1454
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 56, No. 7, July, 2007
Lepeshkin et al.
with the use of the PBE exchangeꢀcorrelation potential.18 The
total energies were calculated both with and without the zeroꢀ
point energy correction. The tripleꢀzeta (TZ) basis set was used
for the sulfur atom, and the doubleꢀzeta (DZ) basis set was used
for all other atoms.19 The character of stationary points was
estimated from the number of negative eigenvalues of the
Gaussian. The calculations were performed with the use of the
PRIRODA program (version 1.10). The course of the reacꢀ
tions and the purity of the compounds were monitored by TLC
on Silufol UVꢀ254 plates (before chromatography of compounds
(d, C(3´), C(5´));* (d, C(2″), C(6″));* (d, C(3″), C(5″));*
1
1
131.36 ( J
= 161.4 Hz); 126.49 ( J
= 162.5 Hz):
C,H
C,H
(d, C(4´));* (d, C(4″)).*
Method C. Triethylamine hydrochloride (1.10 g, 10 mmol)
was added to acetone (20 mL). The suspension was refluxed for
10 min and cooled to 20 °C. Compound 1b (2.69 g, 10 mmol)
was added to the reaction mixture. The mixture was stirred at
20 °C for 12 h and diluted with water (10 mL). The product was
isolated and purified according to the method B. Compound 4b
was obtained in a yield of 1.51 g (60%).
2
0
1
3
4
b,f,g, the plates were kept in Et N vapor for 3 min) using a
4ꢀR ꢀ2ꢀR ꢀThiazoles 2b,f,g (general procedure). A solution
3
of HCl (d = 1.18 g cm– ; 0.9 mL, 10 mmol) in Pr OH (7 mL)
1
i
2
0 : 1 : 3 chloroform—acetone—hexane mixture as the eluent;
3
the visualization was carried out with UV light and iodine vapor.
The melting points and the results of IR spectroscopy, mass
was added to a boiling solution of the corresponding ∆ ꢀthiazoline
4b,f,g (10 mmol) in Pr OH (50 mL). The reaction solution was
i
1
spectrometry, and H NMR spectroscopy for compounds 2a—g
refluxed for 1 min, neutralized with aqueous NH to pH = 8,
3
are consistent with those published earlier.1
,21
The starting
and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was recrystallized from
i
thiazolines 1a—g were synthesized according to a known proceꢀ
dure.1
aqueous Pr OH. The yields of compounds 2b, 2f, and 2g (see
Ref. 1) were 2.38 g (95%), 2.61 g (90%), and 3.01 g (92%),
respectively.
2
ꢀBenzylꢀ4ꢀtrifluoromethylthiazole (2c). A mixture of
∆2
.18 g cm ) HCl (0.45 mL, 5 mmol) in Pr OH (15 mL) was
ꢀhydroxythiazoline 1c (1.31 g, 5 mmol) and concentrated (d =
Thiazoles 2b, 2b(D1), and 2b(D2).** A solution of 6.1 M
–
1
i
1
DCl (0.36 г 2.42 mmol) in D O was added to a 9 : 1
2
refluxed for 1 min. Aqueous NH3 was added to the reaction
mixture to pH = 8. The reaction solution was cooled and conꢀ
C H OD—C H OH mixture (7 mL). The reaction solution was
heated to 75 °C, and then ∆ ꢀhydroxythiazoline 1b (0.65 g,
2
5
2
5
2
centrated in vacuo. A 2 : 1 petroleum ether—Et O mixture
2.42 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was refluxed
2
2
(
30 mL) was added to the residue. Unconsumed ∆ ꢀhydroxyꢀ
for 40 s, neutralized with aqueous NH to pH = 8, and concenꢀ
3
thiazoline 1c was filtered off, the solvent was removed in vacuo,
and water (10 mL) was added to the residue. The crystals that
precipitated were filtered off and washed with water. Compound
trated in vacuo. Water (10 mL) was added to the residue. The
crystals were filtered off and washed with water. A mixture of
compounds 2b, 2b(D1), and 2b(D2) was obtained in a yield of
c was obtained in a yield of 0.35 g (29%).1
0.57 g (93%) (see Table 2). H NMR (DMSOꢀd ), δ, a mixture
1
2
6
2
2
ꢀMethylꢀ4ꢀphenylthiazole (2a). A mixture of ∆ ꢀhydroxyꢀ
thiazoline 1a (1.93 g, 10 mmol) and concentrated (d =
of thiazoles 2b, 2b(D1), and 2b(D2): 4.382 (s, 2 H, 2ꢀCH , 2b);
2
4.363 (s, 1 H, 2ꢀCHD, 2b(D1)); 7.93 (s, 1 H, H(5), 2b, 2b(D1),
2b(D2)); 7.97 (m, 2 H, H(2″), H(6″), 2b, 2b(D1), 2b(D2));
7.25—7.45 (m, 8 H, H(2´)—H(6´), H(3″)—H(5″), 2b, 2b(D1),
–
1
i
1.18 g mL ) HCl (0.90 mL, 10 mmol) in Pr OH (20 mL) was
refluxed for 20 min. Aqueous NH was added to the reaction
3
13
mixture to pH = 8, and the reaction solution was cooled and
concentrated in vacuo. The residue was recrystallized from aqueꢀ
ous ethanol (1 : 1). Compound 2a was obtained in a yield of
2b(D2)). C NMR (DMSOꢀd ), δ, a mixture of thiazoles 2b,
6
2b(D1), and 2b(D2): 169.980 (s, C(2), 2b); 169.942 (s, C(2),
2b(D1)); 169.904 (s, C(2), 2b(D2)); 154.1 (s, C(4), 2b, 2b(D1),
2b(D2)); 138.132 (s, C(1´), 2b); 138.100 (s, C(1´), 2b(D1));
1
.35 g (77%).21
1
2
3
4
ꢀPhenylꢀ2ꢀ(R R C)ꢀ∆ ꢀthiazolines 4b,f,g. Method A. Aceꢀ
138.067 (s, C(1´), 2b(D2)); 134.2 (s, C(1″), 2b, 2b(D1), 2b(D2));
1
tic acid (0.30 g, 5 mmol) was added to a solution of the correꢀ
129.0 (d, C(2´), C(6´), J
= 158.5 Hz, 2b, 2b(D1), 2b(D2));
= 160.0 Hz, 2b, 2b(D1), 2b(D2));
C,H
2
a
1
sponding ∆ ꢀhydroxythiazoline 1b,f,g (5 mmol) in dioxane
128.7 (d, C(3´), C(5´), J
C,H
a
1
(
30 mL) at 20 °C. After 12 h, the solvent was removed in vacuo,
128.8 (d, C(3″), C(5″), J
= 160.0 Hz, 2b, 2b(D1), 2b(D2));
C,H
i
b
1
b
and Pr OH (10 mL) was added to the residue. The crystals that
formed were filtered off and washed with aqueous Pr OH (1 : 1)
126.9 (d, C(4´), J
= 161.0 Hz, 2b, 2b(D1), 2b(D2)); 127.9
(d, C(4″), JC,H = 161.0 Hz, 2b, 2b(D1), 2b(D2)); 126.1
= 160.0 Hz, 2b, 2b(D1), 2b(D2)); 114.2
(d, C(5), JC,H = 189.0 Hz, 2b, 2b(D1), 2b(D2)); 38.811 (t,
2ꢀCH2, 1JC,H = 129.7 Hz, 2b); 38.500 (t, 2ꢀCHD, JC,D
C,H
i
1
1
and water. Acetone was used for recrystallization of comꢀ
(d, C(2″), C(6″), J
C,H
i
1
pound 4b; Pr OH, for compounds 4f,g (see Table 1).
1
Method B. Triethylamine (1.01 g, 10 mmol) and phenacyl
bromide (1.99 g, 10 mmol) were successively added to a solution
of thioamide of phenylacetic acid (1.51 g, 10 mmol) in acetone
=
c
19.8 Hz, 2b(D1)) .
A mixture of compounds 2b, 2b(D1), and 2b(D2) was synꢀ
(
20 mL) at 20 °C. After 8 h, water (10 mL) was added to the
thesized analogously in a yield of 0.58 g (95%) (see Table 2) by
the reaction of 6.1 M DCl (0.36 g, 2.42 mmol) with ∆ ꢀthiazoline
3
reaction mixture, and the crystals that formed were filtered off,
washed with aqueous acetone (1 : 1) and water, and recrystalꢀ
lized from acetone. Compound 4b was obtained in a yield of
1
(
1
4b (0.61 g, 2.42 mmol) in a 9 : 1 C H OD—C H OH mixꢀ
2
5
2
5
ture (7 mL).
1
3
.68 g (67%).* C NMR (CDCl ), δ: 155.39 (s, C(2)); 168.69
3
1
s, C(4)); 44.28 (t, C(5), J
= 143.5 Hz); 119.77 (d, 2ꢀCH,
C,H
JC,H = 158.2 Hz); 136.26 (s, C(1´)); 132.95 (s, C(1″));** 128.66
* The group of signals belongs to a group of atoms.
(1
1
JC,H = 161.0 Hz); 128.41 ( J
1
= 161.0 Hz); 127.95 ( J
1
=
** The atomic numbering scheme for compounds 2b(D1) and
2b(D2) is identical to that for compound 2b (see Scheme 1).
C,H
C,H
1
60.0 Hz); 127.93 ( J
= 159.5 Hz): (d, C(2´), C(6´));**
C,H
a,b
The inverse assignment of the signals denoted by the same
*
The atomic numbering scheme for compound 4b is identical to
letters is possible.
The multiplicities and the spinꢀspin coupling constants in the
spectrum measured with full proton spinꢀspin decoupling.
c
that for compound 2b (see Scheme 1).
* The group of signals belongs to a group of atoms.
*