3
a
1
2
Reaction conditions: under argon atmosphere, R R P(O)H 1 (1.0 mmol) was
O
P
AcCl (10 mmol)
vacuum ( 100 Pa)
dissolved in 2.0 mL THF, and then MeC(O)Cl (2.0 mmol) was added to the
solution. The mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight, and volatiles
Ph
H
Ph PCl
2
THF (10 mL)
Ph
b
o
c
were removed under vacuum. Yields were based on 1 used. 50 C.
diastereomeric pure (-)menthylphenylphosphine oxide R( )-1e was used. 1
hour. 2e obtained as a 74/26 mixture of diastereomers (SI). 0°C, 1 h.
A
o
2
5 C, overnight
5 mmol
1.01 g
1
.05 g (4.77 mmol)
P
d
95 % yield
e
n
2 2
Treating 2f with BuMgCl and then H O .
2 2
Scheme 3. Gram-scale preparation of Ph PCl from Ph P(O)H and
AcCl.
the reagents for this transformation. Both aromatic and aliphatic
SPOs were all readily reduced to the corresponding phosphine
chlorides with excellent yields under similar reactions. For
example, in addition to Ph
SPOs bearing an electron-denoting group (p-MeO-C
6 4 2
b and an electron-withdrawing group (p-CF -C H )
all were reduced to the corresponding phosphine chlorides in
high yields (Table 2, runs 2–3). The conversion of an
alkylarylphosphine oxide like Pht-BuP(O)H 1d also could
proceed smoothly to produce the corresponding P-Cl products in
a nearly quantitative yield (Table 2, run 4). Similarly, a chiral
2
P(O)H 1a (Table 2, run 1), aromatic
P(O)H
P(O)H 1c,
Conclusions
6
4 2
H )
1
3
In summary, we have developed a convenient method for the
synthesis of chlorophosphines from secondary phosphine oxides
and acetyl chloride under mild conditions. After the reaction, a
simple removal of the volatiles under vacuum affords the target
3
1
1
2
R PCl in spectroscopically pure form as confirmed by P and H
NMR spectroscopies. Various secondary phosphine oxides,
diarylphosphine oxides, alkyl(aryl)phosphine oxides and
dialkylphosphine oxides, all could be used as the substrates, and
were reduced readily to the corresponding phosphine chlorides in
high yields.
P
(R )-(-)menthylphenylphosphine oxide 1e could also efficiently
produce the corresponding chlorophosphine 2e as a mixture of
diastereomers (run 5) (SI ref. 10). Moreover, dioctyl phosphine
oxide n-Oct
2
P(O)H also reacted with MeC(O)Cl quickly to give
PCl,
n-Oct PCl (Table1, run 6). Since the high reactivity of n-Oct
2
2
the confirmation of its formation was carried out by quenching
the reaction mixture using n-BuMgCl, following oxidation with
hydrogen peroxide to produce the corresponding stable
butyldioctylphosphine oxide 2f (66% isolated yield). However,
Acknowledgments
L.-B.H. thanks a visiting professorship from Lanzhou
University.
2
diethyl phosphite (EtO) P(O)H and ethyl phenylphosphinate
Ph(EtO)P(O)H sluggishly reacted with AcCl even at a high
temperature (120 C).
o
Supplementary Material
Although treating Ph
AcCl in THF all can lead to the formation of Ph
the reaction with AcCl is cleaner than that of PCl
2
P(O)H with 2 equivalents of PCl
PCl (Scheme 2),
which is
3
and
Supplementary data was associated with this article.
2
3
References and notes
accompanied by the formation of a few phosphorus by-products.
In addition, AcOH generated using AcCl, if necessary, can be
easily pumped off from the chlorophosphines under vacuum to
give highly pure chlorophosphines (Scheme 1 (2)).
1
.
(a) Humbel, S.; Bertrand, C.; Darcel, C.; Bauduin, C.; Jugé, S. Inorg.
Chem. 2003, 42, 420–427; (b) Sprinz, J; Helmchen, G. Tetrahedron Lett.
1
1
2
2
993, 34, 1769–1772; (c) Clark, P. W. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 1979, 11,
03–106; (d) Tomori, H.; Fox, J. M.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Org. Chem.
000, 65, 5334–5341; (e) Hoshiya, N.; Buchwald, S. L. Adv. Synth. Catal.
012, 354, 2031–2037; (f) Budnikova, Y.; Kargin, Y.; Nédélec, J. Y.;
Périchon, J. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 575, 63–66; (g) Wu, W. Q.;
Peng, Q.; Dong, D. X.; Hou, X. L.; Wu, Y. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
1
30, 9717–9725; (h) Wang, A. E.; Xie, J. H.; Wang, L. X.; Zhou, Q. L.
Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 259–266; (i) Hillebrand, S.; Bruckmann, J.;
Krüger, C.; Haenel, M. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 75–78; (j)
Bergbreiter, D. E.; Yang, Y. C. J. Org. Chem. 2010. 75, 873–878; (k)
Russell, M. G.; Warren, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7995–7998; (l)
Wang, X.; Han, Z.; Wang, Z.; Ding, K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51,
9
2
36–940; (m) Yip, John H. K.; Prabhavathy, J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
001, 40, 2159–2162; (n) Hessler, A.; Stelzer, O.; Dibowski, H.; Worm,
K.;Schmidtchen, F. P. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 2362–2369; (o) Hirata, G.;
Satomura, H.; Kumagae, H.; Shimizu, A.; Onodera, G.; Kimura, M. Org.
Lett. 2017, 19, 6148–6151.
2
.
(a) Necas, M.; Novosad, J. Phosphorus Research Bull. 2001, 12, 73–76;
(
b) Prashanth, B.; Singh, S. J. Chem. Sci. 2001, 127, 315–325; (c)
Broomfield, L. M.; Wu, Y.; Martin, E.; Shafir, A. Adv. Synth. Catal.
015, 357, 3538–3548; (d) Aguirre, P. A.; Lagos, C. A.; Moya, S. A.;
Zúñiga, C.; Vera-Oyarce, C.; Sola, E.; Bayón, J. C. Dalton Trans. 2007,
6, 5419–5426; (e) Broomfield, L. M.; Wu, Y.; Martin, E.; Shafir, A.
2
30
200
170
140
110
f1 (ppm)
80
60
40
20
0
-20
2
Scheme 2. 31P NMR spectroscopies of the reaction mixture of
4
Ph
2
P(O)H with PCl
3
(A) and AcCl (B), respectively.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 3538–3548; (f) Saha, D.; Ghosh, R.; Sarkar,
To further demonstrate the utility of the current reaction, as
A. Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 3951–3960.
shown in Scheme 3, a gram-scale transformation of Ph P(O)H to
Ph PCl was conducted by stirring 1.01 g Ph P(O)H with 2
2
3
4
.
.
(a) Otto, N.; Opatz, T. Beils. J. Org. Chem., 2012, 8, 1105–1111; (b)
Khan, S. R.; Bhanage, B. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 5998–6001; (c)
Grünanger, C. U.; Breit, B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7346–7349;
2
2
equivalents of AcCl in 10 mL THF at room temperature
overnight. After the reaction, volatiles were removed under a
reduced pressure (100 Pa) to afforded spectroscopically pure
(d) Ma, Y.; Chen, F.; Bao, J.; Wei, H., Shi; M.;Wang, F. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2016, 57, 2465–2467.
(a) Buchner, B.; Lockhart, L. B. Org. Synth. 1963, 88; (b) Weinberg, K.
G. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 3586–3589; (c) Miles, J. A.; Beeny, M. T.;
Ratts, K. W. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 343–347; (d) Buchner, B.; Lockhart
Jr, L. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 755–756; (e) Heinz, N. U.S. Patent
Ph
2
PCl in 95% yield.8
3
078304, 1963; (f) Petrov, K. A.; Agafonov, S. V.; Pokatun, V. P.;
Chizhov, V. M. Zh. Obshch. Khim, 1987, 57, 299–302.
5
.
(a) Berlin, K. D.; Butler, G. B. Chem. Rev. 1960, 60, 243–260; (b)
Emmick, T. L.; Letsinger, R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 3459–3465;