ing the additions in the presence of TMSCl leads to enhanced
ratios of 1,4- to 1,2-adducts.3,5,6 These reactions are strongly
accelerated by the added TMSCl.
Table 1. Pd(0)-Catalyzed 1,4-Additions of Organozinc
Reagents to Conjugated Enals 1 and 6-9 and Enone 10
Kurosawa and co-workers studied Pd(0)-catalyzed 1,4-
additions of disilanes to cinnamaldehyde and crotonaldehyde
in the presence of TMSOTf, which led to mixtures of (E)-
and (Z)-enol silanes of the 1,4-adducts together with silyl
7
R1
R2
R3
product yield, %a yield, %b
ethers of the 1,2-adducts. On the basis of X-ray crystal
2
3
structures, they surmised that η and η palladium complexes
C6H13
H
H (1)
H (6)
H (7)
H (8)
2
11
12
13
14
15
83
73
89
52
80
79
92
76
90
51
80
-
of the enal substrates are involved in these reactions.
TBDPSO(CH2)3
c-C6H11
H
H
H
Additionally, the Pd complex of acrolein coordinated to BF
3
C6H5
undergoes O-methylation with methyl triflate to produce the
8
(CH3)2CdCH(CH2)2 CH3 H (9)
corresponding enol ether Pd complex. Nickel-catalyzed 1,4-
c-C6H11
H
CH3 (10)
additions of organozinc reagents to enals and (mainly) enones
9
,10
a
L ) PPh3. b No ligand.
are known, but analogous palladium-catalyzed additions
have not been reported. To appraise the scope and potential
synthetic applications of such additions, we undertook the
following investigations.
conjugated acyl oxazolidinones, esters, or nitriles were
unsuccessful. Only starting materials were recovered from
these experiments.
Following the precedent of cuprate 1,4-additions, we
investigated the effect of added TMSCl on the Pd-catalyzed
Using (E)-2-nonenal (1) as our prototype aldehyde, we
found that the commercially available diethyl-, dimethyl-,
and diphenylzinc reagents afford the 1,4-adducts 2-4 in
satisfactory yield in the presence of 5 mol % of the
1
,4-addition of diethylzinc to (E)-2-nonenal. Unlike the
2 3
Pd(OAc) ‚PPh precatalyst in THF (Scheme 1). Dibutylzinc,
enhancements observed in cuprate reactions, the presence
of TMSCl in the palladium-catalyzed reactions inhibited the
addition and resulted in diminished yields of the 1,4-adduct
and multiple side products. On the other hand, yields of the
Scheme 1. Pd(0)-Catalyzed 1,4-Additions of Organozinc
Reagents to (E)-Nonenal
1
,4-adducts were comparable or slightly higher when the
reaction mixtures were quenched with TBSOTf to afford the
isolable enol silane adducts (Table 2). Presumably, this
Table 2. Pd(0)-Catalyzed 1,4-Additions of Organozinc
Reagents to Conjugated Enals and Subsequent in Situ Enolate
Trapping with TBSOTf
prepared according to Noller,11 was also a ready participant
in the 1,4-addition.
The diethylzinc additions were extended to a number of
different conjugated aldehydes and a representative enone
(
Table 1). Comparable yields of 1,4-adducts were obtained
R1
R
product
yield, %
(E)/(Z)
from reactions in which the PPh ligand was not present.
3
C6H13 (1)
C6H13 (1)
TBDPSO(CH2)3 (6)
c-C6H11 (7)
C6H5 (8)
Et
16
17
18
19
20
92
62
95
70
51
>20:1
12:1
>20:1
>20:1
7:1
However, purification of the products was more difficult in
those reactions owing to the precipitation of persistent
palladium byproducts. Attempts to effect 1,4-additions to
Bu
Et
Et
Et
(
3) (a) Dieter, R. K.; Alexander, C. W.; Nice, L. E. Tetrahedron 2000,
5
3
6, 2767. (b) Linderman, R. J.; McKenzie, J. R. J. Organomet. Chem. 1989,
61, 31.
procedure minimizes side reactions of the intermediate zinc
enolates such as oxidation, aldol condensation, and Michael
additions. The (E) isomers were highly favored products
of these reactions. A possible mechanistic pathway is outlined
in Figure 3.
Our next series of experiments was conducted to determine
the effect of a γ-stereocenter on the stereoselectivity of the
addition. Aldehyde 21 was prepared by Wittig homologation
(
4) (a) Chuit, C.; Foulon, J. P.; Normant, J. F. Tetrahedron 1981, 37,
1
385. (b) Bourgain-Commercon, M.; Foulon, J.-P.; Normant, J. F. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1982, 228, 321. (c) Drouin, J.; Rousseau, G. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1985, 289, 223. (d) Horiguchi, Y.; Matsuzawa, S.;
Nakamura, E.; Kuwajima, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 4025. (e)
Nakamura, E.; Matsuzawa, S.; Horiguchi, Y.; Kuwajima, I. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1986, 27, 4029.
12
(5) Lipshutz, B. H.; Wood, M. R.; Tirado, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
1
17, 6126.
(
(
6) Corey, E. J.; Boaz, N. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 6019.
7) Ogoshi, S.; Tomeyasu, S.; Morita, M.; Kurosawa, H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 11598.
8) (a) Ogoshi, S.; Yoshida, T.; Nishida, T.; Morita, M.; Kurosawa, H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1944. (b) Ogoshi, S.; Morita, M.; Kurosawa,
H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9020. (c) Morita, M.; Inoue, K.; Ogoshi,
S.; Kurosawa, H. Organometallics 2003, 22, 5468.
(
(9) (a) Petrier, C.; de Souza Barbosa, J. C.; Dupuy, C.; Luche, J.-L. J.
Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 5761. (b) Ikeda, S.-i.; Yamamoto, H.; Kondo, K.;
Sato, Y. Organometallics 1995, 14, 5015. (c) Review: Erdik, E. Tetrahedron
1992, 48, 9577.
5506
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 24, 2006