sato, R. Takahashi, T. Sodesawa, Catal. Commun.
2007, 8, 1349-1353; b) F. Cavani, S. Guidetti, L. Marinelli, M. Piccinini,
E. Ghedini, M. Signoretto, Appl. Catal., B 2010, 100, 194-204;
A. Corma, G. W. Huber, L. Sauvanaud, P. O’Connor, J. Catal. 2008, 257,
163-171.
[9]
[10] a) L. G. Possato, R. N. Diniz, T. Garetto, S. H. Pulcinelli, C. V. Santilli, L.
Martins, J. Catal. 2013, 300, 102-112; b) C.-J. Jia, Y. Liu, W. Schmidt,
A.-H. Lu, F. Schüth, J. Catal. 2010, 269, 71-79; c) M. Milina, S. Mitchell,
N.-L. Michels, J. Kenvin, J. Pérez Ramírez, J. Catal. 2013, 308, 398-407;
d) R. Srivastava, M. Choi, R. Ryoo, Chem. Commun. 2006, 4489-4491.
[11] a) B. Coq, F. Figueras, P. Geneste, C. Moreau, P. Moreau, M.
Warawdekar, J. Mol. Catal. 1993, 78, 211-226; b) W. Grünert, A.
Brückner, H. Hofmeister, P. Claus, J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 5709-
5717; c) T. H. Vanderspurt, US Pat. 4072727, 1978.
before the liquid feed was admitted at a rate of 0.1 cm3 min–1 Liquid
.
samples were periodically collected at the liquid-gas separator and
analyzed by HPLC using an Agilent 1260 system equipped with an HPX-
87H column kept at 308 K and a refraction index detector. A 0.005 M
aqueous H2SO4 solution flowing at 0.600 cm3 min−1 was used as the eluent.
Calibration curves were measured in the 0.1–20 wt.% range using glycerol
(Sigma-Aldrich, 99%), acrolein (Fluka, >95%), allyl alcohol (Sigma-Aldrich,
>99%), hydroxyacetone (Alfa Aesar, 95%), 1,2-propanediol (Acros
Organics, 99%), propanol (Sigma-Aldrich, >99%), and propanal (Sigma-
Aldrich, 97%). The conversion was calculated as the ratio between the
[12] a) C. Mohr, H. Hofmeister, M. Lucas, P. Claus, Chem. Eng. Technol.
2000, 12, 324-328; b) M. Bron, D. Teschner, A. Knop-Gericke, F. C.
Jentoft, J. Kröhnert, J. Hohmeyer, C. Volckmar, B. Steinhauer, R. Schlögl,
P. Claus, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 3559-3569.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.