696
Chemistry Letters 2001
A Good Performance VPO Catalyst for Partial Oxidation
of n-Butane to Maleic Anhydride
Xiaoshu Wang,†,†† Weiyan Nie,†† Weijie Ji,*†† Xuefeng Guo,†† Qijie Yan,*†† and Yi Chen††
†Center for Materials Analysis, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210093, P. R. China
††Deparment of Chemistry, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210093, P. R. China
(Received March 29, 2001; CL-010289)
A VPO catalyst prepared by the reaction of vanadium pen-
rate of 2K/min, in an atmosphere of 1.5% n-butane/air and acti-
vated at this temperature for 12 h (GHSV=1800 h–1). For the
VPO2, it was prepared in the similar way except that the
PEG2000 was not adopted.
toxide and isobutyl alcohol/benzyl alcohol in the presence of
polyethylene glycol with the molecular weight of 2000
(PEG2000) was found to be highly selective and active for the
conversion of n-butane to maleic anhydride.
The BET surface areas were measured by nitrogen adsorp-
tion at 77 K using a Micromeritics ASAP 2000 adsorption
apparatus. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was conducted on a
Shimadzu D/MAX-RA diffractometer with graphite filtered Cu
Kα radiation. XPS was performed on a VG ESCALAB MKII
spectrometer, with the X-ray energy of 1253.6 eV (Mg Kα).
The binding energy was referred to the C1s signal (284.6 eV).
Infrared spectra were collected on a Nicolet 170SX Fourier
transform infrared spectrometer. The catalyst evaluation was
carried out in a quartz micro-reactor and 0.5 g catalyst was
charged. The reaction mixture consisted of n-C4H10/O2/N2 =
1.5/17.2/81.3 (volume ratio) with GHSV=1200 h–1. The reac-
tion temperature was in the range of 593–698 K. Two on-line
gas chromatography systems were adopted to analyze the outlet
reaction mixture.
The vanadium phosphorus oxide catalysts (VPO) are wide-
ly used for selective oxidation of n-butane to maleic anhydride.
The typical performance for currently used industrial VPO cata-
lyst was the MA yield of 55–58%, with butane conversion of
around 85% and MA selectivity of ca. 65 mol%. The selectivi-
ty was not sufficiently high and large amount of butane was
burned to COX. It is commonly suggested that the efficient cat-
alysts are associated with the presence of vanadyl pyrophos-
phate, (VO)2P2O7, and the catalyst performance depends
strongly on the preparation history.1–3 In one standard method,
the catalysts can be prepared by using HCl as the reducing
agent, and the obtained catalyst typically had low surface areas
(< 10 m2/g).1,3 In another standard procedure, the VPO cata-
lysts with higher surface area (around 20 m2/g) can be prepared
by using alcohols as solvent and reducing agent, and they gen-
erally showed better catalytic performance than the former.3,4
Since the total surface area is closely related to the active sites
available for the reaction, it is a constant interesting project for
researchers if some novel methods can be applied to prepare
high-surface area VPO catalyst which still maintains the essen-
tial active and selective component or phase for the reaction.
Different approaches have been tried to prepare small particle,
high-surface area system, including mechanical milling5 and
super critical field drying (SCFD) process6 in our laboratory
However, these methods are generally not so easy to operate and
control the process, especially for large quantity production. In
this work, we first reported here that the VPO catalyst was pre-
pared in the presence of polyethylene glycol. The obtained cata-
lyst showed rather high surface area (41 m2/g), small particle
size (< 100 nm) with rather even particle size distribution and
well-crystallized (VO)2P2O7 phase. The catalytic performance
was enhanced notably on the so-obtained sample.
The BET surface area of VPO1 is 41 m2/g, much higher
than that of VPO2, 19 m2/g. The XRD results indicated that the
two precursors were all the well-crystallized VOHPO4·0.5H2O
phase. The XRD patterns for both the VPO1 and VPO2 cata-
lysts accords well to those of (VO)2P2O7 phase,1–3 seen in
Figure 1. Note that although the major phase composition was
almost the same for the two catalysts, the crystallinity and the
relative diffraction intensities for different crystal planes are
different (for VPO1, I(200)/I(042) = 0.83 and FWHM(200) = 0.56;
for VPO2, I(200)/I(042) =1.14 and FWHM(200) = 0.40), reflecting
the deviations in microstructure between these two samples.
The infrared spectra showed that both VPO1 and VPO2 had the
characteristic IR features of the vanadyl pyrophosphate,8 name-
ly, the bands of 1248 cm–1, 1141 cm–1, 1080 cm–1, and 969
cm–1, but the 1248 cm–1 band was rather weak for the VPO2
sample (not shown). The C–H and C–O vibration bands were
not observed in the infrared spectrum of the freshly activated
Two catalysts were prepared for comparison: for the VPO1,
the preparation procedure was detailed in a Chinese patent.7
Typically, 3.2 g of V2O5 were suspended in a mixture of 70 mL
of isobutyl alcohol and 50 mL of benzyl alcohol under reflux-
ing, then PEG 2000 and H3PO4 (85%) were added under further
refluxing, with a molar ratio of the repeating unit (CH2CH2O)
of PEG2000 to the vanadium being 2 and the P/V molar ratio
being 1.2. The resulting suspension was cooled down to room
temperature and filtered. The precipitate was washed with
isobutyl alcohol and acetone, and then dried at 393 K for 24 h.
The precursor was heated from room temperature to 673 K, at a
Copyright © 2001 The Chemical Society of Japan