W. Wang et al. / Catalysis Communications 60 (2015) 50–54
51
2
. Experimental
spectrums displayed two peaks at 187.8 and 192.1 eV. The former one
was attributed to elemental B, while the latter one was attributed to
3
+
2
.1. Catalyst preparation
B
[20,21]. In the Fig. 1c, the peaks around 129.5 and 133.4 eV were
assigned to elemental phosphorus with metal nickel and oxidized phos-
phorus, respectively. In comparison with the standard binding energies
of pure Ni, B and P, a positive shift of the elemental B and a negative shift
of the elemental Ni and P were observed in all the as-prepared samples.
These observations implied that the elemental B donated partial elec-
trons to the metal Ni and the phosphorus accepted electrons from the
nickel metal, which was in good accordance with previous investiga-
tions [22,23]. The peaks around 31.4 eV and 33.4 eV in Fig. 1d were at-
Ni–W–P–B amorphous catalysts were prepared by the following
steps. NiSO
5 mL H O solution, and then NH
Na WO ·2H
a 250 mL three-necked flask. A 20 mL NaBH
4
·6H
2
O (1.57 g) and NaH
2
PO
2
(1.0 g) were dissolved in
O (25 wt.%, 1.6 g) and
2
2
3
·H
2
2
4
2
O were added into the above solution following placed in
(1.0 g) aqueous solution
4
was added dropwise to the three-necked flask with vigorous agitation
at 273 K. The resulting black precipitate was washed with water and
ethanol. Finally, the sample was dried under vacuum at 323 K for 4 h
and was donated as Ni–W-X, where X represented the Ni/W molar
ratio in the initial solution.
0
tributed to W , while the peaks around 35.6 eV and 37.7 eV were
attributed to WO
3
[20]. The appearance of W0 suggested that some
6
+
W
was reduced to metal W.
The surface compositions of Ni–W-2, Ni–W-1, Ni–W-0.5 and Ni–W-
2
.2. Catalyst characterization
0.33 samples are summarized and listed in Table 1. With the decrease of
Ni/W mole ratio in the raw material, Ni/W mole ratio on the catalyst
surface was decreased from 1:0.22 for Ni–W-2 to 1:4.36 for Ni–W-
Specific surface area was measured by a Quantachrome's NOVA-
100e Surface Area instrument by physisorption of nitrogen at 77 K.
2
+
−
2
0.33. This resulted from the reaction of Ni with NH
Ni in the reaction system decreased gradually, but the total of NH
4
. The amount of
2
+
−
The prepared samples were dehydrated at 460 K using vacuum
degassing for 12 h before analysis. X-ray diffraction (XRD) test was car-
ried on a D/max 2550 18 kW Rotating anode X-ray Diffractometer with
Cu Kα (λ = 1.5418 Å) radiation (40 kV, 300 mA). The surface composi-
tion and surface electronic state were analyzed by X-ray Photoelectron
Spectroscopy (XPS) using Kratos Axis Ultra DLD instrument.
4
−
kept constant. After forming the complex, the remained NH
4
was in-
creased with the decrease of Ni2 , leading to the rise on pH value for
+
the reaction solution. As a result, the reaction of Ni2 with BH
+
−
4
was
inhibited and then decreased Ni/W mole ratio on the catalyst surface.
On the other hand, the formation of complex hindered the precipitation
2
+
−
reaction between Ni and OH to produce Ni(OH)
2
, causing the in-
0
2
.3. Catalyst activity measurement
creasing Ni content and decreasing Ni(OH) on the catalyst surface.
Table 1 showed that Ni content on the catalyst surface in this study
2
0
The catalyst activity tests were carried out in a 300-mL sealed auto-
was much higher than that in the previous study [18]. This suggested
0
clave. The fresh catalyst (0.2 g, particle size ≤75 μm), p-cresol (13.51 g)
and dodecane (86.49 g) were placed into the autoclave. Air in the auto-
clave was evacuated by pressurization–depressurization cycles with ni-
trogen and subsequently with hydrogen. The mixture was heated at 10
K/min to 298 K, then pressurized with hydrogen to 4.0 MPa, and stabilized
the stirring speed at 900 rpm. During the reaction, the pressure, stirrer
speed, and temperature were kept constant. Liquid samples were with-
drawn from the reactor and analyzed by Agilent 6890/5973N GC–MS.
To separate the reaction products, the temperature in the GC oven was
heated from 313 K to 358 K with the ramp of 20 K/min, held at 358 K
for 4.0 min, then heated to 473 K at a rate of 20 K/min and kept at 473
K for 5.0 min. The carbon balance in the sample for each of experiment
was better than 95 ± 3%. External and internal mass transfer limitations
could be neglected because of the small catalyst particle size and high stir-
ring speed. The amounts of p-cresol and products were analyzed by
Agilent 7890 gas chromatography using a flame ionization detector
3 2
that adding NH ·H O was beneficial to improve the Ni content on the
catalyst surface, but adding exceeding NH
Ni content.
3 2
·H O lowered the total of
As shown in Fig. 2, all the samples displayed only one broad peak
centered at 2θ = 45°, presenting a typical amorphous structure [19–21].
The intensity of this peak (2θ = 45°) corresponded to amorphous de-
gree [22]. Ni–W-2 exhibited a weaker peak than Ni–W-1, indicating
the higher amorphous degree of Ni–W-2 and the lower amorphous de-
gree of Ni–W-1. It had reported that tungsten oxides and phosphorus
oxide could act as dispersant agents [20,24]. Hence, W6 and P spe-
cies could prevent the particle agglomeration efficiently, resulting in
the high amorphous degree. On the contrary, there existed a strong
+
n+
0
0
0
0
interaction between Ni and B and Ni and P in the prepared catalysts,
0
leading to the promoted agglomeration of particles. The more the B
and P contents on the catalyst surface are, the lower the amorphous
0
degree. The surface area results also supported this inference. As
(
FID) with a 30 m AT-5 capillary column. The deoxygenation degree
shown in Table 1, the surface area decreased in the order of Ni–W-
2
2
2
(DD) for each experiment was calculated as follows:
0.5 (28.0 m /g) N Ni–W-2 (24.5 m /g) N Ni–W-0.33 (22.4 m /g) N
2
Ni–W-1 (17.2 m /g). In addition, the XPS results demonstrated that the
0
6+
n+
Deoxygenationdegree ðDD; wt:%Þ
prepared catalysts contained W , W , P and P , but these species
were not observed in Fig. 2, indicating that these species were in amor-
phous state and dispersed evenly in the catalyst.
ꢀ
ꢁ
oxygencontentinthefinalorganiccompounds
total oxygencontentintheinitialmaterial
¼
1−
ꢀ 100%:
3.2. Hydrodeoxygenation of p-cresol on Ni–W–P–B catalysts
3
. Results and discussion
The conversion and product selectivity versus reaction time in
3
.1. Characterization of Ni–W–P–B catalysts
the HDO of p-cresol on Ni–W-1 at 498 K are shown in Fig. 3a.
Methylcyclohexane, 3-methylcyclohexene, toluene, 4-methylcyclo-
hexanol and 4-methylcyclohexanone were produced during
p-cresol HDO reaction. After 1 h, the conversion reached to 99.6% with a
selectivity of 51.1% 4-methylcyclohexanol. Then, the HDO reaction in
this system was changed to the HDO of 4-methylcyclohexanol. The
selectivity of methylcyclohexane increased to 92.6% while the selec-
tivity of toluene increased to 5.1% for 5 h. Hence, it was concluded that
the main reaction route was HYD, where 4-methylcyclohexanone and
4-methylcyclohexanol acted as intermediates. The toluene selectivity in-
creased from 2.1% to 5.1% in the following 4 h. However, according to
Fig. 1 shows the XP spectra of Ni 2p, B 1s, P 2p and W 4f levels of Ni–
W–P–B, samples. Each of the spectra was deconvoluted, and the relative
content of each state was calculated based on the corresponding peak
area. It had reported that the standard binding energy of elemental Ni,
B, P and W was 853.0, 187.0, 130.4 and 31.0 eV [19,20], respectively, re-
vealing that all species in the prepared catalysts were present in both
oxidized state and elemental state. Two strong peaks at 852.4 and
8
55.8 eV and one weak peak at 860.4 eV appeared in Fig. 1a, corre-
sponding to metal Ni, NiO and Ni(OH) [20,21], respectively. All B 1s
2