Table 3 E†ect of additives on Pd size/dispersion and the degree of phenol conversion/hydrogenation selectivity: Pd(CH COO) precursor;
3
2
T \ 503 K; WHSV \ 0.027 mol h~1 (g cat)~1; hydrogen/phenol \ 5.4
Selectivity (%)
Catalyst
Dispersion CO /Pd
d/nm from CO
Conversion (%)
S
S
irr
irr
CJO
ChOH
Pd/MgO
Pd/CaÈMgO
Pd/FÈMgO
0.56
0.55
0.36
2.0
2.1
3.1
90
90
54
80
60
80
20
40
20
support served to induce Pd crystallite growth (Table 3) which
is in keeping with our observations regarding the chlorine-
containing Pd precursors. The lower phenol conversion over
Pd/FÈMgO can likewise be attributed to a less e†ective acti-
vation of reactants on the surface. Based on ammonia chemi-
sorption data, the acid site concentration was raised from 7 to
18 mol (g cat)~1 due to the incorporation of F onto the
support. Phenol conversion over this catalyst was character-
ized by a decided decline in activity with time-on-stream, as
shown in Fig. 12, while the parent Pd/MgO and Ca-doped
samples both delivered appreciably more stable conversions.
Loss of activity in the case of Pd/FÈMgO can be ascribed to
coke formation on the acidic sites.
induced a desorption of surface phenol and an accompanying
decrease in reaction rate. The hydrogenation of phenol occurs
stepwise where cyclohexanone and cyclohexanol are the par-
tially and fully hydrogenated products, respectively; alter-
ations to such process variables as Pd loading, H /phenol mol
2
fraction and inlet phenol molar feed rate that serve to increase
the degree of conversion favour complete hydrogenation to
cyclohexanol. The incorporation of CaO into the magnesia
support had no e†ect on conversion but decreased cyclo-
hexanone selectivity by strengthening the phenol/catalyst
interaction(s); the presence of Ñuoride on the support lowered
activity but had no impact on selectivity.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the University Grants Commission
(UGC), New Delhi, for the award of a Senior Research Fel-
lowship to NM.
Conclusion
The gas-phase hydrogenation of phenol over Pd/MgO can be
classiÐed as a structure insensitive reaction where the inferred
Pd crystallite size falls within the range 3È7 nm. At lower par-
ticle sizes there is a decided drop in TOF which we attribute
to an electron deÐciency of the Pd sites that translates into a
less e†ective surface activation of the reactants. Palladium
dispersion/particle size is dependent on both the nature of the
Pd precursor and Pd loading: chlorine-containing precursors
yield larger Pd particles while dispersion decreases with
increasing Pd content. Palladium particle sizes measured by
CO chemisorption are lower than those obtained from
HRTEM analysis but the trends are the same. The calcined
samples are characterized by crystalline PdO and MgO
References
1
I. Dodgson, K. Griffin, G. Barberis, F. Piganttaro and G.
Tauszik, Chem. Ind. (L ondon), 1989, 830.
J. F. Van Peppen, W. B. Fischer and C. H. Chan, in Catalysis in
Organic Reactions, ed. R. L. Augustine, Marcel Dekker, New
York, 1980, p. 141.
2
3
4
5
6
G. Neri, A. M. Visco, A. Donato, C. Milone, M. Malentacchi and
G. Gubitosa, Appl. Catal. A, 1994, 110, 49.
V. Vishwanathan and S. Narayanan, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1990, 78.
V. Vishwanathan, M. S. Rajasekhar, G. Sreekanth and S. Naray-
anan, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday T rans., 1991, 87, 3449.
S. Narayanan and R. Unnikrishnan, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday
T rans., 1997, 93, 2009.
S. Narayanan and K. Krishna, Appl. Catal. A, 1996, 147, L253.
P. Claus, H. Berndt, C. Mohr, J. Radnik, E.-J. Shin and M. A.
Keane, J. Catal., 2000, 192, 88.
S. Galvagno, A. Donato, G. Neri and R. Pietropaolo, J. Chem.
T echnol. Biotechnol., 1991, 51, 145.
phases with no evidence of surface Mg(OH) ; crystallinity of
the MgO support is also evident from HRTEM analysis. The
Pd/MgO catalysts derived from PdCl and Pd(NH ) Cl
2
2
3 4 2
retained an appreciable residual surface chlorine content after
activation which served to lower the hydrogenation rate and
induce a loss of activity with time-on-stream; Pd/MgO pre-
pared from Pd(CH COO) delivered a higher and more stable
phenol conversion. The reaction orders with respect to phenol
and hydrogen suggest that the rate-controlling step is a
surface reaction between strongly bound phenol and weakly
adsorbed hydrogen. An increase in reaction temperature
7
8
9
3
2
10 A. K. Talukdar, K. G. Bhattacharyya and S. Sivasanker, Appl.
Catal. A, 1993, 96, 229.
11 N. Itoh and W.-C. Xu, Appl. Catal. A, 1993, 107, 83.
12 N. K. Nag, Catal. L ett., 1994, 24, 37.
13 T. E. Holt, A. D. Logan, S. Chakraborti and A. K. Datye, Appl.
Catal., 1987, 34, 199.
14 Y. Z. Chen, C. W. Liaw and L. I. Lee, Appl. Catal. A, 1999, 177, 1.
15 A. K. Talkudar, K. G. Bhattacharyya and S. Sivasanker, Appl.
Catal. A, 1993, 96, 229.
16 S. Narayanan, B. Prabhu Prasad and V. Vishwanathan, React.
Kinet. Catal. L ett., 1992, 48, 562.
17 S. Narayanan and G. Sreekanth, Ind. J. T echnol., 1993, 31, 507.
18 S. T. Srinivas, L. J. Lakshmi and P. K. Rao, Appl. Catal. A, 1994,
110, 167.
19 E.-J. Shin and M. A. Keane, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2000, 39, 883.
20 N. Mahata and V. Vishwanathan, Ads. Sci. T echnol., 1997, 15,
165.
21 N. Mahata and V. Vishwanathan, unpublished results.
22 J. R. Anderson, Structure of Metallic Catalysts, Academic Press,
London, 1975, p. 296.
23 Y. L. Lam and M. Boudart, J. Catal., 1977, 47, 393.
24 M. A. Vannice, S.-Y. Wang and S. H. Moon, J. Catal., 1981, 71,
152.
25 S. H. Ali and J. G. Goodwin Jr., J. Catal., 1998, 176, 3.
26 N. Mahata and V. Vishwanathan, Ind. J. Chem. A, 1998, 37, 652.
27 W. Zou and R. D. Gonzalez, Catal. L ett., 1992, 12, 73.
Fig. 12 Time-on-stream activity proÐles for the conversion of phenol
over Pd/MgO (…), Pd/CaÈMgO (]) and Pd/FÈMgO (=): T \ 503
K; WHSV \ 0.027 mol h~1 (g cat)~1; hydrogen/phenol \ 5.4.
2718
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2001, 3, 2712È2719