Inorganic Chemistry
Article
and 32 ee, which corresponded to an s-factor of 2.6 (entry 1).
The related diastereoisomer Δ(R,R)-2 I− displayed a lower
catalytic activity with only 16% conversion and, importantly,
gave the opposite enantiomer of 4a with 33% ee and an s-factor
of 2.1 (entry 2). The testing of some other solvents (entries 3−
10) revealed that Λ(R,R)-2 I− is more active than Δ(R,R)-2 I−
in terms of conversion. It was found that chlorobenzene is the
solvent of choice to get the best s-factors (2.8 and 2.3,
correspondingly), where ee values were 40% and −38%
(entries 9 and 10). The remaining epoxide was partially
enantiomerically enriched 24% ee (entry 9). Expectedly, the
selectivity factor s determined by using Kagan’s equation19 was
the same (2.9) as for the s-factor calculated without taking into
consideration the remaining epoxide ee (see Table 1). In
contrast, the previously reported catalysts Λ(R,R)-1a I− and
Λ(R,R)-1b I− provided the cyclic carbonate 4a with a lower s-
factor (1.5) (compare entries 9−12), showing the superiority
of the complexes 2 obtained in this work. Although the s-values
are moderate, they are the best currently for this type of
substrate. Note that the absolute configuration of the obtained
product 4a was not assigned.
metal Co(III) complexes 2 based on commercially available
(R,R)-1,2-diphenylethylenediamine and salicylaldehyde. The
obtained metal-templated Λ and Δ complexes 2 with an iodide
anion act as bifunctional hydrogen-bond donor/nucleophilic
catalysts for the kinetic resolution of several epoxides with
carbon dioxide providing both diastereomers of the target
cyclic carbonates. The highest s-factor of 2.8 was achieved at a
33% conversion and low catalyst loading (2 mol %) in
chlorobenzene for the trans-chalcone epoxide 3a. It was
observed that the Λ diastereomer of the complex 2 is superior
to the Δ form in terms of catalytic activity. In summary, the
attractive key features of the chiral-at-cobalt complexes
presented here are (1) the formation of both diastereomers
of the Co(III) complex in contrast to those of our previous
results7 is observed for the first time; (2) as a proof of
c
principle, it was demonstrated that the obtained complexes act
as pseudo-enantiomeric catalysts in the challenging kinetic
resolution of epoxides with CO2; (3) the modification of the
core of the Co(III) complex by changing the chiral diamine led
to the formation of a more efficient catalyst for the reaction in
terms of enantioselectivity. Work is ongoing to further explore
the application of the obtained diastereomeric Co(III)
complexes in other organic transformations.
Next, in order to demonstrate the general applicability of the
reaction, the terminal epoxides 3b−3d were examined (Figure
3). Because the reactivity of the terminal epoxides is higher, we
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
sı
* Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at
Procedure for the preparation of the complexes 2, the
general procedure for the coupling of epoxides 3 with
CO2, X-ray diffraction study of the Co(III) complexes 2,
copies of UV−vis and 1H and 13C NMR spectra, HPLC
Accession Codes
tallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained
Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road,
Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033.
Figure 3. Kinetic resolution of different epoxides. Reaction
conditions: 2 mol % catalyst, 1 bar of CO2, 25 °C, 6−8 h.
1
Conversions were determined by a H NMR analysis. The ee was
AUTHOR INFORMATION
determined by a chiral HPLC analysis.
■
Corresponding Author
could perform the reactions with 1 bar of CO2 at 25 °C. The
coupling of styrene oxide 3b with CO2 provided the desired
carbonate 4b in 13% conversion with 6% ee (s = 1.1). Glycidyl
phenylether 3c gave the product 4c with 30% conversion and
18% ee (s = 1.5). N,N-Diphenylaminomethyloxirane 3d
afforded the carbonate 4d with 31% conversion and 23% ee
(s = 1.8). Notably, no kinetic resolution was observed for
monosubstituted epoxides in the case of the catalyst Δ(S,S)-1b
I−.13 We assume that the HBD ability of the Co(III)
complexes is responsible for the epoxide activation via weak
hydrogen-bonding interactions20 and that the reaction
mechanism is analogous to the mechanism described in our
previous reports.13,21
Vladimir A. Larionov − A.N. Nesmeyanov Institute of
Organoelement Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences,
119991 Moscow, Russian Federation; Peoples’ Friendship
University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow,
Authors
Mikhail A. Emelyanov − A.N. Nesmeyanov Institute of
Organoelement Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences,
119991 Moscow, Russian Federation
Nadezhda V. Stoletova − A.N. Nesmeyanov Institute of
Organoelement Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences,
119991 Moscow, Russian Federation
Alexander F. Smol’yakov − A.N. Nesmeyanov Institute of
Organoelement Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences,
119991 Moscow, Russian Federation
CONCLUSIONS
■
In conclusion, we here reported the first synthesis and
characterization of the diastereomeric octahedral chiral-at-
D
Inorg. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX