3128
R. Lozano et al. / Polyhedron 25 (2006) 3127–3132
We have determined the kinetic parameters and the
3. Instrumentation
reaction mechanism of the process to be:
Elemental analyses were performed in a Perkin–Elmer
240 B elemental analyzer. Tungsten was determined by
Atomic Absorption with a Perkin–Elmer 430 Atomic
Absorption spectrophotometer, after decomposing the
complexes with a 1:1 mixture of concentrated nitric
and sulfuric acid. Magnetic susceptibility determinations
were performed at room temperature on a Mettler
H-51 AR balance and a type C Newport electromagnet.
Reported magnetic moments are corrected for ligand dia-
magnetism. Infrared spectra were measured on a Perkin–
Elmer 283 spectrophotometer. Visible–near UV spectra
of the compounds were measured on a Beckman DU7
spectrophotometer, using complex solutions in DMSO.
Thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning cal-
orimetry, were performed between 25 and 600 ꢁC on a
Mettler TA 3000 system fitted with a Mettler TG-50
thermobalance and a Mettler DSC-20 differential scan-
ning calorimeter. The scanning rate used was 2 ꢁC minꢁ1
and samples of about 5 mg, as a very fine powder, were
used, so as to render insignificant the temperature non-
uniformity within the sample. An aluminium pan was
used under a dynamic nitrogen atmosphere. The instru-
ment calibration was checked periodically with standard
samples of indium (99.99 % purity). Several runs were
made.
½W2S4ðdi-i-propyldtcÞ2B2ꢀ ðsolidÞ
! ½W2S4ððdi-i-propyldtcÞÞ2ꢀ ðsolidÞ þ 2B ðgasÞ
and we have determined the activation energy and the pre-
exponential Arrhenius factor for all the adducts synthe-
sized, using a new non-isothermal kinetic method, reported
previously by us.
The determination of kinetic parameters by non-isother-
mal methods offers interesting advantages over conven-
tional isothermal studies [19–26]. Only a single sample and
fewer data are required and the kinetics can be calculated
over an entire temperature range in a continuous manner.
A disadvantage of the non-isothermal methods, when
are compared with the isothermal techniques, is that the
reaction mechanism cannot usually be determined, and
hence the meaning of the kinetics parameters is uncertain.
However, with the new proposed method, the reaction
mechanism can be determined [27–29].
A comparison between activation energies (Ea), steric or
inductive factors, infrared and electronic spectral data and
pKb values of the coordinated bases has also been explored.
2. Experimental
2.1. Synthesis
3.1. Kinetic studies
[W2S4(di-i-propyldtc)2]: Prepared as previously reported
[15].
The rate of a thermal decomposition reaction of a solid
can be expressed by the Arrhenius equation:
[W2S4(di-i-propyldtc)2B2]: 0.01 mol of [W2S4(di-i-propyl-
dtc)2] was dissolved in 0.02 mol of the organic base (pyri-
dine, 3-methyl, 4-methyl and 3,5-dimethylpyridine) or in
an ethanolic solution of 0.02 mol of 3-amino and 4-amino-
pyridine and heated in a water bath for about 15 min. After
cooling for 2 days, the adducts, obtained as brownish pow-
ders, were separated by filtration in vacuo and dried over
P4O10 in a nitrogen atmosphere.
[W2S4(C7H14NS2)2(C5H5N)2]. Anal. Calc.: W, 36.58;
C, 28.62; N, 5.56; H, 3.77; S, 25.44. Found: W, 36.92; C,
29.01; N, 5.66; H, 3.81; S, 25.39%. l = 0.03 B.M.
[W2S4(C7H14NS2)2(C5H4N,3-CH3)2]. Anal. Calc.: W,
35.58; C, 30.17; N, 5.41; H, 4.06; S, 24.75. Found: W,
35.61; C, 30.00; N, 5.92; H, 3.85; S, 24.64%. l = 0.00 B.M.
[W2S4(C7H14NS2)2(C5H4N,4-CH3)2]. Anal. Calc.: W,
35.58; C, 30.17; N, 5.41; H, 4.06; S, 24.75. Found: W,
35.44; C, 29.87; N, 5.32; H, 4.12; S, 24.52%. l = 0.07 B.M.
[W2S4(C7H14NS2)2[C5H3N(CH3)2]2]. Anal. Calc.: W,
34.65; C, 31.63; N, 5.27; H, 4.33; S, 24.10. Found: W,
34.81; C, 31.27; N, 5.18; H, 4.51; S, 24.00%. l = 0.10 B.M.
[W2S4(C7H14NS2)2(C5H4N,3-NH2)2]. Anal. Calc.: W,
35.52; C, 27.79; N, 8.10; H, 3.86; S, 24.71. Found: W,
35.77; C, 27.80; N, 8.74; H, 3.91; S, 24.53%. l = 0.05 B.M.
[W2S4(C7H14NS2)2(C5H4N,4-NH2)2]. Anal. Calc.: W,
35.52; C, 27.79; N, 8.10; H, 3.86; S, 24.71. Found: W,
35.66; C, 27.50; N, 7.87; H, 3.74; S, 24.78%. l = 0.03 B.M.
da=dt ¼ AeꢁE =RT f ðaÞ
ð1Þ
a
In Eq. (1), a is the fraction of material which has reacted at
time t, Ea is the activation energy, f(a) is a function which
depends on the actual reaction mechanism and A is the pre-
exponential Arrhenius factor.
We have collected in Table 1 the mathematical expres-
sions of the functions f(a) corresponding to some of the
thermal decomposition mechanisms found in the literature
[19].
When the temperature of the sample is increased at a
constant rate, we can write Eq. (2), where b is the heating
rate, dT/dt:
da=dT ¼ a0 ¼ ðA=bÞeꢁE =RT f ðaÞ
ð2Þ
a
By differentiating the logarithmic form of Eq. (2) with re-
spect to dln(1 ꢁ a), we obtain the following equation:
dlna0=dlnð1 ꢁ aÞ ¼ ꢁðEa=RÞ½dð1=TÞ=dlnð1 ꢁ aÞꢀ
þ ½dlnf ðaÞ=dlnð1 ꢁ aÞꢀ or
Dlna0=Dlnð1 ꢁ aÞ ¼ ꢁðEa=RÞ½Dð1=TÞ=Dlnð1 ꢁ aÞꢀ
þ ½Dlnf ðaÞ=Dlnð1 ꢁ aÞꢀ and
½Dlna0 ꢁ Dlnf ðaÞꢀ=Dlnð1 ꢁ aÞ ¼ ꢁðEa=RÞ½Dð1=TÞ=Dlnð1 ꢁ aÞꢀ
ð3Þ