2512
F. Fache et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 2511–2513
OAc
OH
OH
OAc
ii)
OAc
O
OH
O
OH
iii)
6
i)
v)
O
O
iv)
7 (ii + iii : 28%)
(iv: 32%)
5 (91%)
1 (70%)
4
vi)
OAc
OH
O
vii)
O
COOH
8 (50%)
COOH
2 (15%)
Scheme 2. (i) CH3COCl, Et3N; (ii) OsO4, NMO tBuOH, H2O; (iii) NaIO4; (iv) RuCl3, NaIO4; (v) K2CO3, MeOH, H2O (vi)
NaClO2, H2O2; (vii) K2CO3, MeOH, H2O.
derivative. During the reaction, we detected an interme-
diate product which should be diol 6 in agreement with
the results published by Shing et al.10 for the synthesis
of a diol from alkenes with the same system. After two
hours we added a new portion of NaIO4 to go to
completion. As the two procedures led to the same
isolated yield (30%), we chose the second one, which is
easier to carry out. Moreover, catalytic amounts of
RuCl3 were necessary (7%) against 20% for OsO4.
Compound 7 was oxidized into 8 with H2O2·NaClO2, a
mild selective method for the oxidation of aldehyde
into acid.11 We have also tested the procedure devel-
oped by Noyori et al.12 which allowed the selective
oxidation by H2O2 of an aldehyde in the presence of an
hydroxy function on the same molecule but without
success. Starting from 1, we never obtained 2. In both
cases (7 and 8) the desired products 1 and 2 were finally
obtained by deprotection according to a classical proce-
dure.13 In the case of the acid 2, the isolated yield after
deprotection was quite low probably due to its high
solubility into water. Nevertheless, the conditions have
not been optimized. It is noted that both aldehydes 1
and 7 can be stored several days at −15 °C without
degradation.
of RuCl3·3H2O (18.3 mg) and 1.5 mmol of NaIO4 (321
mg) in 2 mL of H2O were added. After a few minutes,
we noticed the appearance of the intermediate diol 6
and after 2 h, all the starting material was consumed.
Then 1.3 mmol of NaIO4 (285 mg) in 6 mL of H2O
were added again and the reaction mixture was allowed
to stir for 5 additional h. The organic phase was
washed with a saturated aqueous solution of Na2S2O3
and the aqueous phase extracted with CH2Cl2. The
combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4. After
evaporation and chromatography on silica (AcOEt–
petroleum ether: 1/3) the desired product 7 was isolated
1
with 32% yield. H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) 0.85 (s,
3H), 1.31 (s, 3H), 2.05 (m, 3H), 2.15 (s, 3H), 2.4 (m,
2H), 2.95 (dd, J=7.2 Hz, J=12 Hz, 1H), 4.54 (d,
J=3.7 Hz, 2H), 9.72 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) 17.7,
20.5, 22.1, 30.5, 35.9, 43.8, 45.1, 50.1, 68.4, 170.1, 201.1,
202.2.
Product 1: 3.34 mmol of 7 (764 mg) were stirred under
nitrogen with 8.54 mmol of K2CO3 (1.18 g) in 118 mL
of MeOH and 12 mL of H2O. After 1.5 h the reaction
medium was poured into ice water and extracted with
CH2Cl2 to give 435 mg of pure product 1 (70% isolated
1
yield) without further purification. H NMR 0.82 (s,
In conclusion, even if the synthesis of these products
should be improved, we have realized the first synthesis
of hydroxy-pinonaldehyde and hydroxy-pinonic acid,
terpene degradation products present in the atmo-
sphere. These products are now currently tested to
verify previous studies and to contribute to the elucida-
tion of the terpene atmospheric degradation pathway.
3H), 1.28 (s, 3H), 2.05 (m, 3H), 2.47 (m, 2H), 2.91 (dd,
J=7.7 Hz, J=12 Hz, 1H), 3.15 (m, 1H), 4.05 (dd,
J
AB=12 Hz, J=2 Hz, 1H), 4.10 (dd, JAB=12 Hz, J=2
Hz, 1H), 9.72 (s, 1H); 13C NMR: 17.8, 22.3, 30.5, 36.1,
43.8, 45.1, 49.8, 68.7, 201.1, 207.9; [h]2D1=−39 (c 0.49,
CHCl3).
Product 8: 8.14 mmol of NaClO2 (80% purity, 920 mg)
in 8 mL of water were added dropwise in 15 min to a
stirred mixture of 5.8 mmol of 7 (1.3 g) in 5.8 mL of
CH3CN, 1.54 mmol of NaH2PO4·H2O (212 mg) in 2.3
mL of water and 6 mmol of 35% H2O2 (575 mL). The
All the compounds have been fully characterized.
Selected data:
Product 7: 1 mmol of 5 (194 mg) was dissolved in 12
mL (v/v) of AcOEt–CH3CN. Then at 0°C, 0.07 mmol